Any female djs on this site?
- Thread starter still the one
- Start date
Yes Uhh! (You sound very intellectual, by the way.)Originally posted by B9
Uhh.....
Knowing this is 99% of the battle towards controlling it. Men who understand and accept this are the best. They are the ones who truly know how to deal with women.
penkitten
Master Don Juan
i'm still here
Miss Anthropic
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2003
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
Personally, I'm a self-directed catalyst for the advancement of Spontaneous Evolution. Initially I was doing some research on the 'Don Juan as Sociopath' theory which led me here. And yes, this would mark my first post.
Because the majority seem clueless with regards to what it is that a woman really wants, I remain as duty to the species as a whole in the hopes that I might assist in availing at least some with that elusive quality which the women you desire most seeks in a man; and which for the better part seems to be sadly lacking (or at the least demonstrated as virtue) on this forum:
Spines.
Welcome to the forum.
See guys? They are not all windbags who blow smoke up your ass!
Although this chicks very analytical manner of speech almost makes me feel like she is really a man for some reason..
Miss Anthropic, I am afraid I will have to see some nude pics to vouch for your authenticity!
Miss Anthropic
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2003
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
DonRonny cluckingly extolled:
However.
Nude pics shall not be forthcoming until you can make me want to give them to you. She also coyly notes no one thus far has risen up to this particular challenge.
Nevertheless: Your move.
Miss Anthropic graciously thanks you for your warm welcome and blushes modestly at your suspicions of her gender understanding only too well the decided lack of logic that is displayed in most violent femmes of her gentle persuasion.
However.
Nude pics shall not be forthcoming until you can make me want to give them to you. She also coyly notes no one thus far has risen up to this particular challenge.
Nevertheless: Your move.
I am usually wary of chicks who refer to themselves in the third person and challenge anonymous males to virtually get in her knickers.
However.
I find your motivation VERY intriguing and as you can see I have started up a thread to help you with your thesis, and perhaps help us gain a better understanding of ourselves. The move is decidedly yours m´lady. (Although I have yet to be convinced of your femininity)
Miss Anthropic
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2003
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
DonRonny misspelled 'eloquently' and then stumbled:
But she notes dryly: You decry 'mindless stereotypes' in your Helpful Post and then lump me in with some sot of an idea that you have with regards to women and how they should behave?
We wrinkle our nose disdainfully.
I'm weary entirely with this antiquated ideology of virtue that women should possess when really, all any Don Juan seeks to do anyway (and this in the context of the archetype of Don Juan, which I shall post on tomorrow. It is an ungodly hour, after all, and Miss Anthropic even while kicking the butt of socialized moray does admittedly need her beauty sleep) is ruin it.
The challenge stands simply because Miss Anthropic wears a steel reinforced corset and wields a rapier wit.
And is still not making plans to display those ripe plums just yet, which surely will wither if she does not commence to the wooing of her sheets, despite your evident albeit ineffectual charms.
(Yawn.
Queen to Bednow, rogue;
Check.)
.
Which you should be. The women of my sort are not exactly the whimpering comehither fodder on which you have endeavoured to refine your seductive manuevers.
But she notes dryly: You decry 'mindless stereotypes' in your Helpful Post and then lump me in with some sot of an idea that you have with regards to women and how they should behave?
We wrinkle our nose disdainfully.
I'm weary entirely with this antiquated ideology of virtue that women should possess when really, all any Don Juan seeks to do anyway (and this in the context of the archetype of Don Juan, which I shall post on tomorrow. It is an ungodly hour, after all, and Miss Anthropic even while kicking the butt of socialized moray does admittedly need her beauty sleep) is ruin it.
The challenge stands simply because Miss Anthropic wears a steel reinforced corset and wields a rapier wit.
And is still not making plans to display those ripe plums just yet, which surely will wither if she does not commence to the wooing of her sheets, despite your evident albeit ineffectual charms.
(Yawn.
Queen to Bednow, rogue;
Check.)
.
Speaking in the third person is generally somewhat less than endearing, but delivering it with a pronounced mumble due to having one's tongue planted firmly in cheek does tend to lessen the gaffe.
Unfortunately for those of us who aspire to at least average mental health, a lot of the delicate little flowers (the guys I mean) that post on this board are so terrified of women that they almost pee their baggy trousers when a chick posts. They have to resort to their usual method of trying to disparage women and cast aspersions on the feminine psyche in order to make their sorry little arses feel less pathetic.
Meanwhile, let the games continue
Unfortunately for those of us who aspire to at least average mental health, a lot of the delicate little flowers (the guys I mean) that post on this board are so terrified of women that they almost pee their baggy trousers when a chick posts. They have to resort to their usual method of trying to disparage women and cast aspersions on the feminine psyche in order to make their sorry little arses feel less pathetic.
Meanwhile, let the games continue
Miss Anthropics cutting responses shall be in bold.
DonRonny misspelled 'eloquently' and then stumbled:
That may be the case, but your anal fixation on grammar only further compounds the masculine image you conjure in my mind.
But she notes dryly: You decry 'mindless stereotypes' in your Helpful Post and then lump me in with some sot of an idea that you have with regards to women and how they should behave?
Now who is stumbling with the grammar?
Anyways, there is a difference between a mindless stereotype and a mindful one. I am basing my assessment upon my perceptions of your individual projection, which is decidedly masculine in its analytical nature. Men do tend to be more analytical, but perhaps you are the exception to the rule. Who really knows?
Nudie pics would save you a lot of this troublesome typing.
We wrinkle our nose disdainfully.
Uh-oh..I have disdained the schizophrenic!
The women of my sort are not exactly the whimpering comehither fodder on which you have endeavoured to refine your seductive manuevers.
My, we are just loaded with assumptions aren´t we?
I'm weary entirely with this antiquated ideology of virtue that women should possess when really, all any Don Juan seeks to do anyway is ruin it.
We actually agree 100% here.
But for the record, I only project virtues onto women that I happen to possess myself. To wit, there is no way I would personally agree to an online game of Strip Chess...but to each his/her own...
The challenge stands simply because Miss Anthropic wears a steel reinforced corset and wields a rapier wit.
Aww shucks! And me without my blowtorch OR bulletproof vest.
And is still not making plans to display those ripe plums just yet, which surely will wither if she does not commence to the wooing of her sheets, despite your evident albeit ineffectual charms.
Well, for your sake I should hope that my charms would not be effective so quickly. You wouldn´t want to be portrayed as "come-hither fodder" now would ya?
Queen to Bednow, rogue;
Check.)
.
Sleep well my dear. That throbbing, man-sized intellect of yours will need the rest no doubt.
DonRonny misspelled 'eloquently' and then stumbled:
That may be the case, but your anal fixation on grammar only further compounds the masculine image you conjure in my mind.
But she notes dryly: You decry 'mindless stereotypes' in your Helpful Post and then lump me in with some sot of an idea that you have with regards to women and how they should behave?
Now who is stumbling with the grammar?
Anyways, there is a difference between a mindless stereotype and a mindful one. I am basing my assessment upon my perceptions of your individual projection, which is decidedly masculine in its analytical nature. Men do tend to be more analytical, but perhaps you are the exception to the rule. Who really knows?
Nudie pics would save you a lot of this troublesome typing.
We wrinkle our nose disdainfully.
Uh-oh..I have disdained the schizophrenic!
The women of my sort are not exactly the whimpering comehither fodder on which you have endeavoured to refine your seductive manuevers.
My, we are just loaded with assumptions aren´t we?
I'm weary entirely with this antiquated ideology of virtue that women should possess when really, all any Don Juan seeks to do anyway is ruin it.
We actually agree 100% here.
But for the record, I only project virtues onto women that I happen to possess myself. To wit, there is no way I would personally agree to an online game of Strip Chess...but to each his/her own...
The challenge stands simply because Miss Anthropic wears a steel reinforced corset and wields a rapier wit.
Aww shucks! And me without my blowtorch OR bulletproof vest.
And is still not making plans to display those ripe plums just yet, which surely will wither if she does not commence to the wooing of her sheets, despite your evident albeit ineffectual charms.
Well, for your sake I should hope that my charms would not be effective so quickly. You wouldn´t want to be portrayed as "come-hither fodder" now would ya?
Queen to Bednow, rogue;
Check.)
.
Sleep well my dear. That throbbing, man-sized intellect of yours will need the rest no doubt.
Why thank you, my dear.
Despite my academic upbringing, I do not consider myself to be one, though I am sure such still reflects in my patterns of expression.It is not so much that I am opposed to intellectualism, as I am of the view that it is quite simply not a very satisfactory way to approach life. As a certain Buddhist scripture skilfully says: Painted rice cakes do not satisfy hunger.
As for my post, I merely found it curious that in the first part of the post, you described the value of female intuition, only to describe how women are generally lead around by their emotions in all sorts of ways. I do in fact consider myself to be an intuitive person, and as I have come to understand it, it is neither an intellectual (speculative) nor emotional matter. I find that intuition rarely mixes well with these. It is a product of observation and awareness, imo. In fact, I find that emotionalism and intellectualism go very well in hand. Highly emotional people are often prone to speculation on all sorts of topics to justify their own emotional reactions ("female intuition" is an often used justification for not having a clue, but still wanting to have a say), whereas intellectual people often are very out of touch with their own emotions, which tends to make them all the more emotional (/reactionary), only in a more supressed fashion.
Now, you also write:
Which I do tend to agree with. Perhaps you read my initial comment as more condemning than humourous. Personally, I prefer to trivialise female emotions, by humouring to a certain extent. Women are bound to have them, which I find a charming little game to observe, though not to play.
This doesn't really have anything to do with the prefix female. I trivialise male emotions as well, although usually just by not responding at all to it. As for my own emotions, I prefer silent awareness of them, which I find very conducive to intuitive understanding of them.
rgds
B9