Funny because the media does not highlight 34C women in the same respect as tall men. In contrast, petite women seem to be more in favor these days but I would expect our biology to prefer a woman with a curve bottom and prominent chest.
I don’t see this. Petite women were in in the 90s (Jennifer Anniston, buffy the vampire slayer). Now it seems it’s all about having an enormous ass and BBLs.
words cannot explain how revolting I find “thicc” chicks.
On the general subject, I a fraction below 6’3.Am wide like a tank (but currently overweight too!). I’ve always liked petite women best, excluding actual midgets, petite is better. Current wife is exactly 5 foot.
I don’t know if it’s opposites attract but I find smaller women very feminine and it kind of amplifies my masculinity to see the difference.
It’s pretty cool that I can military press my wife. I’m more than double her weight.
There are some disadvantages to being big. For a start, my little man is the world average. It’s nothing to write home about. On my frame it looks small.
In bed, make one wrong move and your partner is screaming in pain as you accidentally Pinned her leg with 250lb of your knee.
Also if you’re a chill chap like me, little guys see a big guy with a good nature and they think easy pickings. Win win. If he wins he’s supposed to but a good chance to prove a point.
Overall though it’s mainly a good thing.
However, my friend who’s 5’8 was always the chick magnet in our group, not me. He has kind of Italian looks. This was always WAY more powerful than my slightly ginger agricultural anglo Saxon look
There is a certain look, in the same way the blonde chick is an archetype - you look at any movie, any famous rich woman, they always go for the same guy. White; black hair, slightly Mediterranean looking. Always. This look is orders of magnitude more powerful than a blue eyed fair coloured giant.