Give me a break. This whole article was written in a self-serving, egomaniacal context. I don't doubt the validity of what she says, but I condemn the ideals which are the foundation of her entire diatribe. "I want, I want, I want.... I am entitled to this and that" What is she offering, exactly, in return? The chance for us to catch a glimpse at her naked ass? Wow, that certainly makes all the effort worth it! (note sarcasm)
The bottom line is this: we, as men, have better things to do then become a woman's personal and private court jester. Is that what you want... to be a source of amusement to a woman? Because when you boil it down that is what you are condoning. And what will you receive in return? As we've clearly determined, the author of the original text offers absolutely nothing in terms of reciprocation for our endeavors to create a magical wonderland of thrilling delights (as she would have it) solely for her pleasure. I would rather die a bitter, sex-less old bastard than sacrifice my time, money, and most importantly, my dignity, for the ultimate prize (more sarcasm) of a common piece of ass.