Why Does Moving in Together DESTROY Relationships

[forcerecon01]

Mystery has nothing to do with it. This is another red pill myth.

Two stable people who are going on the same direction, have the same values, the same views on money, religion, kids, the in-laws....
do not care about "mystery".

Men simply do not screen enough beyond the physical. That's why your "live in girlfriend" situation will fall to pieces.

Why would you want to move in with a woman anyway if it's not for marriage. I'll tell you why...men will think "great, puzzy on tap whenever I want it". Does not consider compatibility. Does not consider common values. Does not consider his own or the woman's character.

Fools rush in. Simple as that.

I agree. Men are too visual.

 

[Jake_Gyllenhaal69]

We were together about 6 months before moving in. No fights. Just lots of sex and exploring trips and such

thats a really short time tbh.

 

[SargeMaximus]

thats a really short time tbh.

Woop de do. What's your point?

 

[Jake_Gyllenhaal69]

Woop de do. What's your point?

TBH it was really easy to call BS on your post. To tell me that you never fought with your gf means that you never left the honey moon phase or y’all were literal teenagers. TBH, romanticizing Disney relationships are a feminine trait

 

[SargeMaximus]

TBH it was really easy to call BS on your post. To tell me that you never fought with your gf means that you never left the honey moon phase or y’all were literal teenagers. TBH, romanticizing Disney relationships are a feminine trait

I’m not romanticizing anything, just stating facts of my previous relationship and what I learned. I’ll never be married nor will I go monogamous ever again. If I do go monogamous I’ll still cheat

 

[EyeBRollin]

I’m not romanticizing anything, just stating facts of my previous relationship and what I learned. I’ll never be married nor will I go monogamous ever again. If I do go monogamous I’ll still cheat

That’s feminine mindset to take things to the extreme.

 

[SargeMaximus]

That’s feminine mindset to take things to the extreme.

Isn't that statement extreme? Wtf bro. Let me do my nails

 

[EyeBRollin]

Isn't that statement extreme? Wtf bro. Let me do my nails

No, it is not extreme. Swearing off relationships completely due to a bad experience is what women do. It is not a rational approach.

 

[SargeMaximus]

No, it is not extreme. Swearing off relationships completely due to a bad experience is what women do. It is not a rational approach.

I’m not swearing off relationships because of a bad experience. I learned something about myself and how I’m not monogamous. Therefore I’ll never do monogamous or marriage. I’m all for poly relationships

 

[EyeBRollin]

I’m not swearing off relationships because of a bad experience. I learned something about myself and how I’m not monogamous. Therefore I’ll never do monogamous or marriage. I’m all for poly relationships

Then I stand corrected.

Poly is a tough sell to the court systems of the West. Good luck, brother.

 

[SargeMaximus]

Then I stand corrected.

Poly is a tough sell to the court systems of the West. Good luck, brother.

Good luck with what? I’m not making it my life’s mission to be poly.

 

[Guy69JackBlue]

Then I stand corrected.

Poly is a tough sell to the court systems of the West. Good luck, brother.

Just have multiple "roommates"

 

[RickTheToad]

Sorry but this is flat wrong with data that is conclusive. Cohabitation before marriage has a higher rate of divorce. I don’t know why so many men argue this point when the facts clearly state the contrary.

And why is that?

 

[EyeBRollin]

And why is that?

The why is not important. The data is what it is. Living together before marriage = higher likelihood of divorce.

 

[RickTheToad]

The why is not important. The data is what it is. Living together before marriage = higher likelihood of divorce.

Yea, it is. Otherwise, it's based off of female logic. I'd love to know how and where you get your ideas when there's no scientific basis backing it up.

 

[EyeBRollin]

Yea, it is. Otherwise, it's based off of female logic. I'd love to know how and where you get your ideas when there's no scientific basis backing it up.

Cohabitation divorce statistics are what they are. “Female logic” has nothing to do with it. You are free to dislike the data, but it doesn’t change the numbers.

 

[RickTheToad]

Cohabitation divorce statistics are what they are. “Female logic” has nothing to do with it. You are free to dislike the data, but it doesn’t change the numbers.

Many of your posts seem to be based on "female logic".

 

[Mister_Skinny_Jeanz]

because guys that usually move in with women tend to be needy , not as attractive , or socially inept.
men who are in demand or have a very high smv dont move in because they live life like women , getting hit on and finding sex and relationships easily, who would want to give away all that power? on the flipside some high value men do get girlfriends and move in and have successful relationships , but its usually cause the woman feels lucky and feels like she has a catch , which keeps her in check and on best behavior.
women will sleep with lower value men but will not commit or be faithful or sexually monogamous with lower value men, or men who arent their ''first choice''
the hard part is knowing for sure that you are her ''first choice'' and then remaining that