It's not a double standard at all.
It's easy for women to get laid. It's so easy, in fact, that it's disgusting (both men and women find promiscuous women disgusting).
It's not easy for men to get laid. It's so difficult, in fact, that men who regularly get laid are revered as Chads.
It's not a double standard when women require their men to be pre-selected. Men, on the other hand, do not find pre-selected women with battered meat curtains and thousand c0ck stare attractive. Quite the opposite.
You're falling for the gender dysphoric "men and women are the same, and should be held to the same standards" fallacy. You're comparing squirrels with tigers.
It is a double standard as you frame it.
Particularly when you are talking about very desirable people who have lots of options. Chads and HB9’s let’s say. Chads have tons of women after them. HB9s have tons of men after her. Both end up being selective and both can afford to discriminate
HB9s know they are desirable. Chads know they are desirable. Neither is going to entertain substandard sexual options. They are going to select only from those they choose because they CAN. The other 95% of people who would jump at the chance to bang them DO NOT exist. Those myriads are invisible. So the idea that beautiful women or Chads can always get laid easily is false. Not with people who meet their standard, because people who meet their standard (at or above their SMV) are rare to start with as compared to the general public.
Because people this attractive (of either gender) are so desirable other people at the same SMV gravitate to one another.
So a HB9 might have 2 Chads interested in her...never mind all the other thirsty men. They are screened out already.
A Chad might have 2 HB9s interested in him...(never mind all the 7s and 8s etc.).
So both people preselect because both have the value within the marketplace to do so.
And both are on equal footing and entitled to evaluate their preselected options who meet their criteria.
This doesn’t make the HB9 promiscuous.
Screwing any man who gives her attention without meeting a standard would be promiscuous. That’s not what I’m talking about.
Really desirable people have qualified options presenting themselves all the time.
A woman exploring her options is not automatically promiscuous. This is your shame & judgement revealing itself.
My playboy friend really is a bit of a s l u t honestly. He has days with a fair bit of frequency where he wakes up with one woman, bangs her, has a nooner afternoon session with another woman (he offices at home), and has another woman over later in the evening. So he has days where he gets laid by 3 different women in a 12 hour period.
He’s a rather extreme example, granted, but he has that level of abundance. He could care less if the girls bang other men. He prefers they do frankly. Keeps them from fixating on him and lessens his burden of responsibility if they get too attached & get hurt.
And he is utterly transparent with ALL of them. He will tell a girl she’s got to go because another girl is coming over and he shows his calendar to any woman he gets involved with. If they don’t like it they are free to go. It’s totally honest & open. They can stay or go.
