article: Why Happy People Cheat
- Thread starter MatureDJ
- Start date
zekko
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 16,046
- Reaction score
- 8,876
My example is dependent on the woman being monogamous, not the man. Certainly the man can be monogamous, but not necessarily. And history is full of examples where the women were faithful but the men planted a lot of seeds. The main point is that you can be more certain that the child is yours if you are the only one banging her.
If you guys are so keen on sharing vaginas, and think it's so "alpha", why don't y'all get into some MMF threesomes? You can save time that way.
I wasn't aware that herpes, AIDs, or syphilus washed off.
The Duke
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2008
- Messages
- 5,592
- Reaction score
- 8,470
In the long term, I just don't see where women handle multiple partners very well. The effects of too many men causes too much mental damage.
And supporting this is giving your power away. Its another form of feminism.
I watched a documentary about the Mormons and Brigham Young. One of his wives wrote in her diary that she was happy to be in a polygamist relationship. She felt that it gave her more power and freedom to invest more in herself since she didn't have to focus all of her time on a husband. There were other women that could take care of him when she wanted to do something else. She could devote her time to running her business instead of looking after a husband. She thought this was really where feminism first started.
And supporting this is giving your power away. Its another form of feminism.
I watched a documentary about the Mormons and Brigham Young. One of his wives wrote in her diary that she was happy to be in a polygamist relationship. She felt that it gave her more power and freedom to invest more in herself since she didn't have to focus all of her time on a husband. There were other women that could take care of him when she wanted to do something else. She could devote her time to running her business instead of looking after a husband. She thought this was really where feminism first started.
Last edited:
Feminism's next big push will be test tube "designer" babies so that women can go through a list of sperm donors like a restaurant menu and genetically engineer the kids they want so they don't have to learn how to love a man lol.
Fruitbat
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- May 3, 2013
- Messages
- 3,424
- Reaction score
- 2,462
I feel my stomach turn for this "Brave New World" of human relationships.
The truth is, since we wandered out of caves and evolved past murder and tribal rape, nearly every civilised society has recognised the value of marriage and fidelity.
The main reason being that children from families with loyal and stable relationships are demonstrably better adjusted than children where men come and go. It is nearly always the mother who is the one source of stability in these families, and they tend to produce children who score lower in pretty much every department.
This mainly stems, I believe, from the narcissism epidemic, both male and female, that was referenced on another thread. "If the c0ck/pvssy wants it, why shouldn't I? It gives my self esteem a boost" This is the problem. It's actually quite a simple solution to murder ones enemies. This is why we have morality. Something which is missing with hedonistic narcs. If it feels good, do it.
The downfall of any society is through rubbishing the family unit. Show me any society on earth which acts in this nightmare of human relations which out succeeds one based on loyalty and fidelity. This is what turns the stomach. Loyalty. The lack of this is vile, and is repulsive to many people.
I'm not saying the odd person who has an affair should be burnt. Most people will have them. It's the shift in attitude from this being an error, to just another life choice. It's all gone nuts. Transgender kids, gender fluidity, it's all tied in with this "anything goes, no shame" attitude.
Note I am an Atheist. I do not come at this from a position of religious nutjobbery. However, I am behind the Christos on this one.
People who willingly enter this lifestyle are too full of their own needs and lacking in social rules and moral fibre.
The truth is, since we wandered out of caves and evolved past murder and tribal rape, nearly every civilised society has recognised the value of marriage and fidelity.
The main reason being that children from families with loyal and stable relationships are demonstrably better adjusted than children where men come and go. It is nearly always the mother who is the one source of stability in these families, and they tend to produce children who score lower in pretty much every department.
This mainly stems, I believe, from the narcissism epidemic, both male and female, that was referenced on another thread. "If the c0ck/pvssy wants it, why shouldn't I? It gives my self esteem a boost" This is the problem. It's actually quite a simple solution to murder ones enemies. This is why we have morality. Something which is missing with hedonistic narcs. If it feels good, do it.
The downfall of any society is through rubbishing the family unit. Show me any society on earth which acts in this nightmare of human relations which out succeeds one based on loyalty and fidelity. This is what turns the stomach. Loyalty. The lack of this is vile, and is repulsive to many people.
I'm not saying the odd person who has an affair should be burnt. Most people will have them. It's the shift in attitude from this being an error, to just another life choice. It's all gone nuts. Transgender kids, gender fluidity, it's all tied in with this "anything goes, no shame" attitude.
Note I am an Atheist. I do not come at this from a position of religious nutjobbery. However, I am behind the Christos on this one.
People who willingly enter this lifestyle are too full of their own needs and lacking in social rules and moral fibre.