The "lover/provider" dichotomy is more of a behavioral set, not a socioeconomic station.
The "lover" is the physically attractive and/or dominant, confident, "alpha" male that sexually attracts women.
The "provider" is the compliant, subordinate man who emotionally attracts women by appealing to her nesting urges.
"Lovers" can be wealthier, financially, than "providers." What makes a provider a provider is his willingness to, you guessed it, provide his resources. Not necessarily having more resources.
No, you should not hide your wealth if you have it. Wealth indicates status, and status is sexually attractive to women.
The "lover" is the physically attractive and/or dominant, confident, "alpha" male that sexually attracts women.
The "provider" is the compliant, subordinate man who emotionally attracts women by appealing to her nesting urges.
"Lovers" can be wealthier, financially, than "providers." What makes a provider a provider is his willingness to, you guessed it, provide his resources. Not necessarily having more resources.
No, you should not hide your wealth if you have it. Wealth indicates status, and status is sexually attractive to women.