Redpilled POV is hard

[plumber]

I also found out this to make my action dirty.
But once you get the knowledge, you can't do anything about it.
It's not like "erasing" it from a PC Hard Drive, rather living with it.

one of the laws is to not react. do not show surprise when others try to surprise you or other emotion tactics. this does not harm anyone and really helps to reduce negative interactions.

 

[plumber]

Yeah, it's nice to know tactics that other people might use with you. But I have to admit I can't recall any such occasion in my life. I do know some manipulative people, but I'm pretty skeptical of all their actions anyway.

it depends on the environment. would love to hear more about how you arrange that. do you think others ever feel threatened by you?

 

[BaronOfHair]

. However, you may find that you can no longer enjoy life as fully as you once did.

All the more incentive to start subjecting Red Pill Scripture to the same rigor and skepticism we apply to ALL religious dogma. You'll find it's no more or less flawed than anything else created by humans

 

[Gamisch]

All the more incentive to start subjecting Red Pill Scripture to the same rigor and skepticism we apply to ALL religious dogma. You'll find it's no more or less flawed than anything else created by humans

Just like religion, there are many great aspects about it but unfortunately it also lends itself to grifters trying to milk clueless men financially dry. But on the other hand...if the redpill doesn't do some jezebel will..

A fool and his money will be separated either way..

 

[plumber]

All the more incentive to start subjecting Red Pill Scripture to the same rigor and skepticism we apply to ALL religious dogma. You'll find it's no more or less flawed than anything else created by humans

perhaps you can outline some of the faulty dogma ?

for example: AWALT. Of course this one is silly as we have large differences in all people. This is probably one of the most harsh ideas. But... on the other hand we do know that humans have some behaviors that follow gender division lines. The issue with this one is choosing the categories or behaviors that are true. As part of the same; some say that all men are like that (whatever that is), yet that is considered funny or an ok idea....

one of the subtle things about red pill is the idea of materialism vs duality.

so what are the faulty dogma and why do some consider it as the truth ?

 

[BaronOfHair]

for example: AWALT

Yes, let's start with something easy:

It's true that a man is, on average, more attractive to most heterosexual women if he fits the Don Draper(minus the chain smoking and booze addiction)/Harvey Specter mold. This doesn't mean that she won't get a wild hair up her anus, and decide to cheat on such a man with a Leonardo Dicaprio circa-'97esque twink who lives in a loft with 8 other people, and has pretensions of making a living as an artist. Or decide that she'd like to bat for the other side for awhile, then run off with a sheher who bears a striking resemblance to Kat Moening

 

[plumber]

Yes, let's start with something easy:

It's true that a man is, on average, more attractive to most heterosexual women if he fits the Don Draper(minus the chain smoking and booze addiction)/Harvey Specter mold. This doesn't mean that she won't get a wild hair up her anus, and decide to cheat on such a man with a Leonardo Dicaprio circa-'97esque twink who lives in a loft with 8 other people, and has pretensions of making a living as an artist. Or decide that she'd like to bat for the other side for awhile, then run off with a sheher who bears a striking resemblance to Kat Moening

ok, so is AWALT red pill ? Is it true ? Are the red pill solutions correct ?

 

[BaronOfHair]

ok, so is AWALT red pill ?

I'd say, as many others already have, that all this Red Pill nonsense mimics Wokeness in the following sense: "Language is used not to elucidate but to confuse and has ever-changing meanings, not unlike “newspeak.”

Source

Where Do We Go From Here? – Fifth Principle Project

fifthprincipleproject.org

Answering the question "Is (insert topic)Red Pill" is impossible, for the simple fact that what's RP and what's not has ever-changing meanings


"Is it true ?"

That all women, especially heterosexual women, share certain ways of existing? Yes. What's often omitted though: These aren't hard and fast rules by any means, and there's a great deal of variation, depending upon factors like geography and culture


"Are the red pill solutions correct ?"

98% of TRP is theory, with very little discussion of "What do we do now?"

 

[BaronOfHair]

Just like religion, there are many great aspects about it...

Yep... "Love Thy Neighbor As One Loves Thyself" and "Be careful of the women you invite into your life. They can be just as hazardous as men" are words to abide by, and predate the folks who are often credited with uttering them

Believing that all the evil in the world is the result of an ill-defined Satan who's existence can't be proved, or a vague, amorphous notion like Gynocentrism, is were sh-t goes awry

 

[plumber]

I'd say, as many others already have, that all this Red Pill nonsense mimics Wokeness in the following sense: "Language is used not to elucidate but to confuse and has ever-changing meanings, not unlike “newspeak.”

Source

Where Do We Go From Here? – Fifth Principle Project

fifthprincipleproject.org

Answering the question "Is (insert topic)Red Pill" is impossible, for the simple fact that what's RP and what's not has ever-changing meanings


"Is it true ?"

That all women, especially heterosexual women, share certain ways of existing? Yes. What's often omitted though: These aren't hard and fast rules by any means, and there's a great deal of variation, depending upon factors like geography and culture


"Are the red pill solutions correct ?"

98% of TRP is theory, with very little discussion of "What do we do now?"

ok, looks like saying the same thing as TRP, but distancing from the terminology and being a bit PC (politically correct).

the what do we do now is always the elephant in the room.

 

[BaronOfHair]

so what are the faulty dogma and why do some consider it as the truth ?

Another Red Pill Catechism that's horrendously simplistic: The notion that men alone have to acquire the skills to attract and maintain mates. Yes, the few women who are supermodel material may have an EASIER time attracting mates, but this is only less than 1% of the overall female population. The vast majority of women have to

-Smooth out their rough edges via plastic surgery

Or/and

-Learn to work what what they've got

And EVERYONE(regardless of gender)has to acquire the proficiencies to keep a high-quality SO once they've snagged on. Becoming attractive is, in one sense, the easy part