PoachR75
Senior Don Juan
As everyone must know by now, I am a fanatic when it comes to advocating a minimum 5 day wait to call after first acquiring the number. This policy has been debated back and forth for some time now. I am now going to explain it so damn well that there can be no argument from now on.
1. You wait at least 5 days to call in order to prolong the suspense and subtly suggest that you are fairly busy person.
2. The basic DJ logic behind this comes from the very well-documented DJ principle that you must always be strong enough to risk "losing" the girl or strong enough to walk away at any time. If you aren't, the females will absolutely SMELL it!
3. Waiting this long to call is a very advisable first step in this vein. No matter what anyone thinks or says, by waiting you immediately signal your WILLINGNESS TO RISK LOSING THE GIRL'S INTEREST (and no matter how you feel about it, you will never be a true DJ until you honestly DO NOT FEAR losing the interest of one particular girl). Women find the willingness to risk this very attractive.
It has been my experience that women will not mention the wait to you. They may mention it to their friends, in which case, look at it this way: you are DJing girls that you haven't even MET YET! (good job).
The bottom line is that the DJ principles (specifically the willingness to walk away and not being afrain of losing something) should be implemented from the very beginning. One should always be polite and sincere, and play off any inquiry: "I've been really busy with work and I have an important hobby thing coming up. So, what did YOU do today?".
If a girl has an interest, it will remain for 4 days. Would YOU lose interest in a hottie just because she didn't call for awhile? That is, if she DIDN'T SPECIFICALLY SAY THAT SHE WOULD AT A CERTAIN TIME?
Juxtapose the situation. Of course you wouldn't lose interest. A hottie is a hottie. To her, a DJ is a DJ (i.e. desirable) and she will be glad to hear from your when you call.
-In the EXTREMELY REMOTE instance that a female would say "Hey. I haven't heard from you in 5 days. I do not want to date you now. Goodbye", then you get to practice your very necessary DJ skill of accepting the loss and not letting it bother you in the least. You'll see her out again anyway, and she'll describe you as "too busy to date her" to her girlfriends (i.e. desirable). Where is the down side here? Simple, there isn't one.
Won't matter anyhow. The fact is that, in the vast majority of cases, the wait method will work without a hitch. This is because INTEREST LEVEL dictates female behavior far more than minor timing issues.
Case Closed.
5 day wait to call.
Be sincere but not apologetic with any excuse.
First five dates on WEEKDAYS.
Action dates only.
(This is the way I did it, and is there anyone out there going to tell me I didn't hit it last night?)
------------------
"We've got a blind date with destiny, and it looks like she's ordered the lobster. There's no point in waiting for the cavalry, because, as of this moment, the cavalry is US."
-- The Shoveler, "Mystery Men"
[This message has been edited by PoachR75 (edited 03-08-2002).]
[This message has been edited by PoachR75 (edited 03-08-2002).]
1. You wait at least 5 days to call in order to prolong the suspense and subtly suggest that you are fairly busy person.
2. The basic DJ logic behind this comes from the very well-documented DJ principle that you must always be strong enough to risk "losing" the girl or strong enough to walk away at any time. If you aren't, the females will absolutely SMELL it!
3. Waiting this long to call is a very advisable first step in this vein. No matter what anyone thinks or says, by waiting you immediately signal your WILLINGNESS TO RISK LOSING THE GIRL'S INTEREST (and no matter how you feel about it, you will never be a true DJ until you honestly DO NOT FEAR losing the interest of one particular girl). Women find the willingness to risk this very attractive.
It has been my experience that women will not mention the wait to you. They may mention it to their friends, in which case, look at it this way: you are DJing girls that you haven't even MET YET! (good job).
The bottom line is that the DJ principles (specifically the willingness to walk away and not being afrain of losing something) should be implemented from the very beginning. One should always be polite and sincere, and play off any inquiry: "I've been really busy with work and I have an important hobby thing coming up. So, what did YOU do today?".
If a girl has an interest, it will remain for 4 days. Would YOU lose interest in a hottie just because she didn't call for awhile? That is, if she DIDN'T SPECIFICALLY SAY THAT SHE WOULD AT A CERTAIN TIME?
Juxtapose the situation. Of course you wouldn't lose interest. A hottie is a hottie. To her, a DJ is a DJ (i.e. desirable) and she will be glad to hear from your when you call.
-In the EXTREMELY REMOTE instance that a female would say "Hey. I haven't heard from you in 5 days. I do not want to date you now. Goodbye", then you get to practice your very necessary DJ skill of accepting the loss and not letting it bother you in the least. You'll see her out again anyway, and she'll describe you as "too busy to date her" to her girlfriends (i.e. desirable). Where is the down side here? Simple, there isn't one.
Won't matter anyhow. The fact is that, in the vast majority of cases, the wait method will work without a hitch. This is because INTEREST LEVEL dictates female behavior far more than minor timing issues.
Case Closed.
5 day wait to call.
Be sincere but not apologetic with any excuse.
First five dates on WEEKDAYS.
Action dates only.
(This is the way I did it, and is there anyone out there going to tell me I didn't hit it last night?)
------------------
"We've got a blind date with destiny, and it looks like she's ordered the lobster. There's no point in waiting for the cavalry, because, as of this moment, the cavalry is US."
-- The Shoveler, "Mystery Men"
[This message has been edited by PoachR75 (edited 03-08-2002).]
[This message has been edited by PoachR75 (edited 03-08-2002).]