Let this be a lesson in "chick logic" vs REAL logic
Probably my last post to iqqi, because she clearly doesn't know jack$hit, at least from a male POV, and will NEVER admit the male POV has any truth to it. I've edited it to make it shorter so even iqqi can read it.
This thread is an example of "Chick Logic" in action and it is one of the few predictible things about women.
Originally posted by PlayerinTraining
You immediately assume negative generalizations about women are AUTOMATICALLY incorrect.
iqqi: where did i ever say this?
My general statement is that women generally speaking, have unrealistic expectations of men. I provided an example of 2 women I work with. You disagreed. You wrote (direct quote):
who is THEM? and maybe you are taking it a little too seriously. a lot of people make blanket statements, but the thing is they don't really believe it, and it is usually funny, because it is somewhat true at first appearance, but not completely.
"Maybe I'm taking 'it' a bit too seriously." Most NORMAL people would interpret your statement "it" to mean "Maybe you are taking those 2 women a little too seriously. A lot of people make blanket statements, but don't really believe it."
CAN YOU UNDERSTAND THIS SO FAR?????? These are you own words...
Your statement assumes my perception of these two women is wrong, even though I have knowledge of context, behavior, etc. Your statements ASSUME the male perception of things is wrong.
YOUR VERY ACT OF DISPUTING MY POST, and the way you do it, proves my point--that women a) think pretty similarly, that a man can predict how a woman will typically respond, and b) expect too much of men.
CAN YOU UNDERSTAND THIS SO FAR??????
These are ALSO your own words.
When I point this out, you realize YOUR ACTIONS (assuming my male POV is incorrect) and the way you do it (not addressing my comments with counter-examples, reason, etc.) only prove my point, so you shift gears, and write:
where did you get that? i said A LOT OF PEOPLE, not those two chics specifically. those two chics specifically would fall under "and you will leave ones like that behind and find ones less superficial and confused"
On one hand I take those 2 chicks "too seriously." Then you claim you NEVER said "You take those chicks too seriously."
There proof is in the posts. You had contradicted yourself, time and again.
These are your own words.
NOW DO YOU GET IT YET?????
The key point:
You constantly flip-flop, based purely on whim. Women do this all the time, act all frustrated andsay "Men don't listen."
Men listen all too well. The trouble with nice men is THAT WE LISTEN ALL TO WELL. The most successful men IGNORE MOST of what women say.
But, they also make women think they are really listening!
Women really don't know how to communicate. Maybe they really HAVE nothing to communicate? Maybe they can't communicate what they want BECAUSE THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW?!
This is a typical male/female disagreement. The woman will ALWAYS change the MEANING of what she said/meant/did in the past, in order for it to conform to her PRESENT needs, wishes, and desires.
AND SHE WILL DENY THIS TO THE END OF TIME!!!
This is why you cannot take the rejection of women seriously. They can be all over you one minute, the next minute they can distain you. Then they can flip-flop back to loving you again.
[rest of post deleted]
I think I've proven my point.
