Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A tip on dealing with haters
Originally posted by AC/DC
What have I accomplished? Absolutely nothing. If i had Bush' daddies connections and money, I'd be in an Adult Movie starring me and Michael Jackson. Also, getting a master's degree is easy because Bush got it. Is that why I don't have one too? Bush is dumb... but he was somehow smart enough to campaign tirelessly and defend himself and his stances to be elected governor, and President for two consecutive terms. He also paid everyone to vote for him, because there's no way an idiot could have actually garnered over 100 million votes by paying people for it, right?
By the way, I think I'm coming out of the closet!
AHAHAHA... Funny! Well actually it wasn't that funny, but yeah deserves at least a smirking grin from me.
Dude, I'm not gonna make any statements here but (sarcasm); Are you sure you aren't a moron? Cause if you aren't then maybe you can make some other type of argument instead of ad hominem? Cause you know that's what retards do when they can't cut it anymore.
Do i got an MBA? No you're right i don't, not yet at least. But more than likely i will 2 years from now. That is unless i lose interest because it's not like i really need it... or need it to prove any point ;-). But feel free to use the fact that Bush does have an MBA as the only somewhat empowered argument that Bush actually HAS a brain. Even though pretty much every decision he has made and everything he has said and done has shown the exact opposite. The thing that is set in stone here is that Bush has an MBA AND more importantly, it is totally set in stone that he 'earned' that same MBA. Everything else like his moronic speeches, his complete absence of concentration and mind and the complete and utter tardiness of any of his spontaneous statements are all just moot. They mean nothing, add up to nothing because it's set in stone that he has and earned his MBA. This is basically THE strongest aspect of your ad hominem argument... so uhm yah... get the picture?
Derek, i like how you kinda Bash everyone who doesn't agree because they can't back-up their statements with statistic facts. Where are yours though....?
Do you even have facts? Other then rich+mba+president= winner and good person = better than you?! What's your point?
Is your point by any chance... "I'm a complete tard who thinks that wealth, titles and degrees somehow dictate the value of a person and by that logic i know GBJR is actually a great person and a winner". Is it something like that?
Btw there is this saying about the enlightened and the ones in the dark. The enlightened can see those in the dark, vice versa however they cannot. If you can't see that Bush is a huge tard that has gotten where he's gotten because he's a puppet to the REAL smart guys, then I'm inclined to conclude that you must simply not be smarter than Bush since you cannot see his flaws...
Your point is that Bush is somehow a 'winner' because he accomplished a few things that are at first glance very challenging.
There was this guy once. He was basically a homeless guy scraping for food by selling mostly uninteresting paintings. One person took pity on him and give him a chance to show some of his painting although it was obvious he had no real talent but very good technique and all the 'theory' of painting down to a T. When his paintings didn't sell he drove up a new alley, started as a spokesman for his political party and quickly became popular with the masses. Painting took a backseat for politics and he painted only out of interest since then. After a few short years he was elected the highest office in his nation. He was more popular than any other ruler ever in his nation and he held the masses in his hands. Not 5 years later he conquered all of Europe, parts of Africa and parts of Russia. His accomplishments are fantastic to say the least. This guy's name was Adolf Hitler.
BUT he was NOT a retard, because he accomplished some things most of us cannot (or don't want to). Furthermore; He accomplished EVERYTHING by himself, all of it. The warfare success, the technological success (which USA still uses to date), his political success, everything, he did it all by himself. His generals, scientists and party had nothing to do with it. They never did the work for him because he was to crazy or retarded to do so himself... Right Derek?!
You want to know what the really sad truth is about the comparison AH and GBJR? I have more respect for AH because at least he had some balls. Other than that they are both completely despicable, retarded and basically losers...
So you put losers on pedestals because you can't recognize the fact that they are losers? Why do you think you do this? Dare i say it? And if i say it will you then argue by making a list of your own accomplishments? Which will undoubtedly be impressive and somewhat questionable in truth...