We will have a chance to vote for Edwards again in 2027.There is a reason he was elected governor three times. Yes.... he used his position to often enrich himself, but the truth is he was actually a good governor. Yeah... you had to tolerate some of his questionable behavior... but when he was governor... the state was run well. Things got done... he really cared about the poor and middle class, while at the same time balancing business interests.
I don't want to start a political thread here, but if Edwin Edwards rose from the dead and ran for Governor... I would vote for him. IN fact, his dead body would be better than what we have now. I believe one of the reasons why Jon Bel Edwards served two terms as governor was because the name "Edwards" (even though Jon Bel was not related, as I'm sure you know) still carries a lot of pollical clout.
Truth is I'm pretty sure I will not be in Louisiana in 2027. Our current governor is an idiot. Myopically focused on his social conservative base. As a business owner in this state I will say that my biggest problem is my rising insurance rates, rising property tax rates, rising crime rates, my inability to find educated and trained staff to do the work that I expect. I can't get people to move here because anyone that comes here has to figure out a way to pay for the education of their children since our public schools just suck. Nothing is being done about any of this.We will have a chance to vote for Edwards again in 2027.
St. Tammany Parish has good schools, but point well taken - the only folks that are OK with the Incel-breeding environment known as same-sex Catholic schools are willing to put up with it, and most folks in the country aren't. Insurance rates are rising everywhere (look at Florida!), so there is no way out of that (i.e., tornadoes in Iowa in December ) without going somewhere where water is scarce (NOTE: New, certified-fortified construction will keep the rates down). Louisiana has always been a tough place to draw in professional folks, but there certainly are enough natives that would take such jobs, but employers want the purple squirrels.Truth is I'm pretty sure I will not be in Louisiana in 2027. Our current governor is an idiot. Myopically focused on his social conservative base. As a business owner in this state I will say that my biggest problem is my rising insurance rates, rising property tax rates, rising crime rates, my inability to find educated and trained staff to do the work that I expect. I can't get people to move here because anyone that comes here has to figure out a way to pay for the education of their children since our public schools just suck. Nothing is being done about any of this.
Personally I don't give a flying fvck about any social conservative issues... I care that I'm spending more and more to operate my business, and my personal cost of living is going through the roof, while my margins narrow. We went thought this with Jindal... I guess 8 years of reasonable balanced leadership we got with Jon Bel was just too much for social conservatives... so now we are back to stupid.
I was in Orleans Parish until I just couldn't take it anymore... the constant fighting with the NOS&WB and Entergy-Orleans is just soul sucking. My kids never went to public schools, they went to private school... mostly because I went to Public schools in Jefferson Parish and the only thing I learned was how to fight (and this was over 40 years ago... it's much worst now). When my parents finally put me in private school (sixth grade) I was at least two years behind and had to take Summer and after school tutoring to get caught up.St. Tammany Parish has good schools, but point well taken - the only folks that are OK with the Incel-breeding environment known as same-sex Catholic schools are willing to put up with it, and most folks in the country aren't. Insurance rates are rising everywhere (look at Florida!), so there is no way out of that (i.e., tornadoes in Iowa in December ) without going somewhere where water is scarce (NOTE: New, certified-fortified construction will keep the rates down). Louisiana has always been a tough place to draw in professional folks, but there certainly are enough natives that would take such jobs, but employers want the purple squirrels.
Well-said.He also has a ton of money and owns seven homes as well. Overrides the age and looks.
It's difficult to say. Bill Belichick is closely tied with his occupation as football coach. Professional football coaches make good money. He had been a professional football coach for over 45 years. He won 2 Super Bowl championships as an assistant coach and 6 Super Bowl championships as a head coachDoes Bill really seem like he'd be a fun date
This is all a money and status play.The 24 year old is only with him for his money and status.
Remove the money/status from the equation, no way could a man his age get a 24 year old.
I'm impressed. Most guys who are 65-75 years old would like to have sex with a 20-29 year old if they could pull it off.I'm not even impressed with him by the way. A man his age getting with a 24 year old is wrong on so many levels.
My stance on Bill's relationship is probably clouded by my own age preference.It's difficult to say. Bill Belichick is closely tied with his occupation as football coach. Professional football coaches make good money. He had been a professional football coach for over 45 years. He won 2 Super Bowl championships as an assistant coach and 6 Super Bowl championships as a head coach
It's possible to do an experiment and try to separate the two. Football coaches teach. Who else teaches? University/college professors. Let's try to imagine a reality where Bill Belichick is some sort of university professor.
If Bill Belichick had been a retired professor in Economics/Business from colleges like New York University (instead of assistant coach of New York Giants/New York Jets) or Harvard/Massachusetts Institute of Technology (instead of head coach of New England Patriots), how would his mating life be different?
Economics/Business professor Belichick is not getting far younger pussie even if he had the status of being a professor at Harvard Business School (top graduate business school). That would even be true if he were a Economics professor who won a Nobel Prize (somewhat analogous to winning a Super Bowl).
As a retired or even aging, active professor at a top university, I can't imagine that Belichick would be that interesting of a date. Most women aren't going to be deeply into economic theory or components of corporate finance. Most women in general are not interested in football formations and the strategies/tactics used to win football games.
Belichick's last girlfriend Linda Holliday was 11 years younger after his first divorce in the 2000s. That's realistic for Economics/Business professor. She was attractive for an older woman but not even close to as attractive as Belichick's new girlfriend in her 20s. A notable professor could have a girlfriend 11 years younger after a divorce who might be close to Holliday's attractiveness level.
There are women who would be interested in dating a notable Harvard/MIT professor for his money and achievements, but not nearly on the same level as a 24 year old dating a 72 year old.
Some aging women who might look good for their age might have some interest in a professorial type guy.
This is all a money and status play.
I'm impressed. Most guys who are 65-75 years old would like to have sex with a 20-29 year old if they could pull it off.
Guys in their late 30s/early 40s would like an under 25 girlfriend too.
Do not be too easy. If you are too easy to get, she will not want you. If you are too easy to keep, she will lose interest in you. If you are too easy to control, she will not respect you.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
Remove the money/status from the equation, no way could a man his age get a 24 year old.
I'm not even impressed with him by the way. A man his age getting with a 24 year old is wrong on so many levels.
Sour grapes. He's paying for sex. You've paid for sex. Everything about you is wrong on so many levels and definitely doesn't sound right, but you want to consider an old man paying for sex with a young woman to be 'wrong'? You're just angry at anyone who gets any when you don't. And you know how to get sex: stop malingering, whinging and b!tiching.Still, the idea of a man that old getting with a 24 year old doesn't sound right (even if the man loves it)
Still, he's worth *only* $70 million and yet he's dong much better than a number of tech billionaires who are decades younger and worth thousands of times more (think Zuck and Bezos).Well-said.
The 24 year old is only with him for his money and status.
Remove the money/status from the equation, no way could a man his age get a 24 year old.
I'm not even impressed with him by the way. A man his age getting with a 24 year old is wrong on so many levels.
Probably because tech billionaires tend to be socially awkward.Still, he's worth *only* $70 million and yet he's dong much better than a number of tech billionaires who are decades younger and worth thousands of times more (think Zuck and Bezos).
Exactly Belichick is the Prize and you got some guys here making her to be the prizeWhy is this surprising?
He is rich, famous, considered one of the greatest coaches to ever live and is universally revered in football circles.
He is on TV constantly.
Mutually beneficial...he gets to pound some hot young putang and have guys high giving him and she gets to associate with all of the fame, fortune and status to help build her own brand.
Plus I am sure she is building up potential monkey Branching opportunities with younger football friends.