I'd Say yes 99 percent are good only for sex!
But, thats what they were made for, so I don't give it much thought these days.
"Are Women Becoming Redundant?
Women Lie, Cheat and Steal Figures showed one woman in two would not tell her man that the baby she was carrying was not his - if she wanted to stay with him. They also said four out of ten (42%) would lie about contraception in order to get pregnant, in spite of the wishes of their partner.
Women lie, cheat and steal?
Noooo.
Surely not? - say 400 million castrated dipsticks living in the western world.
Sugar and spice, and all things nice, this is what women are made of, according to these hapless grinning buffoons.
But what are sugar and spice, eh?
They are just stuff that tastes good.
And that's about it.
And even then, they only taste good when you are hungry.
And, let's face it, if you are hungry then even a bowl of stewed stodgy meatloaf infested with poisonous microbes and slimy funguses can taste pretty good.
Listen carefully.
Basically, women were designed by Nature to taste good to men when they are hungry; and that, fundamentally, is the end of the matter.
The Universe does not seem to have figured out any other long term purpose for them.
And even the ancients clearly recognised this by emphasising the important bits of women in their sculptures. ...
LOL!
Yes. Yes. OK. For a while women were pretty good as warm baby bags into which the offspring of men could be implanted and grown. But those bags are shortly going to be replaced by some amazing bio-technological creations that will provide much better bags at a fraction of the cost - and at an even smaller fraction of the aggravation!
What the womb can do today, someone like Bill Gates can do tomorrow.
And when this happens, it's all over.
Women's Rights?
Finito.
Women will just taste good to hungry men.
And that's the only bargaining chip that they'll have.
After all, apart from baby baggery and tasting good, what can a woman do that a man cannot do better?
Sweet.
F##k.
All.
... Is the correct answer.
Realistically, women have only got one hope when it comes to having a happy future. They will have to learn to cater for their men in a way in which other men cannot do. And if they do not do this, then they are toast; because they will have nothing else to offer.
The converse, however, is not true.
Men do not have to taste good to women to be of value to them.
Without men - nothing.
No houses or factories would be built or maintained. No roads would be constructed.
Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc.
Nothing!
It is men who create, construct, develop, operate and maintain just about everything that represents the progress of humans on this planet.
Fundamentally, in essence, and going to the nub of it all, what the future holds for women will boil down to this.
They will have to taste good to men.
They will have nothing else going for them.
And if they do not taste good to men then there will be no point in men having them around.
To summarise: When their baby baggery days are over - which is not so very far away - women will have to offer men something that other men cannot offer them.
As such, they alienate men at their peril.
Of course, a fine supper that tastes good is always a joy to have. But; one can always live quite happily without one or, better still, find other meals that are equally satisfying.
And, quite frankly, if women are going to lie, cheat and steal - as per the above survey - not to mention all the other horrible things that they get up to - then it really does look as if they are heading for a fall of considerable magnitude.
And, while on this particular aspect of the subject, it is worth noting that these vindictive women - particularly the penis-envying feminists and their hysterical penis-fearing counterparts working in the abuse industry - who continually stir up hatred toward men in one way or another are setting their whole gender up for the most monumental backlash against women.
Ordinary women should not be supporting these people if they value their own skins.
And the same goes for those politically-corrected short-sighted narrow-minded buffoons - particularly of the male variety - who keep trying to protect 'women' with their various inane platitudes about them.
They will simply be contributing to this backlash.
Loosely speaking, if enough men feel that they are being cheated, lied to, disempowered, demonised or discriminated against etc etc, then there is going to be trouble!
Big.
Trouble.
It is as simple as that, really.
A good example of this is the new law in France making it an imprisonable offence to insult homosexuals or women.
This will not help women in the long run. On balance, it will simply end up hurting them badly.
But the authorities have not yet really quite cottoned on to what is going on out here. They think that they can continue to get away with blithely trampling upon everybody's freedoms and with turning heterosexual men into fourth class citizens.
But they are going to be in for a terrible shock in the not too distant future when they discover that they no longer have the ability to dictate to others on certain matters without opening up very serious threats to themselves or to their own loved ones.
"You take away my child, and I'll take away yours."
That sort of thing.
Men are not going to continue putting up with the mistreatment that they are currently receiving at the hands of the authorities.
And one thing that these authorities will NEVER be able to protect themselves from is the men's movement.
This is just not possible.
The movement is infiltrating itself everywhere.
Yes. Progress is painfully slow. But it is happening. And it is happening everywhere.
The consciousness of 'men' is expanding.
The organism is growing. And it will dwarf absolutely any other organism on this planet.
It is only a question of time.
Now - get your thinking caps on - of the forces that are going to arise via the men's movement, those arising both from the love and the hate of women will combine together to form a monumental drive to disempower them - at least as far as men's own personal relationships with them are concerned.
(And those sitting somewhere between the two ends of this love-hate continuum are not very likely to have the motivation to oppose such a drive.)
Furthermore, given that most women much prefer to have relationships with males who are dominant over them, most women are not going to be at all averse to the notion that men should be dominant over their women.
(Indeed, it is only because the distorted and deluded fantasies of feminists and other non-women have been inflicted unilaterally upon us for so long that this desire of women to be dominated by their men has been hidden from view; e.g. see Women and Chimps.)
And so it is that the forces building up in favour of destroying the feminists' hopes that women will be as dominant as men are going to be extremely large.
Putting it all rather bluntly: If women continue trying to be men, then they are going to end up being very inferior men indeed, and they are forever going to fight a losing battle
In summary: It is in the general natures of both men and women to desire dominance in the male and submissiveness in the female. It is also the case that females are shortly going to lose their monopoly when it comes to bearing babies, which means that they are going to have to provide men with something that other men cannot provide if they are to be of any value to them. Put together; this all suggests that women are going to have to behave more like women than like men, or they will find themselves heading for a fall of considerable magnitude.
And so it is, Dear Reader, that in the not too-distant future, by hook or by crook, western women will start to taste good again.
Or else ..."
By Angry Harry
Sn
