jhonny9546
Master Don Juan
Hi guys! This is something to discuss with mature men!
There is a common consensus that women are attracted to wild, dominant men. Those they perceive as "slippery conquerors".
Their goal often seems to be to "tame" these men and make them fall in love, thereby securing their commitment.
Infact, relationships tend to thrive only when the man is caught, in love, but not overly invested.
As we member of the sosuave forum, and other men, dedicated to solving our fallacies and pursuing self-improvement, we work to "solve" our impulsiveness, aggressiveness, and other malicious traits so that we become more stable and wise. Interestingly, women may be biologically drawn to men with more "wild" characteristics because it allows them to express their love through the act of "taming" or "controlling" them. Consequently, women may prefer unstable men, as this provides them with a challenge and an opportunity to feel love through their efforts to stabilize him. For instance, a relationship where the man is impulsive, aggressive, childish and forgetful sometimes, while the woman is nurturing, caring and organized, can create a dynamic where she feels needed and can bring "love."
As we work on self-improvement and become more complete and stable individuals, we may inadvertently become less attractive to women. This is because we no longer possess those "broken" traits that women feel compelled to fix. This leads to an intriguing observation: long-lasting relationships often seem to function better when there is an unstable male paired with a woman who seeks to stabilize him. It appears that many women are drawn to men with imperfections, as it allows them to feel a sense of purpose in their relationship.
Ultimately, it seems that some women desire something "broken" that they can fix. For a long-lasting relationship, a man may feel pressured to maintain certain flaws so that his partner can have the "privilege" of adjusting him. This dynamic can create an illusion of control for the woman and contribute to the longevity of the relationship. I hope I am mistaken in this perspective. I would appreciate hearing different viewpoints from those who live this reality but see it differently. Is there truly a version of the "mature man" who is not seen as someone needing fixing? Can a woman genuinely love a complete man without wanting to change or "tame" him?
A broken man that a woman can fix is also the first and most common fantasy in erotic and romance novels.
Is something they crave for, and if they happen to "catch" one and make the father of their child, look like they can be in "love".
There is a common consensus that women are attracted to wild, dominant men. Those they perceive as "slippery conquerors".
Their goal often seems to be to "tame" these men and make them fall in love, thereby securing their commitment.
Infact, relationships tend to thrive only when the man is caught, in love, but not overly invested.
As we member of the sosuave forum, and other men, dedicated to solving our fallacies and pursuing self-improvement, we work to "solve" our impulsiveness, aggressiveness, and other malicious traits so that we become more stable and wise. Interestingly, women may be biologically drawn to men with more "wild" characteristics because it allows them to express their love through the act of "taming" or "controlling" them. Consequently, women may prefer unstable men, as this provides them with a challenge and an opportunity to feel love through their efforts to stabilize him. For instance, a relationship where the man is impulsive, aggressive, childish and forgetful sometimes, while the woman is nurturing, caring and organized, can create a dynamic where she feels needed and can bring "love."
As we work on self-improvement and become more complete and stable individuals, we may inadvertently become less attractive to women. This is because we no longer possess those "broken" traits that women feel compelled to fix. This leads to an intriguing observation: long-lasting relationships often seem to function better when there is an unstable male paired with a woman who seeks to stabilize him. It appears that many women are drawn to men with imperfections, as it allows them to feel a sense of purpose in their relationship.
Ultimately, it seems that some women desire something "broken" that they can fix. For a long-lasting relationship, a man may feel pressured to maintain certain flaws so that his partner can have the "privilege" of adjusting him. This dynamic can create an illusion of control for the woman and contribute to the longevity of the relationship. I hope I am mistaken in this perspective. I would appreciate hearing different viewpoints from those who live this reality but see it differently. Is there truly a version of the "mature man" who is not seen as someone needing fixing? Can a woman genuinely love a complete man without wanting to change or "tame" him?
A broken man that a woman can fix is also the first and most common fantasy in erotic and romance novels.
Is something they crave for, and if they happen to "catch" one and make the father of their child, look like they can be in "love".
