BeExcellent: "Nothing short of marriage is exclusive to be perfectly honest"

[Sub]

Naughty Ninja, sorry Guru scarred you that day. It’s going to be ok, I promise to show up next time, so keep your head up champ.

Ponzi. You know and I know you're all gum flapping.

You're the clown online who says: I'll show you! And then your card gets pulled and you claim: "I rainchecked".

Just as expected of a 10+ year kj.

Lmao

 

[guru1000]

I don't think three hours of cardio a week is that difficult to maintain.

Diet has always been a weak spot for me, so you might have me there. You named a very specific diet, so I answered what I thought was the spirit of the question. I go in phases. Sometimes I eat whatever I want, sometimes I go on very strict diets (I've tried a lot of different ones), sometimes I just try to steer my eating habits in a healthier direction. But the point is I do this whether or not I'm in a relationship. It's not all about impressing women, although that can be a powerful motivator

You better step up your game Zekko. Otherwise your girl will leave you due to hypergamy when she finds a guy who diets methodically. According to SoSuave these days, it’s not a question of if but a question of when

 

[user43770]

Kind of like asking, “hey Guru, why make that extra mil, you don’t need it.”

Because I can.

Not at all. A million dollars will make way more of a difference in your life than a lack of subcataneous water.

You're just being gay.

 

[guru1000]

Not at all. A million dollars will make way more of a difference in your life than a lack of subcataneous water.

You're just being gay.

Yup a handsome, bodybuilding, wealthy faggot. I’ll try to deal with it.

 

[user43770]

Yup a handsome, bodybuilding, wealthy faggot. I’ll try to deal with it.

More power to ya.

My problem is that you constantly spout off things that are ridiculous.

 

[guru1000]

More power to ya.

My problem is that you constantly spout off things that are ridiculous.

Glad that’s your problem. I doubt I’ll remember your name in the morning.

Just remind me where we left off next time.

 

[Sub]

Yup a handsome, bodybuilding, wealthy faggot. I’ll try to deal with it.

More like a Jewish ex con that's spent over 10+ years spewing flip flopping word salad nonsense on an anonymous forum trying to pretend he's "too busy" to meet women offline while posting constantly and being on every old site known to man.

Dude if you're getting manicures and cosmetic surgery you were wifey in the joint.


Problem is you're too stupid to realize what an insecure clown you are. For shame.

 

[guru1000]

NN, what is it Guru can give you? You’re not getting another date to meet Guru, so lose those high hopes cupcake.

I didn’t know 40-year old guineas from the Bronx were permitted disability checks without being shamed out the Hood. What would the spagetti heads say, heh?

Do you need a job?

 

[Sub]

NN, what is it Guru can give you? You’re not getting another date to meet Guru, so lose those high hopes cupcake.

I didn’t know 40-year old guineas from the Bronx were permitted disability checks without being shamed out the Hood. What would the spagetti heads say, heh?

Do you need a job?

Looks like you need a job Horowitz as you are the ex con attempting to run a "consulting" scam on an anonymous forum.

Sue me punk. Sue so suave. Sue ip addresses ya broke queens bum. Lmao

 

[Sub]

You better step up your game Zekko. Otherwise your girl will leave you due to hypergamy when she finds a guy who diets methodically. According to SoSuave these days, it’s not a question of if but a question of when

Sounds like a beta male cry for help.

Guys I diet methodically but I don't do it to get the approval of women. Like I don't humblebrag male fan fiction for 10+ years to get the approval of an anonymous forum. Like I don't get manicures, cosmetic surgery, hair plugs and spend stolen money for the approval of chicks looking for money online.

You believe me guys right? Swear I don't it's all for my frame! Lmfao

 

[zekko]

You better step up your game Zekko. Otherwise your girl will leave you due to hypergamy when she finds a guy who diets methodically. According to SoSuave these days, it’s not a question of if but a question of when

Eh, my mindset has always been that I'm not relying on her to stay anyway. These days, at my age, I'm just thankful that I'm still breathing.
I've never been one to try to impress women. Maybe that's to my detriment, but I figure they're either going to like me or they're not. Let the chips fall where they may.

By the way, Guru, better watch the wealth accumulation. I notice they're still trying to put it around here that if you have money, then women will only see you as a beta provider type, and their vaginas will dry up.

 

[Tenacity]

“When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should be smart, opinionated and ambitious. Someone who values fairness and expects or, even better, wants to do his share in the home. These men exist and, trust me, over time, nothing is sexier.”

― Sheryl Sandberg, Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead

alffaa fuxxcksszzz, beyta buckssszzzzzzzz lol

there it is boys. open hypergamy in all its glory.

not only is it socially acceptable today, it is OUTRIGHT PREACHED to women by women

@guru1000 you should read this post. You might call it MGTOW crazy talk, but I just think the dating market is a SCAM today for the majority of men on the "settling down" side.

Just about every woman (including your description of a unicorn Guru) has been running around svcking, fvcking, all types of loser men, US Senators, the mail man, the gay man, the straight man, the comedian man, and any other type of dude that makes her "feel good" in the moment.

Then she gets to around 30, becomes overly religious, and now is seeking to "settle down".

It's a scam. MGTOW is literally just exposing the scam dating market for what it is, so guys are equipped with the information to do whatever it is they feel they NEED to do going forward.

For me, it's continuing to spin plates until they fall off. That is the best approach to this scam dating market. No legal relationships at all. It allows you go get the FVCK OUT when that chick starts acting crazy, trying to control your money, etc.

 

[guru1000]

Tenacity, Sheryl Sandberg is a feminist teaching women to exploit the “Sex In the City” operandi.

I give her as much consideration as I did my shlt this morning.

These types of women I sniff out and discard after a few minutes of talk.

 

[Tenacity]

Tenacity, Sheryl Sandberg is a feminist teaching women to exploit the “Sex In the City” operandi.

I give her as much consideration as I did my shlt this morning.

These types of women I sniff out and discard after a few minutes of talk.

But you still really haven't disclosed any benefits or rewards that I as a Man would get.....by marrying....that I'm not already getting from not being married?

Can you name any such benefits or rewards? Or, are the only things to be acquired are potential social and financial advantages should I MARRY UP? In addition, I get to keep my "unicorn" from breaking up with me after the 3 year dating cycle where she sees I'm not going to ever marry her?

If those are seriously the only things I could acquire, I would rather keep my freedom and not put anything at risk for such trivial "potential" gains.

 

[guru1000]

You don’t need Guru’s permission not to LTR or marry.

If it doesn’t serve you, don’t do it.

I’m not even sure if I would marry again, but I’m open to it if a scenario presented itself to serve my personal and business interests. I care not of the “financial risks,” as no court will set aside MY prenup given my litigious background and my comprehensive understanding of my jurisdiction in prep of the prenup, and in the unlikely event a court did, my post-marital assets being found and secured is akin to you trying to find a pebble in a cave in Zimbabwe. Even then the pebble would be secured by the Navy. I would settle out of court for $1. I’m not kidding.

 

[Tenacity]

You don’t need Guru’s permission not to LTR or marry.

If it doesn’t serve you, don’t do it.

I’m not even sure if I would marry again, but I’m open to it if a scenario presented itself to serve my personal and business interests. I care not of the “financial risks,” as no court will set aside MY prenup given my litigious background and my comprehensive understanding of my jurisdiction in prep of the prenup, and in the unlikely event a court did, my post-marital assets being found and secured is akin to you trying to find a pebble in a cave in Zimbabwe. Even then the pebble would be secured by the Navy. I would settle out of court for $1. I’m not kidding.

Yeah you've mentioned before that IF you did it, you have this super Pre-Nup/Incorporation structure that's impossible for a chick to break into. I guess if you can manage to do that, it would be great in terms of reducing risks.

- My first question to you is this....are you familiar with the way many Pre-Nups get set aside? It's basically where a chick gets pregnant and decides to stay home with the kids for "X" number of years. Once the divorce takes place, she will argue that her marketplace skills were destroyed and thus, should be able to secure a portion of all future earnings. What legal structure do you have to combat that?

- Second question is this.....I have not met any woman that was even halfway decent that would agree out of the gate to signing a Pre-Nup. So you mentioned before that if a chick won't sign it, you will NEXT HER. But with the very limited amount of women that would even be in the running for a marriage, wouldn't you eventually run out of prospects?

 

[Sub]

You don’t need Guru’s permission not to LTR or marry.

If it doesn’t serve you, don’t do it.

I’m not even sure if I would marry again, but I’m open to it if a scenario presented itself to serve my personal and business interests. I care not of the “financial risks,” as no court will set aside MY prenup given my litigious background and my comprehensive understanding of my jurisdiction in prep of the prenup, and in the unlikely event a court did, my post-marital assets being found and secured is akin to you trying to find a pebble in a cave in Zimbabwe. Even then the pebble would be secured by the Navy. I would settle out of court for $1. I’m not kidding.

That’s odd “Guru”, one would wonder why a man of your “caliber” would need a pre-nup especially since you should be able to land yourself a trust fund baby or some other wealthy young woman rather than needing a pre-nup as if you already expect to marry a lower class gold digger.


Would you be so adamant in signing a pre-nup if she had millions upon millions of dollars before you met? Of course not. You would be looking for a come up.

 

[guru1000]

Yeah you've mentioned before that IF you did it, you have this super Pre-Nup/Incorporation structure that's impossible for a chick to break into. I guess if you can manage to do that, it would be great in terms of reducing risks.

- My first question to you is this....are you familiar with the way many Pre-Nups get set aside? It's basically where a chick gets pregnant and decides to stay home with the kids for "X" number of years. Once the divorce takes place, she will argue that her marketplace skills were destroyed and thus, should be able to secure a portion of all future earnings. What legal structure do you have to combat that?

- Second question is this.....I have not met any woman that was even halfway decent that would agree out of the gate to signing a Pre-Nup. So you mentioned before that if a chick won't sign it, you will NEXT HER. But with the very limited amount of women that would even be in the running for a marriage, wouldn't you eventually run out of prospects?

As to the first part, a well-written prenup should make allowances for not only the division of post-marital assets, but all contingencies, variances, incidentals, limitations, subsequent unconscionability of terms, unforeseeable events or circumstances, and estate upon your death. Her loss of wealth and marketable skills should she stay home is subsumed in clear language within this. Of course, the prenup must be “fair” as defined by your jurisdiction, so it should include some type of payoff if she didn’t work, tended to your lineage after X years of marriage while you went out there to freely take over the world, so ensure her value to you accounts for that.

As to the second part, you state “out of the gate.” Does this mean you are raising this topic before she pushes for LTR or marriage. This is the wrong way to go about it.

First she pushes for exclusivity.

Next she pushes with, “Where is this going?”

Then she pushes for marriage. Assuming you’re interested to pursue this At this point, tell her, “ I’m not keen with the state having power over our marriage. Let’s have a religious ceremony and hold ourselves out as a married couple.” Some women will be fine with this.

If she pushes for the marriage license and you are willing to entertain this, only then do you proceed with, “marriage under the state is a very precarious endeavor. In the event anything changes between you and I, we must ensure you and I are protected and in agreement and not subject to an inequitable court system that could work against you or me, and serve the best interests of our kids. I’ll have my attorney prepare a prenup and we’ll retain a separate attorney for you to ensure it’s fair ... for the both of us.”

If she declines the prenup, dump her or string her along until she leaves. She’s after resources as her “need” is contrived.

 

[guru1000]

That’s odd “Guru”, one would wonder why a man of your “caliber” would need a pre-nup especially since you should be able to land yourself a trust fund baby or some other wealthy young woman rather than needing a pre-nup as if you already expect to marry a lower class gold digger.


Would you be so adamant in signing a pre-nup if she had millions upon millions of dollars before you met? Of course not. You would be looking for a come up.

Unfortunately, I don’t meet any hot trust fund babies in their 20s. If I did, the prenup would be pushed on her end, not mine.

In NYC, I’m not a prince. Many guys like me.

But marrying up is definitely a solid reason to marry.

 

[Tenacity]

As to the first part, a well-written prenup should make allowances for not only the division of post-marital assets, but all contingencies, variances, incidentals, limitations, subsequent unconscionability of terms, unforeseeable events or circumstances, and estate upon your death. Her loss of wealth and marketable skills should she stay home is subsumed in clear language within this. Of course, the prenup must be “fair” as defined by your jurisdiction, so it should include some type of payoff if she didn’t work, tended to your lineage after X years of marriage while you went out there to freely take over the world, so ensure her value to you accounts for that.

The underlined portion is the main focus point. Because I would have to be at the mercy of the Family Court to determine what "fair" means, and I'll let you take a GUESS on how that would likely end up for me as a man.

As to the second part, you state “out of the gate.” Does this mean you are raising this topic before she pushes for LTR or marriage. This is the wrong way to go about it.

No, out of the gate means that a lot of the chicks I'm spinning/dating right now are over the age of 26/27. You know what that means right? It means they are in that "trying to settle down stage" which means the conversation centers around marriage and 99.98% of them clearly state they would never sign a Prenup....because their rationale is that asking them to sign a Prenup means I am predicting the marriage will end.

First she pushes for exclusivity.

Next she pushes with, “Where is this going?”

Then she pushes for marriage. Assuming you’re interested to pursue this At this point, tell her, “ I’m not keen with the state having power over our marriage. Let’s have a religious ceremony and hold ourselves out as a married couple.” Some women will be fine with this.

What American Woman is going to be fine with this Guru?? please go try this on Tyquesha.

If she pushes for the marriage license and you are willing to entertain this, only then do you proceed with, “marriage under the state is a very precarious endeavor. In the event anything changes between you and I, we must ensure you and I are protected and in agreement and not subject to an inequitable court system that could work against you or me, and serve the best interests of our kids. I’ll have my attorney prepare a prenup and we’ll retain a separate attorney for you to ensure it’s fair ... for the both of us.”

They aren't going for that Sir lol. Again, they clearly state they would never sign a Prenup....because their rationale is that asking them to sign a Prenup means I am predicting the marriage will end.

If she declines the prenup, dump her or string her along until she leaves. .

This is what I've been doing, but you said because I was the ONLY COMMONALITY in all of these relationships....then this must all be my fault. I must be doing something wrong. That's what you said.