Why the Kavanaugh nomination circus should scare the sh*t out of each and every one of you

[btownbuck2012]

1. Kavanaugh will get voted in as he should.

2. Do NOT, under any circumstances, date or f*ck a feminist. Ever.

That is all.

 

[Von]

Trump is laughing is way straight to the bank.

Kavanaugh is likely innocent

It was probably one of the usual US/English Canada: Let's get drunk and gangbang the virgin girl, to which the girl is of course fully willingly and just has much drunk than the guys.

The Democrats are using Rape as a political tool, the real rape victim are the losers in this story (they already have issues being recognized).

Why Trump is laughing?
1. If Kavanaugh get nominated... he will get his judge
2. If Kavanaugh get nominated.... people will find the ''supreme court'' to be corrupted and lose it legitimacy (Trump job has been to destroy the White House and Discredit the Federal governement... drain the swamp)
3. If Kavanaugh doesn't pass.... The republicans will be forced to support Trump in his elections

 

[EyeBRollin]

By all accounts, Kavanugh is as close to a boy scout as you can find in Washington.

That's not saying much. Congress has its fair share of folks with criminal records, history of drug abuse, infidelities and failed marriages, and a hotbed of bribery.

Married father, goes to church, coaches his daughters' basketball team, the whole nine yards. Nominated and appointed to numerous important government jobs in the past; thoroughly investigated as part of the process. His co-workers love him. His ex's all say that he is a 'perfect gentleman'.

Again, that's really not saying much. The fact that he gets praise for such is a problem. Why are your standards so low?

Squeaky clean record. Yet, his life and career are about to be destroyed by a single, unproven allegation from 36 years ago.

Although confirmation seems likely, how is a Federal judge potentially not getting one of the most powerful positions in the United States government classify as "life being destroyed?"

Kavanaugh is a conservative judge nominate by Trump. If Kavanaugh is appointed, he will tilt the balance of the Supreme Court towards conservatism for decades. He will be the tie-breaking vote on cases involving highly controversial social issues, like abortion and the Second Amendment. His appointment will, quite literally, have a profound impact of the future political direction of the country.

The balance of the Supreme Court has been conservative for the last two decades. Replacing Kennedy doesn't change it at all.

Kavanaugh’s accuser is a liberal, pvssy hat wearing professor from California. She is a registered Democrat, attended anti-Trump protests, and considers herself part of the 'resistance'.

Insulting her political views does not discredit her testimony.

The liberals have been freaking out about the Kavanaugh nomination and trying to do everything in their power to thwart it. Three days prior to the confirmation vote, the Democrats release the accuser's letter containing an allegation about something that allegedly happened in high school while Kavanaugh was teenager -- an allegation that is impossible to prove as much as it is impossible to disprove. Any intellectually honest person, regardless of their political leanings, can put two and two together and conclude that this is a hit job.

No, that is your incredibly biased speculation, as evidenced by your previous comment. "Liberals" freaked out about Neil Gorsuch, yet no misdeeds were brought against him. Why not pick a better nominee? A real "gentleman?"

Yet, Democrat men are perfectly happy to throw Kavanaugh under the bus, even though they could very easily become victims of similar false allegations themselves.

Here's a thought - if you don't rape women, you won't have rape allegations.

Women stick together and push the narrative that female accusers must always be believed. But men are all too happy to use made up allegations to destroy their opponents, even if, by doing so, they are digging their own graves. Any time you need to destroy a man’s reputation, all you need to do is find a female willing to accuse him of something…anything sexually inappropriate. And if the man is in a high-profile position, his accuser will become an overnight celebrity herself. TV interviews, book deals, countless likes on social media…being treated as a ‘hero’ of the Me Too movement. While I’d like to think that most women would not invent fake sexual assault/harassment allegations to gain celebrity status, there is no doubt in my mind that there are many who would.

Like I said, if you don't criminally mistreat women, you don't get criminal allegations. It's not hard to not rape women. Just don't do it. You're whining like a ***** about how men you are guilty of sexual misdeeds can't get away with it as easily as they used to.

I predict that there will be an epidemic of false allegations over the next decade…to a point where they will become commonplace as kind of modern day witch hunt. Initially, it will be limited to high profile politicians and celebrities but it will eventually trickle down into mainstream society.

The majority of the allegations won't be false, pal. There is no incentive for a woman to throw away her own reputation and career to damage a man just for ****s and giggles. These women have just as much to lose.

Any one of you is a potential future victim.

Wrong. If you don't rape women, you won't be accused as such.

Any girl you have ever dumped or pissed off for some reason could one day wake up and decide that, for the past 20 years, she has been suppressing memories of some terrible thing you did one night when you were drunk at some party in high school or college. And then she will share her “Me Too experience” on social media. She will get attention, sympathy and many likes. And you will get fired from your job without an investigation or due process. Or worse.

You really have a convoluted mind if you think a women would literally throw her own life away to possibly get retribution on a man from 20 years ago.

Scary times we live in.

Get out of your frightened bubble and man up.

 

[EyeBRollin]

My god look at what politics in this country has devolved to. You people are so clueless about everything.

I notixe Democrats now trying to change and stall more. Saying crap like don't limit the scope. Don't make arbitrary deadlines. It was Democrats who called for a ONE WEEK investigation.

Democrats don't have any power in Washington. Kavannaugh could be nominated and confirmed without a single Democratic vote. Do you not understand this concept? If every Democrat votes no, Kavannaugh still gets confirmed. It doesn't matter squat what the Democrats "call for," they don't control anything. Your grievances are just mindless bitching.

How so? If anything, it validates how our courts operate. If there can be no evidence brought forth, there isnt a case. Period.

If you think for one second the liberals/dems would not have pursued a conviction if they had the slightest bit of evidence, you're wrong. The fact is this: her story was full of holes. Cant remember where it happened? Cant remember when it happened? Cant remember who was there? Her only witness said it definitely didnt happen. What next? Call Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny to see what they remember?

There is a thing called due process. There are things that are needed to warrant a conviction. Evidence, witnesses and non contradictory testimony are up there on the list. The Libs failed miserably with their last ditch efforts to gain this seat on the Supreme Court. Although they attacked every angle possible.

This was not a criminal court of law. This was a job interview where the applicant blatantly lied and showed naked partisanship for a positiion that is supposed to be non-partisan. It doesn't matter if there is "evidence" for or against Judge Kavannaugh, this was about his qualifications, temperament, and fitness to be an impartial judge.

Should we hold them on gossip? Hearsay? One person's faulty account of a night they cant remember? Yeah that makes sense. The bottom line is this- there was ZERO evidence to support furthering ANYTHING concerning her allegations. None. Zip. Zilch.

Why would he? Because you dont like him? Because the Dems dont like him? Again, zero evidence.

Democrats don't have to "like him." Liking him is irrelevant. They didn't like Neil Gorsuch. But Gorsuch wasn't accused of rape....

 

[EyeBRollin]

Our choice of a president certainly backs up those words.
For a bunch of people who think of themselves as independent thinkers, it is absurdly hilarious how conversations like this one turn into one big groupthink circle jerk.

That's all Trump supporters are. It's a cult. You're either in it or your a "liberal / socialist / SJW"

The Supreme Court is supposed to have honor as an institution. This debacle dishonors the court. For all of you people talking about there not being a criminal conviction, is that the standard we hold Supreme Court Judges to? If they are not in prison, then they must be a good guy? If that Kavanaugh piece of sh!t had one tiny bit of respect for the court, he would have withdrawn long ago. But his own career is more important to him than service to his country. Putting this piece of human scum on the Supreme Court is a "good versus evil" quest? Whoever believes that drank someone's kool-aid, whether you will admit it or not.

The United States government has no honor in any branch and is not even living up to being an illusion of democracy. The Republican Party is a fascist racketeering organization that steals wealth by exploiting white greivance culture wars and gives to corporate elites. The Democratic Party is the party for anyone else that still thinks the sham of a Democracy can be fixed. Independents are stuck oscillating between which option is less terrible at any given time. It's only a matter of time before it all implodes.

 

[redskinsfan92]

That's not saying much. Congress has its fair share of folks with criminal records, history of drug abuse, infidelities and failed marriages, and a hotbed of bribery.



Again, that's really not saying much. The fact that he gets praise for such is a problem. Why are your standards so low?



Although confirmation seems likely, how is a Federal judge potentially not getting one of the most powerful positions in the United States government classify as "life being destroyed?"



The balance of the Supreme Court has been conservative for the last two decades. Replacing Kennedy doesn't change it at all.



Insulting her political views does not discredit her testimony.



No, that is your incredibly biased speculation, as evidenced by your previous comment. "Liberals" freaked out about Neil Gorsuch, yet no misdeeds were brought against him. Why not pick a better nominee? A real "gentleman?"



Here's a thought - if you don't rape women, you won't have rape allegations.



Like I said, if you don't criminally mistreat women, you don't get criminal allegations. It's not hard to not rape women. Just don't do it. You're whining like a ***** about how men you are guilty of sexual misdeeds can't get away with it as easily as they used to.



The majority of the allegations won't be false, pal. There is no incentive for a woman to throw away her own reputation and career to damage a man just for ****s and giggles. These women have just as much to lose.



Wrong. If you don't rape women, you won't be accused as such.



You really have a convoluted mind if you think a women would literally throw her own life away to possibly get retribution on a man from 20 years ago.



Get out of your frightened bubble and man up.

A conservative Supreme Court would not have upheld Roe V Wade, an "assault" weapons ban, and the Individual Healthcare communist mandate.

 

[redskinsfan92]

My god look at what politics in this country has devolved to. You people are so clueless about everything.



Democrats don't have any power in Washington. Kavannaugh could be nominated and confirmed without a single Democratic vote. Do you not understand this concept? If every Democrat votes no, Kavannaugh still gets confirmed. It doesn't matter squat what the Democrats "call for," they don't control anything. Your grievances are just mindless bitching.




This was not a criminal court of law. This was a job interview where the applicant blatantly lied and showed naked partisanship for a positiion that is supposed to be non-partisan. It doesn't matter if there is "evidence" for or against Judge Kavannaugh, this was about his qualifications, temperament, and fitness to be an impartial judge.





Democrats don't have to "like him." Liking him is irrelevant. They didn't like Neil Gorsuch. But Gorsuch wasn't accused of rape....

Dude, your just a liberal hack. The fact you think a minority that is only down by one vote doesn't have sny power shows ignorance on your part. Just because someone has an R next to their name does not mean they are a Conservative.

 

[redskinsfan92]

My god look at what politics in this country has devolved to. You people are so clueless about everything.



Democrats don't have any power in Washington. Kavannaugh could be nominated and confirmed without a single Democratic vote. Do you not understand this concept? If every Democrat votes no, Kavannaugh still gets confirmed. It doesn't matter squat what the Democrats "call for," they don't control anything. Your grievances are just mindless bitching.




This was not a criminal court of law. This was a job interview where the applicant blatantly lied and showed naked partisanship for a positiion that is supposed to be non-partisan. It doesn't matter if there is "evidence" for or against Judge Kavannaugh, this was about his qualifications, temperament, and fitness to be an impartial judge.





Democrats don't have to "like him." Liking him is irrelevant. They didn't like Neil Gorsuch. But Gorsuch wasn't accused of rape....

Also, Kavanaugh did not lie. I havd gone through and looked at all the "lies" liberals claims he told. Turns out only liberals are lying.

 

[EyeBRollin]

A conservative Supreme Court would not have upheld Roe V Wade, an "assault" weapons ban, and the Individual Healthcare communist mandate.

You clearly don't understand the purpose of the Supreme Court.

Dude, your just a liberal hack. The fact you think a minority that is only down by one vote doesn't have sny power shows ignorance on your part. Just because someone has an R next to their name does not mean they are a Conservative.

There are 49 Senators that caucus with Democrats. There are 51 Republicans. Is 51 not a majority of 100 votes?

Also, Kavanaugh did not lie. I havd gone through and looked at all the "lies" liberals claims he told. Turns out only liberals are lying.

Lmao, you're so deep in the cult you can't articulate a logical comeback. "Liberals" have nothing to do with Kavanaugh having multiple accusations of sexual assault and his alcoholism.

 

[redskinsfan92]

You clearly don't understand the purpose of the Supreme Court.



There are 49 Senators that caucus with Democrats. There are 51 Republicans. Is 51 not a majority of 100 votes?



Lmao, you're so deep in the cult you can't articulate a logical comeback. "Liberals" have nothing to do with Kavanaugh having multiple accusations of sexual assault and his alcoholism.

Again, you thinking that it is simply Democrat vs Republican shows ignorance on your part. You accuse me of being part of a cult, yet spew a bunch of bluepill bs.

 

[redskinsfan92]

You clearly don't understand the purpose of the Supreme Court.



There are 49 Senators that caucus with Democrats. There are 51 Republicans. Is 51 not a majority of 100 votes?



Lmao, you're so deep in the cult you can't articulate a logical comeback. "Liberals" have nothing to do with Kavanaugh having multiple accusations of sexual assault and his alcoholism.

I fully know the purpose of the Supreme Court. It is apparent that you do not.

 

[Bible_Belt]

So, again, I ask where is the evidence?

Kavanaugh's victim has been in therapy her whole life because of his atttempted rape, all with well documented therapist notes. Do you care to spin some nutball conspiracy theory about how she did all that just for this moment? Or will you just admit, like all the republicans should, that he is guilty, but that is ok because he is a shill for the right wing corporate agenda? The goal of making billionaires richer is important enough that we should allow a rapist on the supreme court?

 

[Spaz]

Kavanaugh's victim has been in therapy her whole life because of his atttempted rape, all with well documented therapist notes. Do you care to spin some nutball conspiracy theory about how she did all that just for this moment? Or will you just admit, like all the republicans should, that he is guilty, but that is ok because he is a shill for the right wing corporate agenda? The goal of making billionaires richer is important enough that we should allow a rapist on the supreme court?

Others here have brought up some good valid counter arguments against ur stand.

However Danger has the propensity to feign ignorance and I predict will end up saying something to the effect of "how can I believe anything that's written/said/done?".

Typical modus operandi of someone wanting to end a conversation or debate. It's a waste of time and best to disengage.

If Dr. Ford participated in those alleged acts either willingly, coerced into it, pressured into it - thats consent by participating but later had feelings of regret or shame then that's not s€xual assault.

 

[Glassguy]

Kavanaugh's victim has been in therapy her whole life because of his atttempted rape, all with well documented therapist notes. Do you care to spin some nutball conspiracy theory about how she did all that just for this moment? Or will you just admit, like all the republicans should, that he is guilty, but that is ok because he is a shill for the right wing corporate agenda? The goal of making billionaires richer is important enough that we should allow a rapist on the supreme court?

None of the "well documented" notes say anything about a specific person, specifically Kavanaugh.

It is however well documented that she may have been assaulted. No evidence that it was him.
I'll just sit here and wait on that evidence. I'll be here a while lol.

 

[redskinsfan92]

Kavanaugh's victim has been in therapy her whole life because of his atttempted rape, all with well documented therapist notes. Do you care to spin some nutball conspiracy theory about how she did all that just for this moment? Or will you just admit, like all the republicans should, that he is guilty, but that is ok because he is a shill for the right wing corporate agenda? The goal of making billionaires richer is important enough that we should allow a rapist on the supreme court?

Her going to a therapist does not prove in any way that Kavanaugh assaulted her.

 

[EyeBRollin]

LOL if you don't rape women you won't have false rape allegations?

Rocket science, huh?

And the court has NOT been solid conservative. We know from history that it is always the SCOTUS conservatives who are considered wildcards in how they will land in the decisions, but always a forgone conclusion for the leftists on the court, party line everytime.

Was Anthony Kennedy, appointed by Ronald Reagan, not a conservative jurist?

Her going to a therapist does not prove in any way that Kavanaugh assaulted her.

What part of this being a job interview instead of a criminal case do you not understand?

 

[Bible_Belt]

I wonder why leftists hate evidence?

And I wonder why right-wingers love rapists so much.

 

[EyeBRollin]

1. So innocent people never get accused of things?

It happens to people who exercise poor discretion.

2. Does nothing to change the fact that the SCOTUS was not complete conservative in it's rulings.

It's not supposed to be. It there to interpret the constitution.

3. I don't give a fvck what the butthurt leftists want to call it. No evidence at all means he is cool in my book. I wonder why leftists hate evidence?

Why are you so angry despite your rapist still getting his promotion?

 

[EyeBRollin]

So if we accuse you of rape you are automatically guilty?

I love the leftist playbook.

Nope, no one said that.

If they call you a rapist then you are obviously a rapist. If you question the accusation then you are an oppresive misogynist.

Why would they be calling me a rapist?

Bible, you will finally gain credibility if you and your spanish inquisition friends can provide some evidence......5 pages in and still nothing has been forthcoming.

I'll raise my beer in toast to you when Kavanaugh gets confirmed. HAHAHAHAHAAAA!

LMAO, the evidence is not permitted to be released to the public. You can't say there is no evidence.

 

[EyeBRollin]

1. It can and does happen to people, regardless of "poor discretion".

False rape allegations are quite rare. As I reiterate, if not criminally guilty they are almost certainly guilty of exercising poor discretion in that situation.

2. I agree, and yet the leftist SCOTUS members are known to always go party line.

More mindless bitching about "leftists" who don't have the power to control anything.

3. I'm elated that your ilk are getting what they deserve #MilitaryTribunals. I just don't give a fvck whatever crybaby terms your side tries to spin things with.

Your "ilk" has been whining for five pages in this thread about how hard life has been for a wealthy white man with an ivy league education.