anonymous12345
Senior Don Juan
For me condoms are almost depressing, they take away so much fun. Therefore I’m interested in having a policy that in the cases it is possible, allows without.
From my understanding the risk of pregnancy if you don’t *** in her is so low it’s ignorable, so this aspect doesn’t worry me. Correct me if I’m wrong. Can anecdotally confirm myself.
However, STDs from girls that are out and about are a real concern.
No matter what, raw dogging involves risk, but one might be able to reduce it to bearable levels. One way is a talk: “Girl, it’s no worries and totally fine if you’ve had unprotected sex, I just need to know so you don’t risk my and your sisters’ health.” Her answer might be a lie.
In all I believe in social tentacles here and follow assessment and subsequent “trust level.”
Good approach?
From my understanding the risk of pregnancy if you don’t *** in her is so low it’s ignorable, so this aspect doesn’t worry me. Correct me if I’m wrong. Can anecdotally confirm myself.
However, STDs from girls that are out and about are a real concern.
No matter what, raw dogging involves risk, but one might be able to reduce it to bearable levels. One way is a talk: “Girl, it’s no worries and totally fine if you’ve had unprotected sex, I just need to know so you don’t risk my and your sisters’ health.” Her answer might be a lie.
In all I believe in social tentacles here and follow assessment and subsequent “trust level.”
- If it’s a virgin, raw dog is ok.
- If it’s an experienced girl, have a higher threshold for the trust level to pass.
Good approach?