Treating the BF or Husband worst than a stranger

[Ranger]

Why would a woman obtain an LTR or marry a man only to treat him worse than a stranger, or some cute guy at work she has a crush on, or some guy who talked to her at the grocery store and made her tingly? If you think your “love” and “devotion” will prevent this, you are sadly mistaken. If you think that your money or strength of connection will, or your six pack and 8-inch dik will, you are sadly mistaken. If you think your integrity, honor and awesomeness will prevent it, you are sadly mistaken.

Obviously not all women will act on impulses. Especially if she knows she has a low SMV.
First off, framed in the idea of family and civilization and society as we now know it, it would be impossible. In fact, it was never possible. Women were never meant to exist and operate in civilization as we know it. Civilization hinders and obstructs her biological breeding strategy. Being “civilized” is her enemy when it comes to breeding and offspring.

Today lots of women complain about the patriarchal nature of civilization. Basically, men running the show. Marriage was NOT designed for women. I’ve never believed that it ever was. However, the modern woman knows that it is the only way she can obtain care and provisions is by marriage. Therefore, fundamentally women are socialist/communist. The tribe ensures her survival while she performs her breeding strategy. Her sons, at an early age went and lived with other boys under the guidance of men and mentors. I haven’t found an early civilization that did not do this.

Marriage was a creation of the church and civilization to get men to be dedicated to work and productivity needed to build civilization. If you give him a family, he turned into a working fool. He gets saddled with that responsibility in exchange for having a woman and opportunity to procreate. Many men, even today, do not get to procreate. Their DNA line ends there. More so when in earlier times.

Women are dealt fairy tales of glorious weddings and eternal love, but the fairy tale never goes past the surrender of man and woman to each other. It abruptly ends. There’s no more story. There’s not supposed to be more story. There’s no such thing.
Women wave been slowly eroding civilization through law and pushing the concept that they are equal in all ways. Eventually, for most men, there will be no reason to really work all that hard and thus also end up socialists/communists.

They have human male drives, but prostitution is illegal and carries a social stigma if you’re found out. For civilization to work you must have a wife and the dream of the eternal family. Think about that. Married men have jobs that they work very hard at and seek to go up in rank because they have mouths to feed. He has to suffer through hard interviews whereas the sexy girl or woman gets easy light treatment and lots of smiles from the men in interviews. I’ve seen it with my own eyes. Its revolting. As a rule, the hard working Beta/cuck Husband is a superior man when viewed through the lens of civilization.

Men will keep an incompetent attractive woman employed so they have something to look at and get rid of fat incompetent women. So, women with lower SMV are generally more competent than higher SMV women, a fact of life that women know well. They know the breeding game. It’s men who are ignorant.

Don’t want to write a book so will do this in parts so its easier to grasp. Comment whatever you want.

 

[lamath]

Women are dealt fairy tales of glorious weddings and eternal love, but the fairy tale never goes past the surrender of man and woman to each other

This i think is prob one of the biggest prob why women dont stay with their Man.

Ive seen it many time Unrealistic expectation, that then turn into resentment.
imo it all about how a women was raise from early childhood.
Biggest problem now is social media, where ppl only show a filtered version of their life, so its kind of brainwash them into always wanting more and more.

 

[sosousage]

women are nice things

 

[Ranger]

women are nice things

Of course they are. Lol
I’m the last person to be critical of women as a whole.

 

[Ranger]

Women lived under restraints to their breeding strategy fo quite a while.
A “controlling man”, IS trying to restrain her breeding strategy and she knows it.

Now that they are participants in government, it is an unsolvable situation for the average man.
In the past men would have as many women as they could muster. This left many men without women. This is biologically correct and I support it.
You are not owed a woman to bear your children. In fact, if you think it is owed, you don’t deserve children. You don’t even deserve sex.

In order to build a world, polygamy was outlawed so that more men could have a woman. But these women are carrying around ancient biological programming. There is no way they are going to have a baby with most men. There is absolutely no way her biology will let her breed with men who don’t have at least some of the fitness markers.

So what does that tell you? Over 80% of the woman married, have settled for some markers but even the hottest, sexiest women will be able to get even most of the markers in a man. That man doesn’t exist. Well maybe .00000001 in a billion in the western world.

So her only recourse is to have TWO men. One to keep her alive and one to breed with. If you think that your love and duty and honor will land you a good woman...you’re an idiot. In will make sure you won’t if you are wanting offspring.

Women resent civilization’s influence on their breeding strategy. It is unexpressed resentment. It filters through her and she expresses it in many observable ways.

This is why you as a BF or Husband, are a pivot. If you are a skilled, aware man, you are going to only tolerate so much. Resentment. You will lay a boundary upon who she can breed with. This restriction did not exist at the dawn of man. She automatically floated to the most competent men and that was that. That man bred her and you were out. Plain and simple. If he wanted her of course.

In the face of civilization, you will not find a woman who won’t pivot on you. Ever.
If you want loayalty then you best get a lower SMV woman. Otherwise, you must submit yourself to the gauntlet.
A biologically primitive woman in a civilization. She can adapt but she can’t change her feelings. That biological breeding program is the ruler of those feelings. There’s nothing she can do about it. She can put her own restrictions and restraints on herself but if you do it, just remember, there will be some resentment. It will go up and down per her menstruation cycle.

I do not believe that even in the 40’s and 50’s that women were not battling their feelings from the breeding imperative. I think it was more covert.

I told the story here on the forum about my grandmother’s days as a teenager in the depression. She was from Hays Kansas. During the depression migrant workers would ride the rods (trains) into town for harvest.
The young women and even some farmer’s wives would fuk the transient workers. If they happen to get pregnant they would just go sleep with a farmer kid and then tell him she was pregnant. Out of honor he would marry her of course.
My grandmother knew of three single girls who got pregnant in one season. She didn’t know how many farmer’s wives had gotten pregnant but it wasn’t an issue as the husband would just assume it’s his.

So these women would hook men to raise their bastard kids as their own. It is unknown how many farmer’s wives were using their husband as pivots to get serviced by breeders.
So the good old days weren’t good old days.

In this world, if you are a BF or a Husband, you are a pivot. Whether she acts on it or not. Her heart is already yearning for it. It’s her nature.

In this light, most of the posts here in the forum and most of the reply’s are coming from the feminine imperative.

 

[AttackFormation]

What the fvck does socialism (workers' self-management and social ownership) have to do with how a woman treats her husband? And how is the post related to the title? I can sense something external about this, have you been listening to that clown Stefan Molyneux?

 

[mrgoodstuff]

What is it about the "type" who does this? This is a problem men have suffered. In my opinion you cant do anything but let her go. Oh. The alternative of hanging with whom you hang with socially.

 

[lamath]

What the fvck does socialism (workers' self-management and social ownership) have to do with how a woman treats her husband? And how is the post related to the title? And a bunch of other smaller things. I can sense something external about this, have you been listening to that clown Stefan Molyneux?

I never listen to Molyneux
Jordan Peterson is also very anti-socialist / communist and he do make lots of valid point.

Ranger is making some good point, but i dont agree completely with the fact that is all biological.

Even if women imperative points them towards hypergamy you can also say that men imperative is to produce as many offspring as possible, in short women are always searching for an upgrade and men are always searching to **** more women.

Atm there is so many reason why things turned out like that.
Social media, the Disney princess and romance book.
An other factor is how children are raise, school also have changed and not in a good way imo they promote mediocrity because they dont want to hurt the child feeling.


Then you get weak ass chidren that gets anxiety attacks and depression because they dont know how to face hard time.




Medical advancement is imo the main reason with birth control pill, condom and abortion it end up changing the sexes social dynamic.
In the past children were the main occupation of women, no time for higher education and no time for work,, that why they needed a man to marry and provide for them.
Alot less #metoo stuff because women were not on the work force basically stuck at home with the children.



Now men imperative gets shackle with some extreme outdated paternity laws and metoo ****.
(imo in the past paternity law needed to be that extreme for the well being of mother and child, now when a women gets pregnant its because she choose to)
And women imperative is getting the 1 up, mostly because they control child birth and society is over compensating for their past treatment.

 

[AJ84]

Sounds a bit like Animal Husbandry lol I think it’s just the overuse of the terms ‘breeding’ and ‘bred’. For a minute there I thought I was reading about cows.

But for those who feel the way you do, luckily, you don’t live in a society where you have to get married, breed, or even have a girlfriend. You can just causally date and live life completely for yourself, if that’s what you want.

2019.

 

[lamath]

Sounds a bit like Animal Husbandry lol I think it’s just the overuse of the terms ‘breeding’ and ‘bred’. For a minute there I thought I was reading about cows.

But for those who feel the way you do, luckily, you don’t live in a society where you have to get married, breed, or even have a girlfriend. You can just causally date and live life completely for yourself, if that’s what you want.

2019.

I find it sad that no one stays together anymore,or if they do they are miserable, but its getting more and more like that.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

I find it sad that no one stays together anymore,or if they do they are miserable, but its getting more and more like that.

Everyone is worried about self and what they want. They dont care about being a unit.

 

[lamath]

Everyone is worried about self and what they want. They dont care about being a unit.

Being in a team is way more rewarding than playing solo

Sadly when some players in the team suck or are ******* they are traded for younger and better players lolllll

 

[AJ84]

I find it sad that no one stays together anymore,or if they do they are miserable, but its getting more and more like that.

I don’t personally know every couple so I can’t agree or disagree with you there.

I know I’m happy, and I know other couples that are too. And couples that are not happy. It’s a mixed bag, like most relationships and friendships and human interaction in general.

 

[Ranger]

What the fvck does socialism (workers' self-management and social ownership) have to do with how a woman treats her husband? And how is the post related to the title? I can sense something external about this, have you been listening to that clown Stefan Molyneux?

Lol don’t know who that is. I didn’t want to write a book so I’m breaking it up. Getting to it.
Politics are an aberration.

 

[AJ84]

Everyone is worried about self and what they want. They dont care about being a unit.

I think it’s scary, taking the risk. And it is a risk of the heart right? I personally think that’s it more that people are sacred to invest based on past experiences and I felt that way too. I understand why someone who has been burned doesn’t want to risk that again.
It’s messy.

 

[Ranger]

Everyone is worried about self and what they want. They dont care about being a unit.

A unit is a tribe. The whole group. The woman could set her stuff next to any man she wanted if he would take her.
A family unit is a social construct.

 

[lamath]

I don’t personally know every couple so I can’t agree or disagree with you there.

I know I’m happy, and I know other couples that are too. And couples that are not happy. It’s a mixed bag, like most relationships and friendships and human interaction in general.

Ask me 5 year ago if i was happy in my relationship i would have said yes, over the years lots of thing can change.
Some ppl are lucky but not many once kids are born dynamic change greatly.

 

[lamath]

I think it’s scary, taking the risk. And it is a risk of the heart right? I personally think that’s it more that people are sacred to invest based on past experiences and I felt that way too. I understand why someone who has been burned doesn’t want to risk that again.
It’s messy.

Scare to invest is the reason why so many new couple fail, but after many years together its not.

 

[AJ84]

Ask me 5 year ago if i was happy in my relationship i would have said yes, over the years lots of thing can change.
Some ppl are lucky but not many once kids are born dynamic change greatly.

When couples fall into roles that exclude dating each other, that’s when things tend to go downhill.
Life happens and the kids have soccer, bills have to be paid, roof has to be fixed, working 5 days a week and errands on the weekends etc etc.
People say they don’t have time for stuff. No, we don’t make time for stuff, like dating our spouses. Life gets in the way of that connection when we let it.
I know a female friend who for the first three years of her son’s life would not go out without him. She would not go to dinner or a movie or a weekend holiday because she was one of those nervous mothers who thought her son would die if she wasn’t there. It upset her husband, understandably because they both needed a break and to have time just the two of them.
It’s so important to have that. That’s one of the top lessons I took from my last failed relationship when I put my ego aside and really looked inward. Making time not matter what is going on.

 

[Ranger]

I’m not closed minded about this. Please do tell us why women treat strangers better than their husbands and BFs.