Guys who don't have to do anything are called naturals. Game has always been for guys who didn't have the looks to attract a lot of women naturally. Some have called Game the male counterpart to feminism, which has been said to benefit unattractive women. If you aren't attractive, a woman isn't going to care about your internal dominance, she probably won't even notice you.
I've never had the looks to be able to attract women solely on that basis, no matter how in shape I was. Usually they have to get to know me a little first. I mean I have attracted women on looks alone before, but it isn't going to happen often enough to be satisfying. That's why they call it "getting lucky".
I'm not big on using game tactics though, I'm not looking to trick women or manipulate them into having sex with me. The most important thing for me is to keep a strong frame, and to be myself. This way I've been able to get women on my wavelength, without looking like a weirdo PUA. The main thing is that women want strength, so encourage strong traits within yourself, and discourage weakness (in all its forms). This isn't only to get women, it's to your benefit also, because men are naturally designed to be masculine. So pursue it, and own it.
From what I've seen, short women like tall guys just as much as taller women. Short women might feel more vulnerable and have trouble reaching things. A tall man gives them protection and some of the advantages they are missing out on because of their height. But they still have to look up to a man who isn't that tall, so I guess the odds would be better with a 5'2" woman than a 5'11" woman.
Those so called naturals you see during high school usually ends up as losers even with their good looks etc when they're well into their adult life.
As for game, it's highly misleading and downright wrong to get young men to conform to it.
Many will end up delusional and bitter should they take up this path.
It is highly irresponsible for us to guide men down that road.
The reason is simple.
Game for all intents and purposes MUST = ur inherently born traits (passive/dominant) + ur childhood upbringing AND how you think AND how you do things in real life.
Each influences the other.
But that is also ur frame.
Since a man cannot change his inherent traits nor can he change his upbringing then the only thing he could do is change "how he thinks" to influence "how he does things".
If he were to absorb PUA teaching into "how he thinks", it will not necessarily be in sync with the other parts of his frame, hence failure.
That's why you keep on seeing brilliant young men here, who has read the DJ Bible from top to bottom countless of times still not making headway, because it doesn't suit to their particular inherent trait/upbringing.
The only viable solution that works for ALL type of men is by learning MASCULINITY.
Masculinity is just a code of conduct.
And masculinity has always been attractive to women no matter her age.
Even grannies love masculine men, even babies love em.
Does this finally makes sense to you Zekko?
how did you pull that off without being a Super Chad? those women I'm sure have a HUGE ego.
