TheMonkeyKing
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 2,337
- Reaction score
- 1,427
Without reading the thread, here is immediate impression regards OP....
Pro tips:
-Your own value will always be a minimum 8/10 - in times of doubt, fake until you make it; i.e. truly 'being the prize'.
-You are always a prize, because every day, as far as possible, you engage in self improvement.
-Never consider exclusivity with a woman with a lower value than your own - i.e. lower than an 8.
-Rarely will you consider exclusivity with anyone lower than a 9; an 8 can slide too easily back down to a 7.
-Every woman you meet starts as a 7/10. And, as a minimum, is a 7/10.
-A woman's value only increases value from forementioned 7/10 under burden of proof.
-Said burden of proof is an ongoing consideration.
-Screening always last a minimum of six months.
-Screening period will always involve sh!t tests to some extent.
-Screening will always introduce doubt about her worth, not yours.
-Her top trump score should outweigh sh!t testing and doubt. When testing and doubt take precedence, she's failed screening.
-Ninety percent of women will fail screening (hence you only consider exclusivity with 9/10's and above) (hence we need to be screening many candidates on an ongoing basis).
-Candidates might be re-screened in future appraisal, though maybe 70% of those will only result in failure again.
-Learn the difference between emotional investment and critical appraisal.
-As a man, replace emotional investment with rational, critical appraisal.
The ultimate solution is, don't get attached in the first place.How to detach yourself emotionally from a woman in whom you have already invested yourself emotionally?
As well as being the summary, this doubles as a list of all the reasons you should not have been invested (attached) in the first place; number one reason being, timeframe. You knew this girl for two months (i.e. 1/3 of your minimum screening period), and she showed you she wasn't worth your time.2-month fling with HB7.
Successful insertion of d!ck.
Encountered low interest (flakiness)
Stayed low contact to observe from afar.
Saw some red flags
Lack of sexual options kept me from hard nexting for 2 more weeks before I dropped her just now.
I have to argue that this is not entirely true, owing to the description of your situation above. If you think about it, you'll understand why I say this. She for one clearly doesn't consider you a prize. [I think you'd prefer an honest interpretation.] As results, you aren't questioning her worth, rather questioning your own (despite your claims).I believe that I'm the prize.
This belief is congruent with my behaviour, body language and actions.
Pro tips:
-Your own value will always be a minimum 8/10 - in times of doubt, fake until you make it; i.e. truly 'being the prize'.
-You are always a prize, because every day, as far as possible, you engage in self improvement.
-Never consider exclusivity with a woman with a lower value than your own - i.e. lower than an 8.
-Rarely will you consider exclusivity with anyone lower than a 9; an 8 can slide too easily back down to a 7.
-Every woman you meet starts as a 7/10. And, as a minimum, is a 7/10.
-A woman's value only increases value from forementioned 7/10 under burden of proof.
-Said burden of proof is an ongoing consideration.
-Screening always last a minimum of six months.
-Screening period will always involve sh!t tests to some extent.
-Screening will always introduce doubt about her worth, not yours.
-Her top trump score should outweigh sh!t testing and doubt. When testing and doubt take precedence, she's failed screening.
-Ninety percent of women will fail screening (hence you only consider exclusivity with 9/10's and above) (hence we need to be screening many candidates on an ongoing basis).
-Candidates might be re-screened in future appraisal, though maybe 70% of those will only result in failure again.
-Learn the difference between emotional investment and critical appraisal.
-As a man, replace emotional investment with rational, critical appraisal.
Last edited: