180lbs? How tall are you? That seems a lot for your bone structure. Btw you should get a newer phone liek note 10 Plus, the new S20 Ultra or iPhone 11 Pro Max. The Moto phone you're using does not take crystal clear pics.
Not everyone is 122lbs at 5'9 like you, bro (not even girls). 5'8-5'11 at 180 is pretty normal depending on density, muscle mass, etc.
This was taking a few months back, im 5"11
Very handsome Andy
I wasn't bashing him. He's in shape and weight isn't an issues but was just interested how he's 180 because as a person he doesn't look huge.
You're on the taller side so 180 isn't bad. All about the muscle. When I was 153lbs when I was younger I looked chunky because nearly all my weight goes into my chest, thighs and face and I had fairly skinny arms and legs even then.
I started training a few years before I joined the fire service, 4 times per week and eating 4000 calories a day I was thin back then 3 years later here I am it's all about gradual build up takes time.
Are firefighters all in shape in your area like you're? IT's funny around here most of the firefighters are older guys, and they have big guts on them and don't look fit like you do. I wonder how do they pass the physical test? Do you have to do cardio? These guys around here would fall over. We have a few women firefighters and they're in better shape than these men are.
No you find once guys have been in the service for a while let themselves go, the initial physical test when u apply for the service is quite difficult a bleep test then carry equipment test, ladder test etc all in the same day
Bro I get this but for the standard American hoe, it’s just not worth it, particularly if things didn’t go so well. If she seems really into you, then fine it’s whatever. But a lot of the times it’s hit or miss, especially with our generation. It’s not about ‘ekwaaalityyy’, it’s about ‘gurl powr!’ lol. Most men are such cucks that they’ll actually pay for a date when they knowdeep down inside they got no chance. Plus, let’s be honest here, the more a chick does for you, the more she will love you. Why? Because it means she’s more invested. If paying for your meetups is Rule #1 in business, then havibg her actually be somewhat invested in you is the class you take before you learn about the ‘rules’. It’s the same reason why so many crappy marriages last for years, couples don’t want to just ‘throw it all away’.
So you mean I should continue to go on dates with cougars?
Only if your fvcking them. Women want to fvck. If they're not fvcking you, it's because they don't want to fvck you. Listen to them.
If they’re actually hot. If they’re not, lol wyd
People say it's impossible for a 50 year old to be hot. Remember that one I like? But she only likes older guys though and didn't mind being friends. Remember she invited me to go to Tampa with her and her friend and I only briefly met her once.
She only has to attractive (enough) to you.
I totally get what you're saying and agree with a lot of it. A lot of women are not worth the $. I do screen out the feminists, princesses, sluts, and women who feel they're owed a dinner. Nothing is 100% but I'm pretty good at focusing on women that have potential. Not all get second dates because I'm big on chemistry and my standards are very high. I'm selective on who I date, so the women I take out appreciate it. Most guys can't or won't screen and are so over-eager, yes, they drop big $ on sluts and losers. Not me. I only date high-interest, quality women.
I think a lot depends on the circumstances. A lot of guys here are just picking up girls for sex only, so yeah they might not want to take them to dinner or to pay the bill. Those are the guys who are saying don't waste your money on these hos and whatnot.
I can assure you it's not to "feel assured of my masculinity". There is no reason under the sun why I would need that assurance.
Of course, no one would ever admit they do anything to feel assured of their masculinity. But here is what you just said with my bolding for emphasis:
What else is that but assuring your masculinity through paying for the woman? Just admit it, Uncle Atom. It's no problem.
So it's OK to "not display leadership" and "be as weak as weak can possibly be" by spending insignificant amounts of money on a woman when you are making a first impression on her, but not later on, when you must switch over to spending more on her? And how does that mesh with you saying you should "display leadership and dominance" - masculinity - "right off the bat" by "paying for her", in the quote above?
