Just a Shot Away
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 648
- Reaction score
- 19
I wasn't arguing for or against anything...The Piano Master said:Eh, he still wins. This argument is a little flat.
I wasn't arguing for or against anything...The Piano Master said:Eh, he still wins. This argument is a little flat.
Just arguing for the sake of arguing, huh?Just a Shot Away said:I wasn't arguing for or against anything...
In a somewhat twist of irony, it turned out that she ended up not sleeping with him for a few reasons...but didn't let me know until our LAST day. Can you believe that garbage? I mean, what's the point, right? I don't know. Women are freakin' crazy.Gangster Of Love said:For the sake of argument, who's to say that she wouldn't just lie to OP about her NOT having sex with her husband? If she knows that he is so insecure about the possibility of somebody else being insde her and can't handle it, all she needs to do is say she didn't have sex with him, even if she did. Even if she swallowed him the very first day he was home. Who are we kidding here?
:crackup:Just a Shot Away said:...how I can deal with my disgust of sleeping with a girl that just got railed the day prior I would like to hear it.
This is not an industry. This is your life. If you want something worthwhile you have to struggle for it. That's called chasing your dream. Settling is not chasing. It's exactly the opposite.Just a Shot Away said:I never said I was settling, I said I'm taking whatever I can get right now. That's how it works in the entertainment industry when you're just starting out.
What a breakdown. For example, based on what I know about you, your 9 is my 6. So that skews the results to hell already. Also, did you take into account variables in population distributions? For example, Canada and Japan have aging populations, China has 35million bachelors and not enough women of age... etc.The 1-10 point system that men use to rate the physical attractiveness of women is based on percentages. For example, a 6 is better-looking than 60% of the women you pass on the street. A 9 means that only 1 in 10 women in the world are of equal attractiveness or better than her. So after taking the number of women in the world between 18 and 40 (a nice age range for viable targets), I then took 20% of this number and it works out to around 350 million.
Ok. What units is confidence measured in? And how do you measure it accurately? Can this compound be extracted and purified for more accurate measurement? Or is it a physical quality, in which case, what does it look like?Anyway, the scientific method was used to determine what qualities attract female animals to males. In these experiments, confidence and its derivatives registered off the charts.
You know what, you're right. Looks don't matter at all. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go shave my well kept hair and put on 30lbs of fat. The next girl that I'll be with will see past the cheese encrusted day old shirt I'm using to clean the drool off my now fat and pimply face (who gives a fvck about table manners I'm just an animal). She'll be so hot, it's gonna make up for both of us. And she'll be with me because I have confidence!I'm sure you would pay for the plane ticket, hotel, and miss weeks of work to do a domestic violence stakeout. Anyone who doesn't is "pathetic." Oh, and anybody who doesn't see humans as animals doesn't know the first thing about biology. Such a person probably has a variety of ill-conceived notions about how the world works. This person may even believe that looks matter to women, for example.
Scraping the bottom of the barrel eh? Well, I guess someone has to do it.Partly for practice, and partly because those are the girls that are "for" me right now. The hotties are for guys with confidence and game.
Well, since I never gave any indication of what I find physically attractive in a woman you have no basis for this. Just because I'll sleep with a 6.5 doesn't mean I don't find 9's hot anymore.Alle_Gory said:What a breakdown. For example, based on what I know about you, your 9 is my 6. So that skews the results to hell already.
Of course it's impossible to measure just how many women in the world between the ages of 18 and 40 are viable sexual targets. That's why I was careful to use the word "about." I give a margin of error of about 50 million people here. But again, this is completely irrelevant to the topic at hand. I was simply illustrating why it's not surprising at all that guys with no self esteem or confidence don't get the girls. Oh, and I aced stats with very little studying and while staring at the hottie's legs that sat next to me out of the corner of my eye for the majority of the period.Also, did you take into account variables in population distributions?
So many assumptions and subjective variables. I'm sure your Stats professor is ashamed.
You're barking up the wrong tree. Check out ebscohost.com, which is one of my favorite databases of scientific journals. All your answers are right there. If you think I'm going to sit here and explain to you how the scientific method works you are very much mistaken.Ok. What units is confidence measured in? And how do you measure it accurately? Can this compound be extracted and purified for more accurate measurement? Or is it a physical quality, in which case, what does it look like?
You're still unable to discern the difference between appearance and looks, even after months of struggling with the concept. Appearance makes a huge difference. Clothes? Hygiene? Hairstyle? All very important. Facial symmetry/bone structure? The effect on female attraction is negligible.You know what, you're right. Looks don't matter at all. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go shave my well kept hair...cheese encrusted day old shirt...
I don't know why guys that can get girls take so much pleasure in rubbing it in the guys' faces who cannot. I've never found the urge to taunt blind guys for being born not able to see, or jogging in place in front of people in wheelchairs to mock their inability to walk. Very peculiar behavior, this.Scraping the bottom of the barrel eh? Well, I guess someone has to do it.
You mean you memorized a few problems and regurgitated on the exam.Just a Shot Away said:I aced stats with very little studying
I don't expect you to explain to me anything you don't understand. This is what happens when you memorize some facts and think you're smart.If you think I'm going to sit here and explain to you how the scientific method works you are very much mistaken.
No one mentioned anything about bone structure in this thread. It's sh*t like this that prevents you from getting laid. People don't talk like this.Facial symmetry/bone structure? The effect on female attraction is negligible.
Hitting on fat chicks is a choice, not a condition like blindness or paralysis.I've never found the urge to taunt blind guys for being born not able to see, or jogging in place in front of people in wheelchairs to mock their inability to walk. Very peculiar behavior, this.
You're rating scale doesn't work. Here's why: Using your scale, there would be an equal amount of women in each percentile. For example, if you took a random sample of 100 women, you would have 10 HB 1's, 10 HB 2's, 10 HB 3's, etc... In effect you assume that there would an equal distribution of women on the 1-10 scale.Just a Shot Away said:The 1-10 point system that men use to rate the physical attractiveness of women is based on percentages. For example, a 6 is better-looking than 60% of the women you pass on the street. A 9 means that only 1 in 10 women in the world are of equal attractiveness or better than her. So after taking the number of women in the world between 18 and 40 (a nice age range for viable targets), I then took 20% of this number and it works out to around 350 million.
No, like I said...I did very little studying. I already had an innate understanding of statistics (this is where we come back to the long straw/short straw concept) and didn't really need to do the homework.Alle_Gory said:You mean you memorized a few problems and regurgitated on the exam...Congratulations, you have a good enough short term memory to cram for an exam.
The results of my most recent IQ test aside, it doesn't take a genius to know that female attraction triggers differ from that of males.This is what happens when you memorize some facts and think you're smart.
You said looks don't matter in a brief tirade of sarcasm. Looks are based in large part on one's bone structure. I fail to see how pointing out how someone is wrong about looks mattering to women helps kill female attraction toward me, especially when I don't do it in person unless asked or provoked.No one mentioned anything about bone structure in this thread. It's sh*t like this that prevents you from getting laid. People don't talk like this.
Agreed. Fortunately, I didn't say that hitting on fat chicks was a choice so I don't have to retract any previous statements. My comment about you and those of your ilk enjoying taunting those less fortunate than yourself was in reference to the ability to get girls, not the condition of being on the same level of the fatties.Hitting on fat chicks is a choice, not a condition like blindness or paralysis
No. HB9 just means that she is better looking than 90% of the female population, without any reference to how many HB9's there are. So let's say we grab a handful of women off the streets of New York. We end up with 100 women, and of these women we manage to luck out and get 90 HB8's and 10 HB9's. Just because there aren't an equal amount of women that are better looking than 80% of the female population as there are that are better looking than 90% of the population doesn't mean that these chicks are suddenly NOT better looking than 80/90% of the female population. It just means that you must be in an area that has very good-looking women. You may find the reverse sample in Ethiopia, for example. You may pull out 90 HB2's, 10 HB1's. Similarly, just because we can say that Bill Gates has more money than 99.9% of the world's population doesn't mean that there has to be an equal amount of people in his tax bracket as there are people on Welfare.machoalex said:Using your scale, there would be an equal amount of women in each percentile.
You just switched your argument completely. You just made my point for me. Thank you. http://www.sosuave.net/forum/images/smilies//cheer.gifJust a Shot Away said:No. HB9 just means that she is better looking than 90% of the female population, without any reference to how many HB9's there are. So let's say we grab a handful of women off the streets of New York. We end up with 100 women, and of these women we manage to luck out and get 90 HB8's and 10 HB9's. Just because there aren't an equal amount of women that are better looking than 80% of the female population as there are that are better looking than 90% of the population doesn't mean that these chicks are suddenly NOT better looking than 80/90% of the female population. It just means that you must be in an area that has very good-looking women. You may find the reverse sample in Ethiopia, for example. You may pull out 90 HB2's, 10 HB1's. Similarly, just because we can say that Bill Gates has more money than 99.9% of the world's population doesn't mean that there has to be an equal amount of people in his tax bracket as there are people on Welfare.
Congratulations. That still doesn't mean you know sh*t about women. The only thing the IQ test does is serve your ego. Your weak, fragile ego.Just a Shot Away said:The results of my most recent IQ test aside, it doesn't take a genius to know that female attraction triggers differ from that of males.
This entire thing you're doing is what's killing women's attraction. Like I said, people don't talk like this.Looks are based in large part on one's bone structure. I fail to see how pointing out how someone is wrong about looks mattering to women helps kill female attraction toward me, especially when I don't do it in person unless asked or provoked.
No, no it does not. Please re-read what machoalex wrote. If you disagree with it, then go to your stats professor or his TA. That's why they're there. To teach your dumb ass statistics.No. HB9 just means that she is better looking than 90% of the female population, without any reference to how many HB9's there are.
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.
What can you do though, there will always be others who put themselves first no matter what.harkkam08 said:Having sex with married women, well personally I wouldn't ever do it. But thats just me only because my morals wont allow me.
But to sleep with a woman married to a man who is serving in the military, if you told me that story at a bar, I would drop your ass to the floor. I have friends in the military and its *******s like you that cause our veterans to go over the deep end. They risk their lives so they can come home to their wives and even though its the wives fault for going and looking for strange.
The men who **** them are just as low life scum as well. I hope he finds your ass.
...no. Machoalex got you and you know it.Just a Shot Away said:No. HB9 just means that she is better looking than 90% of the female population, without any reference to how many HB9's there are. So let's say we grab a handful of women off the streets of New York. We end up with 100 women, and of these women we manage to luck out and get 90 HB8's and 10 HB9's. Just because there aren't an equal amount of women that are better looking than 80% of the female population as there are that are better looking than 90% of the population doesn't mean that these chicks are suddenly NOT better looking than 80/90% of the female population. It just means that you must be in an area that has very good-looking women. You may find the reverse sample in Ethiopia, for example. You may pull out 90 HB2's, 10 HB1's. Similarly, just because we can say that Bill Gates has more money than 99.9% of the world's population doesn't mean that there has to be an equal amount of people in his tax bracket as there are people on Welfare.
I like how you are always trying to steer discussions towards the never ending "Looks Matter/Don't Matter" debate. I thought this thread was about banging some dumb married broad with a stretched out kooter, not about facial symmetry, bone structure, and all that other looks don't matter jazz you're always spouting off about.Just a Shot Away said:Right. I'm sure you would pay for the plane ticket, hotel, and miss weeks of work to do a domestic violence stakeout. Anyone who doesn't is "pathetic." Oh, and anybody who doesn't see humans as animals doesn't know the first thing about biology. Such a person probably has a variety of ill-conceived notions about how the world works. This person may even believe that looks matter to women, for example.
It doesn't matter how good-looking you are, how romantic you are, how funny you are... or anything else. If she doesn't have something INVESTED in you and the relationship, preferably quite a LOT invested, she'll dump you, without even the slightest hesitation, as soon as someone a little more "interesting" comes along.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.