I met a very good friend for lunch the other day. I haven't seen him for a long time because I was living abroad, but I'm back now.
This guy used to be a bit of a hellraiser but now he's very focused on career (and doing very well, which he totally deserves).
He's divorced but is now living with a new girl (HB5). I'm 36, he's 34 and she's 32.
I told him basically I had decided that settling down wasn't for me and I was going to go it alone for the foreseeable future. He told me, 'You've got another six years before no bangable woman will find you attractive at all.' To be clear, this wasn't a personal insult (I look younger than my age). He was saying that after 42, no youngish woman is going to be attracted to a guy that age. I didn't tell him that I'd slept with a 21 year old a couple of weeks previously. I also didn't point out that by his logic, by the time he's 42, his own girlfriend (he will marry her) won't be bangable.
Aside from that I just don't think it's true at all. I thought it was a really weird and kind of barbed thing for him to say, almost akin to the 'shaming' that women would do of older guys going for younger girls. I told him I disagreed but didn't turn it into some argument.
Part of me was amused by what he said and his naivety, part of me was irritated and part of me wondered if he might be right. For me 'bangable' means up to about 36. It doesn't seem at all unrealistic for a guy into his late forties or early fifties even to be banging pretty hot women up to 36.
Was he talking utter nonsense or do you think there's some truth in what he's saying?
This guy used to be a bit of a hellraiser but now he's very focused on career (and doing very well, which he totally deserves).
He's divorced but is now living with a new girl (HB5). I'm 36, he's 34 and she's 32.
I told him basically I had decided that settling down wasn't for me and I was going to go it alone for the foreseeable future. He told me, 'You've got another six years before no bangable woman will find you attractive at all.' To be clear, this wasn't a personal insult (I look younger than my age). He was saying that after 42, no youngish woman is going to be attracted to a guy that age. I didn't tell him that I'd slept with a 21 year old a couple of weeks previously. I also didn't point out that by his logic, by the time he's 42, his own girlfriend (he will marry her) won't be bangable.
Aside from that I just don't think it's true at all. I thought it was a really weird and kind of barbed thing for him to say, almost akin to the 'shaming' that women would do of older guys going for younger girls. I told him I disagreed but didn't turn it into some argument.
Part of me was amused by what he said and his naivety, part of me was irritated and part of me wondered if he might be right. For me 'bangable' means up to about 36. It doesn't seem at all unrealistic for a guy into his late forties or early fifties even to be banging pretty hot women up to 36.
Was he talking utter nonsense or do you think there's some truth in what he's saying?