zekko
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 16,065
- Reaction score
- 8,908
I've been hearing the expression "Nice guys finish last" my entire life. I'm sure it originates from before I was born. It certainly wasn't invented by the manosphere. I noticed there are two general schools of thought on nice guys in the manosphere:
1a) This is the "Nice Guy" as defined by PUAs. This is someone who feels entitled to a woman having sex with him just because he is nice. He is actually manipulative, because he expects that if he behaves nicely toward a woman, she will reward him by having sex with him. Which often does not work, of course. In this case, his being nice is not sincere or genuine at all, he has ulterior motives. In reality, this "Nice Guy" is actually a manipulative jerk.
2a) The second school of thought is backed up by research. It shows that people with a high degree of the trait "agreeableness" tend to be less successful. Basically, these people are too passive, they tend to be followers, they are satisfied with being a cog in the machine. They tend to be easily manipulated by others or bent to their will. They aren't proactive, they don't seek to enforce their own will, or achieve their own goals. They're going along with the crowd, or serving the leader.
OR if you look at if from a different angle:
1b) Same as the above 1a, the "Nice Guy" isn't a real nice guy, he's a manipulative jerk, he's incongruent, and that's why women don't respond to him.
2b) These guys simply believe that women genuinely do not like acts of kindness, they do not like good men, they want thugs, bullies, @ssholes, criminals, they like to write to guys on death row. They believe that treating a women well or with respect is the kiss of death, and that they will only be attracted to men who mistreat them, cheat on them, or care nothing for them.
Of all the above, I believe 2a is closest to the truth. But the problem with these guys is not that they are kind, it's that they are passive.
1a) This is the "Nice Guy" as defined by PUAs. This is someone who feels entitled to a woman having sex with him just because he is nice. He is actually manipulative, because he expects that if he behaves nicely toward a woman, she will reward him by having sex with him. Which often does not work, of course. In this case, his being nice is not sincere or genuine at all, he has ulterior motives. In reality, this "Nice Guy" is actually a manipulative jerk.
2a) The second school of thought is backed up by research. It shows that people with a high degree of the trait "agreeableness" tend to be less successful. Basically, these people are too passive, they tend to be followers, they are satisfied with being a cog in the machine. They tend to be easily manipulated by others or bent to their will. They aren't proactive, they don't seek to enforce their own will, or achieve their own goals. They're going along with the crowd, or serving the leader.
OR if you look at if from a different angle:
1b) Same as the above 1a, the "Nice Guy" isn't a real nice guy, he's a manipulative jerk, he's incongruent, and that's why women don't respond to him.
2b) These guys simply believe that women genuinely do not like acts of kindness, they do not like good men, they want thugs, bullies, @ssholes, criminals, they like to write to guys on death row. They believe that treating a women well or with respect is the kiss of death, and that they will only be attracted to men who mistreat them, cheat on them, or care nothing for them.
Of all the above, I believe 2a is closest to the truth. But the problem with these guys is not that they are kind, it's that they are passive.