I would have hired the host, Kristen Twiford, to be the VP of Bud Light, she looks much better.
Look at the differences between Kristin Twiford (podcast host and marketer) and Alissa Heinerscheid (VP of Marketing, Bud Light). There's a reason Twiford is better looking and would be more dateable to men.
Twiford has longer hair. She is also 6 years younger.
Twiford has only a bachelor's degree from a state university whereas Heinerscheid has a bachelor's degree from an elite university and a master's degree (MBA) from a different elite university. Heinerscheid's MBA comes from a Top 5 MBA program. It's very competitive to get into that program. Getting into 2 elite universities and graduating from them has a way of reducing femininity.
Twiford would likely be considered a career woman as well. She has a marketing management role at a smaller company.
That chick has more crazy vibes than a lunatic asylum. The hand gestures, manner of speech, facial expressions, wild eyes…she sounds like she’s about one Xanax away from launching into a rant about the voices in her head.
This is what happens when you live an entire lifestyle going against nature. Heinerscheid has spent the last ~25 years (she's 39) denying her feminine nature. She got 2 prestigious academic degrees out of it and has worked on some impressive brands as a marketer.
The article below mentions Alissa Heinerscheid of Bud Light.
The point of a Mulvaney endorsement is to pave the royal propaganda road to a brave new world where men and women really are interchangeable. And woe betide any female athlete, or a male manual lab…
nypost.com
Take high-flying girlboss Alissa Gordon Heinerscheid, for example.
Heinerscheid is the vice president of Bud Light, one of the household-name brands that just sponsored Mulvaney.
According to her LinkedIn profile, she’s the “first female to lead the largest beer brand in the industry.”
Girlbosses such as Heinerscheid have little reason not to believe that women can do everything men can do.
Because for professional executives, it’s pretty much true.
There’s no obvious reason why a woman shouldn’t be as capable of doing a corporate desk job as well as a man.
The entire article makes some good points but I disagree with one. On the surface, it appears that women can be as capable of doing a corporate desk job as a man. The problem is that it is simplistic analysis. Women can appear to be able to handle the physical requirements of a corporate desk job. They are far less likely to be able to handle a physical manual labor job.
The problem is that corporate desk jobs have stressful environments that are not conducive to healthy femininity. Women were not designed to spend their lives in environments that were mentally and emotionally taxing. This is why corporate desk jobs prior to the 1960s-1970s were only done by men. While women can handle the physical requirements of white collar work, they are not as well suited to handle the mental and emotional effects of white collar work. The negative mental and emotional effects of white collar work are more subtle than not being able to do physical labor, so women can appear to work white collar jobs and be fine. They aren't. This is part of why women have increased their use of anti-depressant drugs.
