taiyuu_otoko
Master Don Juan
Dude I've spend nearly 3 whole days messaging women online and it's gotten me nowhere
You sound a like a 500 lb fat guy who's been jogging for a WHOLE WEEK and is mad he doesn't have a six pack yet.
Dude I've spend nearly 3 whole days messaging women online and it's gotten me nowhere
You guys love to justify how absurdly one sided dating is with all kinds of ridiculous analogies.You sound a like a 500 lb fat guy who's been jogging for a WHOLE WEEK and is mad he doesn't have a six pack yet.
Just a head's up, whining about how hard life is isn't generally a trait women find attractive in men.You guys love to justify how absurdly one sided dating is with all kinds of ridiculous analogies.
I don't believe that it's any harder for Dave. I think he's probably closer to the " norm " in terms of dating difficulty.I don't have to. Some have gotten messages from actual male models. Some get messages from men who live in mini-mansions. I know one woman who got a message from a guy who works for NASA.
None of those men got the date, Dave, despite looks, money or title. Why? Because:
1) Not all women are immediately sold on just looks or just money
2) These men either didn't know how to handle themselves with women, or came off as entirely playa and untrustworthy. They all displayed some type of flaw in persona, behavior, etc.
3) Many of these women had already dated men solely on looks, money, title and other factors, and they found it wasn't all peachy pleasantries. They know the darker side and the trade offs involved.
You make a lot of assumptions, Dave.
You assume it is so easy for them mostly because of how hard it is for you....
there's a few variables to thisI don't believe that it's any harder for Dave. I think he's probably closer to the " norm " in terms of dating difficulty.
I think he's just assuming it's easier for others so he can cry, whine and baby b1tch about it, suck his thumb and hunt for reassuring pats on the back, since he's such a victim.
After all, if it's easier for all of them, and, unlike him, they are less than average narcissists - then he MUST be a victim of some unexplainable phenomenon
*Poof* not his fault
As usual, wrong wrong wrongthere's a few variables to this
1)I live in suburbs and hate living in Chicago, so I'm around older people and families a lot. I only see women my age at gyms, malls and bars... all of which have a very high difficulty curve. I can't live in city - I like my big house, garage, safe neighborhood, etc... I can't live in apartment in city.
2)I have a somewhat specific taste. I like dark features, curvy body type- in addition to the normal compatibility requirements that everyone else has.
3)I don't look as good in pics as in real life
4)I hate cold approaching as I never know what the hell to say
So i don't know what my answer is. It seems like the only men who get any interest on dating sites from anybody quality are in legit 8.5 to 10 range. I did everything as amante told me in terms of my profile and messages and I'm getting nothing
I hate cold approaching and I don't meet anything quality through social circle. I've had a bunch of women interested in me through social circle but its all garbage, none of them are anywhere near my type.
I would agree borderline 7 on face (keep in mind I'm better looking in real life) but I'm in excellent shape - I have that ideal beach body now. It's interesting how different male and female ratings go.I think it is harder for Dave because he makes it harder.
He has 7.5-8 looks (with the body of a 9, don't forget), who is also successful and charming and loved... and so he expects to play the field as if he is an 8.5+ type of guy.
But in reality he is a 7, with no game, is afraid to approach women and is rife with desperation.... which is why he gets the results he gets.
Dave cannot make sense of his results because he doesn't know what league he's really in, no less how to play it and what to improve specifically to move up.
I think he can do much better than this, but it will never happen. A level of revelation and humility is needed to identify true issues, address them and to start making true progress. He resists that at all costs.
which part is wrong. Elaborate pleaseAs usual, wrong wrong wrong
No Dave, you did a couple of things I told you to do... and then erased the intended benefits by going rogue with your own ideas.
I told you to get the right pics first. You didn't do that. You picked a few and rolled right into OLD with less than ideal pics.
I gave you some material to toss into your ad, but all of the excessive messaging you did squashed whatever perception those words created.
I told you to post and bail. Check in daily. You went on a messaging rampage instead.
You actually did very little of what I told you to do, and just like you claim it is the fault of women when you fail, you now want to claim my advice has been ineffective.
Still your fault @Amante Silvestremy ad is almost exactly the same as your ad, maybe 2 words changed
I would have received nothing if i didn't go on messaging spree. I've had lots of women view my profile and not message me
my pics were rated as a 7 to 7.6 for attractiveness on photofeeler. I don't know if I can get much higher than that. I'm not a 9 or a 10/10. On a good day now, with how lean i am, I'm maybe a 7.5 to 8 in the face
if I get pics that are rated in the 9 range, MAYBE it changes something but i doubt it
how is that his fault?Still your fault @Amante Silvestre
Smh
but a 7.5 for attractiveness is still solidI said work on the right pics first. That takes time. It took me hundreds of photos to finally get a few that rated higher than the rest. I've actually ran pics that were nearly identical, but rated 10%+ different just because of a facial expression or a smile.
Had you done this first, your ad likely wouldn't even be up yet.
You had to go on a messaging spree because you posted subpar pics.
Lol. I'm not a 10 either Dave.
Once again, I told you there is a lot more going on with pictures than just your looks. A certain facial expression, a certain smirk or smile. These all convey things on their own. A higher rating on Photofeeler would have given you a clue as to which pics convey these intangible things outside of looks alone. You cannot be the judge of that, Dave. You have to get the feedback from others.
You just chose pictures YOU think are good. Not pics WOMEN think are good.
That is not for you to decide.
Because you've never done it.
I've done it.
you did not reply to what I said. Reply to thisHis replies all start with/contain "but"
Meaning "forget everything you just said, im going to disregard all that because here's how I see that it is"
You do not compel me to reply to you. I pick and choose what I want to say, when I want to say it.you did not reply to what I said. Reply to this
which part is wrong. Elaborate please
aren't you old? keep in mind I'm going after 23 to 28 year olds. Of course women above 30 are not as picky but that's irrelevant for me
I'm doing everything as amante told me to do with OLD (in terms of messages and profile) and getting absolutely nothing. I need to be in 9-10/10 range and I'm just not that attractive unfortunately.
It is not compelling, Dave.
Radical change? No.
But the dynamics change.
Right now those messages you're sending out are your very first line of presentation. My words are rendered ineffective because they aren't the first words read. They are reading your words instead.
With subpar pics, you have to have a silver fvcking tongue or an exception level of humor/wit. etc to get a woman interested in you when you approach it in this way, if they even read your message at all. You do not have a silver tongue, Dave.
But when you have pics that a woman wants to click on when she sees, then she reads something that makes her smile/laugh.... well then.... she is more likely going to initiate.
Chasing women who don't even know you exist vs. responding to women interested in initiating things with you are two completely different things.
Your own head prevents you from achieving the latter.
stop participating in this thread if you're not going to seriously respond to real questionsYou do not compel me to reply to you. I pick and choose what I want to say, when I want to say it.
You are pathetic
Umm, again, you don't compel me to contribute or not. I'll do what I want.stop participating in this thread if you're not going to seriously respond to real questions
if you're over 30, your opinions are invalid. I'm looking for 25 year olds
Then find a forum full of 23 - 28 yr old women and ask for their advice. Better yet, send DMs to the Instagram models you follow and get their feedback. I mean they are the types you want so who better to get dating and grooming tips from then the women you want most to impress.stop participating in this thread if you're not going to seriously respond to real questions
if you're over 30, your opinions are invalid. I'm looking for 25 year olds