Biggest Tests She Puts Men Through

bigneil

Banned
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
8,377
Reaction score
2,696
Location
Texas
Every single time in a relationship where I've showed significant feeling/emotion it has come back to bite me. By no means did I go overboard, I was simply being human. I think there's a double standard out there and sometimes feel guys aren't allowed to express themselves fully. When they do it is seen as weakness.
Even if she is describing what you are feeling (saying how good it feels when you hold her, etc), it's still not safe to express feelings. It's not even safe to say you feel the same way.

Are we really supposed to believe that our ancestors felt zero emotion, ever? Did women always punish men for being human? Is it the key of feminism, the idea that men should be infinitely strong? A man who shows zero emotion ever is called a Sociopath.

In the past, I think the bond women felt when they had sex was stronger than the loss of attraction they felt (if they ever did then) regarding him showing occasional emotion. I think promiscuity is the cornerstone that underwrites this horrible female philosophy.

I can see how a man shouldn't always be emotional, but when women want to be like "AHA! I saw you care about something!! You're not infinitely strong! No second chances!" it's almost pathological.
 

Roober

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 2, 2016
Messages
2,386
Reaction score
2,126
Even if she is describing what you are feeling (saying how good it feels when you hold her, etc), it's still not safe to express feelings. It's not even safe to say you feel the same way.

Are we really supposed to believe that our ancestors felt zero emotion, ever? Did women always punish men for being human? Is it the key of feminism, the idea that men should be infinitely strong? A man who shows zero emotion ever is called a Sociopath.

In the past, I think the bond women felt when they had sex was stronger than the loss of attraction they felt (if they ever did then) regarding him showing occasional emotion. I think promiscuity is the cornerstone that underwrites this horrible female philosophy.
Feminism has simultaneously given women strength and ruined the normal functioning of male/female gender dynamics. They only have themselves to blame!
 

The Duke

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
5,667
Reaction score
8,672
In the past, I think the bond women felt when they had sex was stronger than the loss of attraction they felt (if they ever did then) regarding him showing occasional emotion. I think promiscuity is the cornerstone that underwrites this horrible female philosophy.
I definitely see this, its pretty obvious with women that I've dated......the ones that were more promiscuous had a harder time bonding through secks.
 

Roober

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 2, 2016
Messages
2,386
Reaction score
2,126
Even if she is describing what you are feeling (saying how good it feels when you hold her, etc), it's still not safe to express feelings. It's not even safe to say you feel the same way.

Are we really supposed to believe that our ancestors felt zero emotion, ever? Did women always punish men for being human? Is it the key of feminism, the idea that men should be infinitely strong? A man who shows zero emotion ever is called a Sociopath.

In the past, I think the bond women felt when they had sex was stronger than the loss of attraction they felt (if they ever did then) regarding him showing occasional emotion. I think promiscuity is the cornerstone that underwrites this horrible female philosophy.

I can see how a man shouldn't always be emotional, but when women want to be like "AHA! I saw you care about something!! You're not infinitely strong! No second chances!" it's almost pathological.
It is part of the mystery of attraction. If you repeat, "I love spending time with you too" or other stuff like that, they know they got you. You can throw them a bone once in a while, but in all reality, you have to keep most of what you feel to yourself, especially early on in the bonding process.
 

bigneil

Banned
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
8,377
Reaction score
2,696
Location
Texas
The difference is at some point I attach while these women never attach fully. I say this because as material circumstances change (or any other random reason) they detach if not outright sabatoge things as opposed to me who only detaches for some of the most flagrant abusive behaviour.
This is true. The worst part is this happens with women you thought were head over heels for you. I've had it happen just hours after great sex. Usually it's like a balloon popping. There is no warning and no putting it back together. And since women live with zero sense of honor, they simply walk away regardless of anything they had promised. Men, being experts at this scenario, naturally have a traumatic reaction at some level. Women do everything to make us care, right down to their hair and makeup and outfits, and then they punish us if we actually, eventually care (and the amount of time it takes before we are permitted this seems to be getting longer and longer, now it's around 3-6 months). They would never be a member of a club that would have THEM as a member. This couldn't happen back in the days when we didn't have the welfare state (and/or 20 beta males along with a woman shameless enough to leverage them) backing them up. Feminism and the welfare state are simply enabling their innate corruption (by design, to undermine the family) and they exploit it to the maximum. How is any child safe when women are like this?
 

What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.

You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

Top