Well, not that low.I must be developmentally challenged then. Thanks for that insight.
Well, not that low.I must be developmentally challenged then. Thanks for that insight.
Online IQ tests are meaningless. I would say IQ tests in general as a measure of G (general intelligence) are still pretty bad. Not to say IQ isn't valid, but the tests are.After reading this thread, I took one of those online IQ tests. Got a 132. I don't know what that says about my relationships w/ women, but I have zero tolerance for a girl and her bvll****.
Y'all are missing the point of my post. I couldn't care less what score I got. I was making a point about my rels with women, since y'all keep talking bout how certain IQ dudes fare with women.Online IQ tests are meaningless. I would say IQ tests in general as a measure of G (general intelligence) are still pretty bad. Not to say IQ isn't valid, but the tests are.
yeah , people with high intelligence usually are more interested exploring theoretical and empirical things , rather than going through bullsh1t with women or people in generalHigh IQ correlates well with book smarts. Game is a street smart sport. Same as basketball. You'll notice there are many flat out dumb ass dudes in the league that make dumb ass financial decisions. But the announcers will say he's got a "high basketball IQ".
Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
yeah thats why judging off IQ alone is stupid. I know plenty of book smart people that cannot make a single coherent thought independently.IQ tests are defined around problem solving capabilities in as little time as possible. It has nothing to do with emotional intelligence or ability to influence or relate to other people.
I know one guy who is dumb as a rock, but he's an absolute master at manipulating women and scamming them. I'm pretty certain he's a psychopath.
As far as I know, there is almost no correlation between IQ and things like "emotional intelligence", social skills, conscientiousness, etc. People here seem to be making a lot of assumptions.IQ tests are defined around problem solving capabilities in as little time as possible. It has nothing to do with emotional intelligence or ability to influence or relate to other people.
I know one guy who is dumb as a rock, but he's an absolute master at manipulating women and scamming them. I'm pretty certain he's a psychopath.
But average intelligence isn't what makes the World function. If you want to be successful and earn big money it's intelligence.High and low intelligence men often struggle with women. Average intelligence is best.
You essentially upped your VALUE in her eyes by showing her that, if she wants you, she has to at times do things that you like to do. You are SOMETHING after all. You are NOT FREE. If she wants to hang with you, it's going to cost her something — time, effort, money.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
not even thatBut average intelligence isn't what makes the World function. If you want to be successful and earn big money it's intelligence.
Jeff Bezos, Thomas Edison, Bill Gates, Paul Allen, Tim Cook, Donald Trump, Warren Buffet I would say are all above average.not even that
most of the senior managers or business owners are not really that smart
Sure , there are some that are , but the vast majority are not
More or less average in intelligence
steve ballmer was an idiot . He was luckyJeff Bezos, Thomas Edison, Bill Gates, Paul Allen, Tim Cook, Donald Trump, Warren Buffet I would say are all above average.
Trump for example might not be an expert at math, but he's a very sharp thinker, great memory too.
Steve Balmer is another. Led Microsoft as CEO for 14 years.
Can't argue about business owners. Yes, there are a lot of dumb ones. Why do you think so many businesses don't last more than a couple years before going belly up.
But some idiot just can't lead a company like Microsoft or Amazon or a tech company.
Many cases senior managers and executives in these companies are not dumb people. They're greedy. Eddie Lampert is a great example. He's intelligent but ran Sears into the ground, basically for personal gains.
Some rich people don't want flashy items and blow their cash.steve ballmer was an idiot . He was lucky
His tenure and legacy as Microsoft CEO has received mixed reception, with the company tripling sales and doubling profits, but losing its market dominance and missing out on 21st-century technology trends
bill gates stole windows from Steve Jobs
warren buffet came from a powerful family and basically he was trusted by his rich father friends and family to invest their money . As a wealth manager he is very far away in performance when compared to other ones
Thomas Edison stole the electricity transportation idea from Nikola Tesla . Tesla wanted to transport electricity for free , while Edison wanted to make money
if you want , I can continue
in our time , the only business man that is indeed smart is musk
but most truly smart and big inventors when died were not rich and all mostly loved a normal life . And even Elon musk , despite being a billionaire he is living a normal life
www.instagram.com
with the raise of the app deliveries , bigSome rich people don't want flashy items and blow their cash.
Magic Johnson, and Shaq are other examples of intelligent business people. Not geeky math experts but smart.
Actually probably Bezos is the smartest. Figured out how to use the internet to basically dominate society as a whole. He's basically taken over retail.
With all the wealth Amazon has built up they basically have no competition. It's just not possible. It would cost way too much money to compete with Amazon. If it were so easy you'd see someone trying to compete with Amazon and you dont.
That's simply not true. IQ is a great measure of general intelligence (G). No one with a high IQ can good at everything now, that's why polymaths don't exist anymore. Richard Feynman, for instance, was terrible at writing and English. How it works is that the most intelligent people often specialize in one area, but the sheer brainpower required to excel in in any one area still demands high G.IQ is a very narrow measurement of intelligence. Amongst many other things, it doesn't measure for EQ, creativity, machiavellianism and psychopathy (psychos are more objective in their decision making because they are unaffected by emotion or morality).
These are all intelligence traits that predict success with women (Dark Triad) - machiavelli (manipulation abilities), narcissism (self love), and psychopathy (no empathy/no emotions = no simping).
Guys who can build computers can't apply computer-building knowledge to picking-up women. Women aren't machines. So the IQ-smart STEM dudes are in a different intelligence stream. It's like a bee that's adept at hunting the best flower, versus the shark that's adept at hunting the best seal. Different skillsets.
Agreed.I believe that several of the forum members are confusing those that are smart with those that are intelligent. These can be two entirely different things.
Memorizing formulas, patterns, or homework etc., can make someone appear smart, but that does not necessarily mean that they are intelligent.
Intelligent people are typicality capable more so of formulating their own ideas and thoughts - without always requiring the aid of outside variables.
As far as intelligence and picking up women? The more alcohol I drink and or the more pot that I smoke, the less I intellectual I appear; consequently more than doubling opportunities to take women home.
I’ll sleep with these types of women, but they’re sure not the type that would prompt me to think forming a relationship.
Telsa died at age 86. Why would his death have been foul play?What IQ Tests aspire to be versus what they are in reality are very similar to places like universities and colleges that rewards pre-defined, narrow forms of intelligence - typically rote learning. Robotic learning. No divergent thinking. No new thought forms allowed.
The issue we have is that we have a society that purposefully rewards and advances non-threatening forms of intelligence, that don't threaten the hierarchy. Guys like Tesla found this out the hard way. If you want to be rewarded and advance in this matrix you have to be intelligent in a way that doesn't upset the power balance apple cart. Otherwise the threatened Alphas that run this matrix will kill you.
Peterson is a perfect example. If he was a real intelligent threat to the system he'd be killed. Peterson is allowed to stay because he operates within the matrix rules, same as the IQ test.
Create self-fulfilling prophecies. Always assume the positive. Assume she likes you. Assume she wants to talk to you. Assume she wants to go out with you. When you think positive, positive things happen.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.