Pharma CEO assasinated!!

[AmsterdamAssassin]

I think the greedy should all wear a crown of molten gold.

 

[Bible_Belt]

He probably should have left out that part about all people being equal in fundamental worth and moral status as set forth by the Constitution. I guess he meant except for the guy he murdered.

Being that mad and only being able to shoot one guy in the back is pretty pathetic. Kids these days don't know what war means.

 

[Gamisch]

I heard he took his mask off to flirt with a woman and that's how they caught him..

Saw the killer’s Photos….He’s too good looking to be a killer ….Lol…but then again, look at Ted Bundy…..


But I smell a psyop…for the sole purpose of distracting the public

Wth does his looks have to do with this??

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

I heard he took his mask off to flirt with a woman and that's how they caught him..

see post #9, #17 & #18. He wanted to get arrested. He wants his day in court with the whole world watching.

 

[Travel memoir21]

I heard he took his mask off to flirt with a woman and that's how they caught him..




Wth does his looks have to do with this??

I don’t want to sound vain….But if you were a Chad like this guy, you’d probably have a bunch of women by your side and a whole bunch of perks with it that throwing it away by killing some dude would be a bad idea…..


But then again, people are just not psychologically right these days….So I could be wrong.

 

[Pandora]

I hope Mangione goes down a hero and we move from mass shootings to taking out greedy CEO's in the back pocket of government and playing insider trading games. Nobody should get paid $10M per year.

We got rid of the Mafia but replaced them with sophisticated crime organizations called American corporations. These corporations have been extorting the people for years, and our government is no different.

Exactly!

 

[The Duke]

I don’t want to sound vain….But if you were a Chad like this guy, you’d probably have a bunch of women by your side and a whole bunch of perks with it that throwing it away by killing some dude would be a bad idea…..


But then again, people are just not psychologically right these days….So I could be wrong.


View attachment 13601

Obviously women weren't what he thought was important. When you have plenty of something it has little value.

 

[BillyPilgrim]

I heard he took his mask off to flirt with a woman and that's how they caught him..




Wth does his looks have to do with this??

Everything. This is a psyop and Mangione wasn't the dude at the McDonalds. It was a different person, as I showed above.

 

[BillyPilgrim]

Peeps be believing the MSM on this even on the eve of fricking 2025. What can I say?

Ok, as a thought exercise, since this event has garnered so much media coverage....ask yourself this:

Why are there only 2 pics of the CEO on the internet?

Only 2 pics of CEO Brian Thompson on Google Image Search, click the link and see for yourselves...

Just a small town girl...

 

[sevbucmash]

Motive?

 

[Chow Mein]

Obviously women weren't what he thought was important. When you have plenty of something it has little value.

This right here.

Simps will always think a man is doing something to get laid. They find it hard to live life with a purpose, outside of bedding women.

Whatever ‘purpose’ a man has, he follows through with what he believes. Whether it is right or wrong, kindness or malicious, but he chose his path.

Most men worry about what women think, especially of then. When you let it go, you learn to appreciate what you can become.

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

Word on the street is that the CEO was in some trouble and they were afraid he'd spill some names so they (government, etc.) wanted to get rid of him. Like one mob boss taking out another mob boss. Dude's a patsy.

 

[Raggendecanton]

He smiled into security cameras.
If you read into him, you'll find that his mother was a victim of this health insurance. This CEO was directly involved in the constantly changing terms and conditions regarding coverage that his ailing mother suffered needlessly to fill the pockets of the board of directors and stockholders.
This is all in his 'manifesto' that he carried on him for when he was arrested. When, not If. He chose to be 'caught'. He wanted to get arrested, so that his court case will be a big media spectacle where he can carry his message to millions of viewers. And maybe people will listen and demand a change and realise that society is better off without this CEO.

To me, this guy is a principled person risking incarceration and/or death to bring injustice to light. He seems to be willing to face the consequences for his actions.

Of course there are plenty of righteous people screaming how this guy is insane/sociopathic to break the law and murder someone. I don't think he cares much about their opinion, he's convinced he did a good deed and the right thing by killing this greedy murderous dirtbag and bringing the horrendous practices of health insurance companies under the attention of the masses. And I agree, people need a wake up call but are so apathetic that shaking isn't working anymore. Slapping them awake by murdering a greedy capitalist pig may just be necessary.

Your argument, while clearly passionate, is deeply flawed and dangerously simplistic. Murder, no matter the justification, cannot and should not be seen as a legitimate means of addressing systemic issues. By condoning or even romanticizing such an act, you undermine the very principles of justice and morality you claim to support. A society where individuals take justice into their own hands based on personal grievances or beliefs is a society that descends into chaos, not progress.

Dehumanizing the victim by calling them a "greedy capitalist pig" doesn’t strengthen your point—it weakens it. Justice cannot be selective or based on emotional vendettas. Every person, regardless of their actions, deserves due process. To strip someone of their humanity to justify their murder is to adopt the very mindset you likely claim to oppose. This is no different from the rationale used by extremists like the Unabomber—someone who similarly believed his acts of violence were necessary to awaken society to a greater truth. We’ve seen where that mindset leads, and it’s nowhere good.

You suggest that such an act will “wake people up,” but this is naive at best and dangerous at worst. The public discourse will focus on the violence, not the message. Violence rarely brings about meaningful change; instead, it alienates potential allies and gives opponents ammunition to dismiss the underlying issues. The spotlight will be on the murder, not the systemic injustices within the healthcare system. And lets be real, there are a lot of injustices in the healthcare system.... That goes for the healthcare system in America, but that also goes for our healthcare system in the Netherlands.

Let’s not forget that glorifying these kinds of acts is a threat to rational discourse and the values of any civil society. By elevating this individual to some misguided status of a martyr, you risk inspiring others to follow a similar path, perpetuating harm and undermining any chance of constructive change. This type of rhetoric doesn’t challenge power—it reinforces the very chaos that allows injustices to persist.

I’m going to be honest: I expected this viewpoint of yours, since you are living in Amsterdam. (As a fellow Dutchie, I know what kind of thinking goes around in Amsterdam.) You strike me as the typical anti-capitalist leftist. True progress isn’t built on personal vendettas or violence masquerading as justice. It’s built on collective effort, rational discourse, and a commitment to principles that transcend individual grievances. To think otherwise is to misunderstand the very nature of meaningful societal change.

 

[BillyPilgrim]

Your argument, while clearly passionate, is deeply flawed and dangerously simplistic. Murder, no matter the justification, cannot and should not be seen as a legitimate means of addressing systemic issues. By condoning or even romanticizing such an act, you undermine the very principles of justice and morality you claim to support. A society where individuals take justice into their own hands based on personal grievances or beliefs is a society that descends into chaos, not progress.

Dehumanizing the victim by calling them a "greedy capitalist pig" doesn’t strengthen your point—it weakens it. Justice cannot be selective or based on emotional vendettas. Every person, regardless of their actions, deserves due process. To strip someone of their humanity to justify their murder is to adopt the very mindset you likely claim to oppose. This is no different from the rationale used by extremists like the Unabomber—someone who similarly believed his acts of violence were necessary to awaken society to a greater truth. We’ve seen where that mindset leads, and it’s nowhere good.

You suggest that such an act will “wake people up,” but this is naive at best and dangerous at worst. The public discourse will focus on the violence, not the message. Violence rarely brings about meaningful change; instead, it alienates potential allies and gives opponents ammunition to dismiss the underlying issues. The spotlight will be on the murder, not the systemic injustices within the healthcare system. And lets be real, there are a lot of injustices in the healthcare system.... That goes for the healthcare system in America, but that also goes for our healthcare system in the Netherlands.

Let’s not forget that glorifying these kinds of acts is a threat to rational discourse and the values of any civil society. By elevating this individual to some misguided status of a martyr, you risk inspiring others to follow a similar path, perpetuating harm and undermining any chance of constructive change. This type of rhetoric doesn’t challenge power—it reinforces the very chaos that allows injustices to persist.

I’m going to be honest: I expected this viewpoint of yours, since you are living in Amsterdam. (As a fellow Dutchie, I know what kind of thinking goes around in Amsterdam.) You strike me as the typical anti-capitalist leftist. True progress isn’t built on personal vendettas or violence masquerading as justice. It’s built on collective effort, rational discourse, and a commitment to principles that transcend individual grievances. To think otherwise is to misunderstand the very nature of meaningful societal change.

Let's recolonize Indonesia!!!!

 

[Travel memoir21]

lmao…..Can you believe that halfway around the world…millions of women are using a dildo vibrator thinking of this guy at night?

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

I’m going to be honest: I expected this viewpoint of yours, since you are living in Amsterdam. (As a fellow Dutchie, I know what kind of thinking goes around in Amsterdam.) You strike me as the typical anti-capitalist leftist. True progress isn’t built on personal vendettas or violence masquerading as justice. It’s built on collective effort, rational discourse, and a commitment to principles that transcend individual grievances. To think otherwise is to misunderstand the very nature of meaningful societal change.

I'm going to be honest too, as always. IDGAF about your opinion of me, so you might just as well keep it to yourself.

 

[Gamisch]

I don’t want to sound vain….But if you were a Chad like this guy, you’d probably have a bunch of women by your side and a whole bunch of perks with it that throwing it away by killing some dude would be a bad idea…..


But then again, people are just not psychologically right these days….So I could be wrong.


View attachment 13601

Are you being serious?? Dude looks completely normal, nothing extraordinary ,just a normal looking dude. Looking like him can either make a man a player, an incel, or a bluepill indoctrinated man all depending upon his attitude around women. Thaught you'd know that by now, and that's an entirely different discussion by the way.

lmao…..Can you believe that halfway around the world…millions of women are using a dildo vibrator thinking of this guy at night?

View attachment 13602

I get what you're saying but you are being weird about this imo. Let me just leave it at that. And secondly: when will you learn to take decent screenshots

 

[Gamisch]

Your argument, while clearly passionate, is deeply flawed and dangerously simplistic. Murder, no matter the justification, cannot and should not be seen as a legitimate means of addressing systemic issues. By condoning or even romanticizing such an act, you undermine the very principles of justice and morality you claim to support. A society where individuals take justice into their own hands based on personal grievances or beliefs is a society that descends into chaos, not progress.

Dehumanizing the victim by calling them a "greedy capitalist pig" doesn’t strengthen your point—it weakens it. Justice cannot be selective or based on emotional vendettas. Every person, regardless of their actions, deserves due process. To strip someone of their humanity to justify their murder is to adopt the very mindset you likely claim to oppose. This is no different from the rationale used by extremists like the Unabomber—someone who similarly believed his acts of violence were necessary to awaken society to a greater truth. We’ve seen where that mindset leads, and it’s nowhere good.

You suggest that such an act will “wake people up,” but this is naive at best and dangerous at worst. The public discourse will focus on the violence, not the message. Violence rarely brings about meaningful change; instead, it alienates potential allies and gives opponents ammunition to dismiss the underlying issues. The spotlight will be on the murder, not the systemic injustices within the healthcare system. And lets be real, there are a lot of injustices in the healthcare system.... That goes for the healthcare system in America, but that also goes for our healthcare system in the Netherlands.

Let’s not forget that glorifying these kinds of acts is a threat to rational discourse and the values of any civil society. By elevating this individual to some misguided status of a martyr, you risk inspiring others to follow a similar path, perpetuating harm and undermining any chance of constructive change. This type of rhetoric doesn’t challenge power—it reinforces the very chaos that allows injustices to persist.

I’m going to be honest: I expected this viewpoint of yours, since you are living in Amsterdam. (As a fellow Dutchie, I know what kind of thinking goes around in Amsterdam.) You strike me as the typical anti-capitalist leftist. True progress isn’t built on personal vendettas or violence masquerading as justice. It’s built on collective effort, rational discourse, and a commitment to principles that transcend individual grievances. To think otherwise is to misunderstand the very nature of meaningful societal change.

I get a lotta kumbaja vibes from this.

Violence has always been a way to force people to change things. I do NOT condone Violence, but I do think if you suppress people, they'll gonna revolt.

Before ever knowing who dude was I was 99% sure it had to do something with being a victim directly or indirectly.

We all are here typing because our predecessors used and survived violence. Its deeply ingrained in our system. That's why he gets so much sympathy : more and more people cam relate to this kinda behaviour. The only way to stop this is by giving people a fair chance to build something.

So basically this murder needed to happen to set an example. Yes that may sound "sick" to a person living in a "peaceful bubble ". You'll see more and more of this. In poor regions like Africa and South America ( where my roots are) this is completely normal tbh. Suppress people long enough and they will act on behalf of themselves or as in this case on behalf of their loved ones.

In my home country the rich will live in compounds, sheltered from the "peasants " who are constantly trying to invade, like a zombie apocalyptic movie. The discrepancy between the haves and the have-nots is getting out of hand and eventually NATURE will find ways to even the score. May sound harsh, but it better be a warning to people who believe they are safe inside their ivory towers ; they are never really safe.

 

[Vanderdonck]

I get a lotta kumbaja vibes from this.

Violence has always been a way to force people to change things. I do NOT condone Violence, but I do think if you suppress people, they'll gonna revolt.

Before ever knowing who dude was I was 99% sure it had to do something with being a victim directly or indirectly.

We all are here typing because our predecessors used and survived violence. Its deeply ingrained in our system. That's why he gets so much sympathy : more and more people cam relate to this kinda behaviour. The only way to stop this is by giving people a fair chance to build something.

So basically this murder needed to happen to set an example. Yes that may sound "sick" to a person living in a "peaceful bubble ". You'll see more and more of this. In poor regions like Africa and South America ( where my roots are) this is completely normal tbh. Suppress people long enough and they will act on behalf of themselves or as in this case on behalf of their loved ones.

In my home country the rich will live in compounds, sheltered from the "peasants " who are constantly trying to invade, like a zombie apocalyptic movie. The discrepancy between the haves and the have-nots is getting out of hand and eventually NATURE will find ways to even the score. May sound harsh, but it better be a warning to people who believe they are safe inside their ivory towers ; they are never really safe.

True. Through history, leaders have known that as long as most people are comfortable, revolution will be forestalled. Unfortunately as more elites drink from the trough they lose sight of the discomfort of the masses. Violent revolutions often come as a surprise to the deposed but not to the plebes. The downside is it is more an expression of anger than a well thought plan, and the cycle usually repeats itself.

 

[Gamisch]

True. Through history, leaders have known that as long as most people are comfortable, revolution will be forestalled. Unfortunately as more elites drink from the trough they lose sight of the discomfort of the masses. Violent revolutions often come as a surprise to the deposed but not to the plebes. The downside is it is more an expression of anger than a well thought plan, and the cycle usually repeats itself.

There are plenty of theories about how humanity can take care of all humans so we can all eat from that cake. Can't remember the phrase, but IIRC I saw a video saying that humans in the far future will reach a zeń like state of enlightenment where they become so aware of who they are that the human ego disappears. It was a state that is only accessible through meditation , and before the first human managed to get here people who did reached this state would instantly die due to the power of this enlightened ,powerful state of being. Basically it said that humans will evolve and that we will be seen as how we view Neanderthals today: an acient form of humanity.


untill then: