Well, that’s why it takes a Senate meeting of minds, investigations, and a majority to confirm a SC judge because one person can be just as likely to be wrong as he can be right.I am thinking more and more that he is guilty. I just hope he doesn’t get on the court.
Yep, quite a few people are, myself included. Seems like a political party has grabbed hold of the #Metoo movement and is trying to milk it for all they can get to accomplish their goal of obstruction…I am still waiting on ANY kind of evidence of guilt.
At least the deaths will likely be quick.Democracy is essentially a slippery slope.
The same thing that is happening here happened in Rome.
At first, the public elects people who do good.
Pretty good, people realize that in order to get elected they only need to promise stuff to people.
From a voter's standpoint, it's the best deal possible.
All you gotta do is vote and you get free shyte.
But eventually, so much free shyte is promised, and so many people actually BELIEVE they are entitled to free shyte, that it soon becomes evidence that everybody's expectation of the free shyte is more than the stuff that is available.
This goes beyond mere physical shyte.
This extends to recognition, special rewards for victims.
The end is not far.
When this fvcktrain finally goes off the rails, it will be the most bloody collapse in planetary history.
Much like the french reign of terror but much worse, since everybody's got guns. I would have hated growing up in the dark ages where if you met your demise in war, it was at the edge of a blade, and sometimes very slowly.
Funny thing is that the most vocal folks now are the liberals, most of which don't have guns.
When the population that owns guns (angry white men) decide to rise up, it's going to be a blood bath of the ages.
I say it comes from electing too many spineless people who are also severely lacking in character and morals. i.e., professional liars…Democracy is essentially a slippery slope.
The same thing that is happening here happened in Rome.
At first, the public elects people who do good.
Pretty good, people realize that in order to get elected they only need to promise stuff to people.
From a voter's standpoint, it's the best deal possible.
All you gotta do is vote and you get free shyte.
But eventually, so much free shyte is promised, and so many people actually BELIEVE they are entitled to free shyte, that it soon becomes evidence that everybody's expectation of the free shyte is more than the stuff that is available.
This goes beyond mere physical shyte.
This extends to recognition, special rewards for victims.
The end is not far.
When this fvcktrain finally goes off the rails, it will be the most bloody collapse in planetary history.
Much like the french reign of terror but much worse, since everybody's got guns.
Funny thing is that the most vocal folks now are the liberals, most of which don't have guns.
When the population that owns guns (angry white men) decide to rise up, it's going to be a blood bath of the ages.
The coin of societal decay has two sides.I say it comes from electing too many spineless people who are also severely lacking in character and morals. i.e., professional liars…
Well, unfortunately for them they don’t have enough sense to even realize this sh|t show they’re currently running will energize the other party’s base and some swing voters in Nov.This entire situation is about nothing more than the Dems/Libs trying to do anything and everything to gain the seat for power.
Nothing else. Unfortunately they didnt expect the Reps/Conservatives to be smart enough to see through their flawed plans.
Our choice of a president certainly backs up those words."As the politicians get sleazier and sleazier, the general population gets dumber and more entitled.
How so? If anything, it validates how our courts operate. If there can be no evidence brought forth, there isnt a case. Period.This debacle dishonors the court.
If you think for one second the liberals/dems would not have pursued a conviction if they had the slightest bit of evidence, you're wrong. The fact is this: her story was full of holes. Cant remember where it happened? Cant remember when it happened? Cant remember who was there? Her only witness said it definitely didnt happen. What next? Call Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny to see what they remember?For all of you people talking about there not being a criminal conviction
Should we hold them on gossip? Hearsay? One person's faulty account of a night they cant remember? Yeah that makes sense. The bottom line is this- there was ZERO evidence to support furthering ANYTHING concerning her allegations. None. Zip. Zilch.is that the standard we hold Supreme Court Judges to
Why would he? Because you dont like him? Because the Dems dont like him? Again, zero evidence.he would have withdrawn long ago
Uh....his career is ultimately his service to the country. Not sure where you are going with that one man. Same job, larger scale.But his own career is more important to him than service to his country.
Totally agree.The Supreme Court dishonored itself when it legalized murdering the innocent.
Yes, given enough time the truth of a persons credibility and intentions eventually surfaces…