Falcon said:
Indeed it is, I don’t understand either.
the problem and the solution are the same, it wont get better until it gets worse.
I have already stated marriage benefits women more then men, this is a biased agenda, but is about due to many reasons, one is fundamentally profit and the lesbian agenda to 'empower' women and 'de-throne men'.
Remember in the past men used to go out to work and bring in the money, the economy was rather stable, then war came and women wanted more and more to have what men have i.e work, but still be provided for, then a generation later, it hit 'hard' young girls where 'liberated' 'free love' e.t.c now these same girls are accumulating 'cats' and not men, because what they found was the 'elite' profit makers in society saw an opportunity to get more workers in the work force, hence create 'Competition' for jobs, hence lower wages, increase costs for 'housing' 'cars' and commodities. What women where left with was they had to join men in the thick of it, going to work, 9to5 and they found they could not have the 'best of both worlds' since men could no longer afford to 'provide' for a family, since there was too much Competition around now. (also dont forget women marry UP, normally).
Also most adverts e.t.c are generated for women, elite groups know women are responsible for over 85% of spending, if its there husbands or there's. They cant advertise to men, since men usually see through the BS from these adverts, but show a women an advert for Pender petites and she will go out and buy it, even though this supposed wrinkle cream kept a faced lift 45 year old famous hag from getting wrinkles, but was only brought out a year ago (women are fuc*ing dumb sometimes). Hence society is geared towards women, since there is allot of 'money' to be made from pandering to women, also women are subject to 'emotional' reactions more then 'logic' based, hence the stability of a family unit could be under strain, has an emotional women gets an outburst and has an 'open door' in the form of a get out-clause that benefits her. (more money for marriages, divorces more opportunity, wealth going to the female, child maintenence, father has to work harder, if he gets to see his kids or not, e.t.c)
Men and women in the western sphere, this is a small example of the difference in men and women:
Your 10 years old, you have a kid sister who is 9 years old.
Your father pulls you to one side and tells you:
'Do not ever hit girls, hitting girls is wrong'
Your kid sister is in ear shot of this.
A day passes, your sister comes into your room and play's with your toys, you come in and take them back from her, then she proceeds to whack you in the face as hard has she can.
'Your head snaps and you hit her back'.
She goes running to 'daddy' (i.e big brother state), tells daddy you hit her, Daddy comes and disciplines you, even though you tell him what had happened.
To put further salt in the wound, your dad then picks up your toys and passes them to the little princess to play with and grounds you to your room.
This is an example of 'state' control, women are, has a majority not accountable for there 'actions', daddy is always there to step up to there defence, i.e one only has to look at how women are treated in a court of law, and get 'puss* pass treatment', Men in all regards are accountable for 'there actions', many times have i seen women do rude stuff to men in public places; slapping them, tripping them up, throwing food at them e.t.c, if a man did this he would be jumped on by other 'men' and be locked up, where these women normally get 'cheers', i saw one women beat a guy up for him calling her a ***** in the middle of the high street, all the other women and men stood around where 'cheering her on', imagine if this was a guy hitting a girl?
Another example is sexual harassment, try telling the guard on a train a women flashed at you and see how far you get, but a month ago I watch how a police force would chase a man from 2 train station stops, because a women said he flashed at her.
I could go on, but know this:
We live in a matriarchal sphere, because there is 'alot' of money to be made from the 'gullible' materialistic, emotion fuelled female, feminist where a ka-ching deal to the people who make money and they don’t care about 'you', separation of the 'family' is the next logic step, imagine having kids and your 12year old daughter 'sues' you, that is really the sign of one fuc*ed up world, but will soon be a reality.
If men stayed away from marriage, these so called ‘elites’ will have no choice, to get on the men’s side, since women want ‘marriage’ more then men, when men hold out, in that only have there own wealth to spend, these money moguls will have no choice but to take the ‘man’ angle and drop all this feminist BS altogether, this wont happen whilst men are more then willing to be shafted up the back crack, which, which ever way you look at in, in terms of marriage men get a dumb deal, you cant deny this!
