Treating the BF or Husband worst than a stranger

[Ranger]

What the fvck does socialism (workers' self-management and social ownership) have to do with how a woman treats her husband? And how is the post related to the title? I can sense something external about this, have you been listening to that clown Stefan Molyneux?

Wanted to get back to this first. This is pretty self evident.
The number one drive other than breeding with a man with more healthy DNA markers, is survival for herself and her children.
In the old paradigm men ran the show. The were controls on her breeding strategies.
Now that those are gone, she has to rob her husband or baby daddy to ensure her survival and still continue her breeding strategy.

This is unreliable in the long run. Men will sometimes give up and go into apathy. Thus she needs the tribe (the state) to secure her survival and the survival of her children. Particularly her sons.
In prehistory these women were cared for and the children raised. The boys going to the man group and his future mentors and the girls stayed with the women.
A really good example of this was Greece and the Spartans at their pinnacle of strength.

The only guarantee is a socialist/communist state. Leftism was and is propagated by the female gender.
This is so well documented that it’s barely worth mentioning. If a man is a socialist/communist, he carries his own noose for his own hanging and doesn’t even know it.

 

[Ranger]

Also Individual > species this makes me think that as a species we are doomed to extinction.

I am also at this point. Especially at seeing and experiencing even red pill guys being stuck in the wrong thought paradigm. The feminine imperative.

Yes doomed to possible extinction but most likely a reset. A return to primal conditions would correct it. A catastrophic reset of civilization.
Feminine men would not be allowed to breed.

 

[lamath]

I am also at this point. Especially at seeing and experiencing even red pill guys being stuck in the wrong thought paradigm. The feminine imperative.

Yes doomed to possible extinction but most likely a reset. A return to primal conditions would correct it. A catastrophic reset of civilization.
Feminine men would not be allowed to breed.

Ofc it will affect the sexual dynamic of the human species and in a way i think things wont last like they are now

But what i was sayingm is
I see it as self serving individual will ultimately destroy our species by doing whats best for the individual and not for the species.
We see it often with government more so in communist country, they use their position to gain power and they dont care how much its ultimately costing the population.
Example they are gonna push for legalization of some pesticide that has been suspected of causing cancer, but they dgaf because they are getting campaign money from same company.

 

[Ranger]

Go ahead man im lazy af
But id like to say that lots of stuff in there are not contentious but fact.

What i got out of this book is Sexual selection > Natural selection and thats why u see butt ugly bird with bright featherseven if it makes them a better pray to predator.

Also Individual > species this makes me think that as a species we are doomed to extinction.

Ok. Part of it is in this discussion and you’re right, it’s not full of conjecture it comes from breaking the DNA chain. People don’t know that most of our present civilization can be traced to four different women.

 

[Ranger]

Ofc it will affect the sexual dynamic of the human species and in a way i think things wont last like they are now

But what i was sayingm is
I see it as self serving individual will ultimately destroy our species by doing whats best for the individual and not for the species.
We see it often with government more so in communist country, they use their position to gain power and they dont care how much its ultimately costing the population.
Example they are gonna push for legalization of some pesticide that has been suspected of causing cancer, but they dgaf because they are getting campaign money from same company.

I see your point. We are in a very dangerous situation with a large section of society supporting it. Total feminine group agreement.
Tomorrow I will carry this post to the point about women treating strangers better than their BFs and husbands.

 

[lamath]

I see your point. We are in a very dangerous situation with a large section of society supporting it. Total feminine group agreement.
Tomorrow I will carry this post to the point about women treating strangers better than their BFs and husbands.

btw there is also the book Sex at Dawn that might be very good, did not read it yet however.

 

[AJ84]

What makes you think they do? The internet?

15 minute sarge will tell you a different story. Really is that simple.

Unless you are talking about women that you aren't sexualising in any way, in which case it's comparing apples and oranges. Probably mistaking excellent customer service with proper affection or something lol

Never had a girlfriend in my entire life treat me worse than a stranger, and no idea what you are going on about.



I quite agree with that. Fearful boundaries can be hamstered into "being alpha" extremely easily. Ego.

Can't necessarily blame guys neither. I've noticed a big difference in how men are being raised now to be vulnerable while women are being taught very young to protect themselves more.

What is a big turn off is when guys start becoming extreme like a lesbian in a gender studies class and try and undermine any sort of relationship between the sexes. I see that as two sides of the same coin.

Yeah, there’s a lot similarities between some of the posts and the way that hard core feminists see men and society. Very similar.

It is what it is.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

Yeah, there’s a lot similarities between some of the posts and the way that hard core feminists see men and society. Very similar.

It is what it is.

Join a group complaining and it becomes you.

 

[AJ84]

[

Join a group complaining and it becomes you.

That is spot on. I’m going to remember that saying!

 

[mrgoodstuff]

[

That is spot on. I’m going to remember that saying!

So we need to focis on the good in life. Lol.

 

[Ranger]

This thread is in no way a complaint. I’m not doing it for me.
I already know how it works I’m at complete peace and actually support the way the biology works.
Degradation of the Y chromosome is the wrong guys producing offspring.
Very nice deflection AJ

 

[mrgoodstuff]

I see your point. We are in a very dangerous situation with a large section of society supporting it. Total feminine group agreement.
Tomorrow I will carry this post to the point about women treating strangers better than their BFs and husbands.

Have you ever figured out this type of woman is a "hater"? That she will come to hate anyone she is close to? Man shouldnt feel bad about it. Nor should he feel there was necessarily anything in his control other than not to be with her.

 

[Ranger]

Have you ever figured out this type of woman is a "hater"? That she will come to hate anyone she is close to? Man shouldnt feel bad about it. Nor should he feel there was necessarily anything in his control other than not to be with her.

I don’t see any of them as haters. Resentment isn’t hate. Resentment of her BF or husband is the end byproduct and a biological response.

Emotions are governed by the endocrine system as responses. Genes can be turned off and on by what we do and think. This is medical fact.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

I don’t see any of them as haters. Resentment isn’t hate. Resentment of her BF or husband is the end byproduct and a biological response.

Emotions are governed by the endocrine system as responses. Genes can be turned off and on by what we do and think. This is medical fact.

Wow sir. Your missing a personality type thats quite widespread.

 

[AJ84]

This thread is in no way a complaint. I’m not doing it for me.
I already know how it works I’m at complete peace and actually support the way the biology works.
Degradation of the Y chromosome is the wrong guys producing offspring.
Very nice deflection AJ

So today’s men who women choose to breed with are seen in a negative light by you. Those men are provider cucks or whatever and those women will use them for survival then get their kicks from the real men, the men they didn’t choose to breed with. The men they will be nicer to?

Today’s men choose what women they want to marry, If I wasn’t chosen am I’m going to rationalize that? I’m going to say biology/ history/ genes etc made them choose those ‘loser’ women but I’m one of the women who those men really want and will cheat with? But 4000 years ago I would of been the chosen one. 4000 years ago those women wouldn’t even be considered?

Sorry but this is what this seems like to me Ranger.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

So today’s men who women choose to breed with are seen in a negative light by you. Those men are provider cucks or whatever and those women will use them for survival then get their kicks from the real men, the men they didn’t choose to breed with. The men they will be nicer to?

Today’s men choose what women they want to marry, If I wasn’t chosen am I’m going to rationalize that? I’m going to say biology/ history/ genes etc made them choose those ‘loser’ women but I’m one of the women who those men really want and will cheat with? But 4000 years ago I would of been the chosen one. 4000 years ago those women wouldn’t even be considered?

Sorry but this is what this seems like to me Ranger.

Right. Every man in society is more of a man that her own man. Something seems fishy like a agenda? Its bullshyt ranger thats what it is.

 

[lamath]

The irony of someone keep slating the website's readers for being ""passives"" whilst basically relying that his audience be and writing thousands word essays that can be destroyed out at anyone's lunchtime is really very silly.



Is that right?

Perhaps you can stop writing essays, stop the book club, get some fresh air with a 15 minute field test?

You maybe not, but Ranger then.

It's simple. The assertion was that women's inclination being toward better treatment of strangers than boyfriends [not exactly a small assertion to make given the far reaching implications which are so wrong to be laughable] and my reply being that is quite possibly the biggest load of rubbish which i'm pretty much 100% certain anyone else will see in a short field test in the most clear way.

It'll be especially clear to the guys who have a girlfriend in the contrast.

Not only is the idea nonsense - but as I say that fearful boundaries are quite natural and should be well allowed for in a general sense - the entire motif is both misleading and extremely detrimental. The typical mgtow/lesbian stuff of "LTR's are feminine imperative/patriarchy. Tell me why not!".

That's no reflection on Rollo's work which is very good, just the way it's being used in part that i've seen recent is very weird. Not combined with infields and verging well off.

That's my opinion. Feel free to disagree.

Sorry i read alot and i like to educated myself

I wont argue about this it will be pointless, i dont think you are open to seeing others point of view


But id like to add that its not only women who does that it is also men
You can see it in conjugal violence and its not only against women, 20% of conjugal violence is against men.
And then there is the psychological violence that is more on the women side of the equation.

They dont do those things to complete stranger

 

[Ranger]

So today’s men who women choose to breed with are seen in a negative light by you.

Flunk. I am one of those they choose to breed with.
I’m just not cuckable.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

Flunk. I am one of those they choose to breed with.
I’m just not cuckable.

Well if you get in a relationship she can perform the WWE "piledriver" cvck move on you. Its a game to them and they enjoy it.

 

[Ranger]

Sorry i read alot and i like to educated myself

I wont argue about this it will be pointless, i dont think you are open to seeing others point of view


But id like to add that its not only women who does that it is also men
You can see it in conjugal violence and its not only against women, 20% of conjugal violence is against men.
And then there is the psychological violence that is more on the women side of the equation.

They dont do those things to complete stranger

Yeah. Don’t waste your breadth brother. Lol
This has been hijacked by a girl and her lap dog.