How about this?Honestly this semantics don't really matter the only thing that matters is that women do value the trait of being a challenge.
I already addressed the fact that you can't be such a challenge that you are actually not even available, which is what delayed texting does. If you ignore a narcissist for 4 days that means you have provided 0 narcissistic supply for 4 days... unacceptable. Better to be a challenge by withholding commitment, no azz kissing, and having options.
I wonder how she responded to you wanting to "spank her azz"It really is the worst time to be a man. Now you even have to pretend to care and stroke her ego all the way through the dating face by texting and then she just flakes you whenever.
I was suppose to have a date HB 6.5( hard to tell from pictures, could go both ways) over and she sorta flakes, telling me that I can travel to her place out of town for a simple walk or we do it tomorrow.
I just told her I could come over there and spank her azz now but would rather give her a pass this time and then spank her the same time tomorrow at my place. Its probably too much but I dont give a fuk anymore with this flaking sht.
I SHOULD probably have played comfort game but she wasnt hot enough and disrespected me so I was turned off.
In my language it was a better sentence but ofc the meaning is the same. Anyway, I gave her a few hours to reply and then deleted her. I just dont care about women who are not that attractive anyway, they can sit there with their little dogs, cats or desperate men.I wonder how she responded to you wanting to "spank her azz"
Right. That's how you can tell whose really in the field because if you are only texting to setup dates you will not get anywhere. This is not 2006. Text messaging is one of the biggest forms of modern communication. That "I don't like to text "shít doesn't work unless you're 45+Texting only to set up dates doesn't work anymore. Its an outdated concept.
It is not "aFc" to participate in a staple of modern communication. Your "dJInG" is not confusing her. You not being a person who lives in 2017 is.These girls are so USED to AFC behaviour, and now consider that the norm, that DJ'ing actually confuses them
Quote from a mutual friend of said plate:
"She says she thinks you are playing her because you ignore her and only ever talk to her if it's to go out or hook up"
Since you began to act like a normal human being.but it makes sense. Since then i dropped a few little texts here and there, had a few convos etc and things are going a lot smoother.
When you work 2005 game.It's not only this girl either, i have found many of them just seem to get confused and weird when you work typical game on them.
The rules changed way before 2017. The only text for dates shít became obsolete as soon as we made the change from flip phones.Is it time to re look at "the rules" for the year 2017?
If everyone else is jumping off a bridge, you gonna go do it to?Ohhhh, so it's great to see SOME of you guys are finally coming to terms that the Manosphere "cartoon character bullshyt" doesn't work.
I've had guys tell me that I shouldn't text as much, when it's 2017 and TEXTING is pretty much a standard form of communication these days. Following the cartoon advice of "don't text, just call and don't hold a long convo, only push for her to meet up" is the STUPIDEST fvcking shyt I've ever heard in my life. It doesn't work, it's never worked, and it's only relevant in this cartoon character fantasy land.
How are you still so lost on the concepts of game? What a woman thinks about you intellectually does not matter. It never has and never will. She can be frustrated, think you're a ****, insensitive, and full of ****. Guess what? If she likes you she will still go out with you.But even that doesn't mean not texting for 3 days........most women are just going to think you are full of shyt.
Right. That's how you can tell whose really in the field because if you are only texting to setup dates you will not get anywhere. This is not 2006. Text messaging is one of the biggest forms of modern communication. That "I don't like to text "shít doesn't work unless you're 45+
See, a lot of you guys are clueless. What is your objective with texting broads? Texting is simply not required to date them. Why are you so eager to give away the product (you) for free?It is not "aFc" to participate in a staple of modern communication. Your "dJInG" is not confusing her. You not being a person who lives in 2017 is.
No one is saying you need to text her every hour on the hour everyday. But a conversation every now and then over text is normal.
It just as nonsensical as meeting a chick in person and going: "I don't like to talk in person so I'll only text you."
Communiation and technology are coming together, technology is going to continue to play big roles in the way we interact. You cannot opt out.
Since you began to act like a normal human being.
When you work 2005 game.
The rules changed way before 2017. The only text for dates shít became obsolete as soon as we made the change from flip phones.
Correct.I spoke of a situation with a recent plate which i have started to encounter more and more often, especially in the younger (18-25) bracket
You play the game tight, minimal muck ups but something still going wrong, IL level seems to cap at about an 8/10 but not increase....
Then i noticed it.
These girls are so USED to AFC behaviour, and now consider that the norm, that DJ'ing actually confuses them
Why are you giving credibility to anything a woman says?Quote from a mutual friend of said plate:
"She says she thinks you are playing her because you ignore her and only ever talk to her if it's to go out or hook up"
For a minute this blew my mind because.. i followed the rules
No, it's not. Confusion is good. Women want to figure you out. That's attraction my friend. Women are more attracted to men when they are unsure of themselves and where they stand. She wants to figure you out. So much that she's telling other people. Why the hell are you ruining this? You were raising her interest level.but it makes sense. Since then i dropped a few little texts here and there, had a few convos etc and things are going a lot smoother.
It's not only this girl either, i have found many of them just seem to get confused and weird when you work typical game on them.
Is it time to re look at "the rules" for the year 2017?
I see a lot of guys are phonies. You can't possibly live in 2017. You dating in the the 18-28 range and you say texting is not required? You must be dating 5s and lowerSee, a lot of you guys are clueless. What is your objective with texting broads?
What are you talking about? What do you mean give away the product?Texting is simply not required to date them. Why are you so eager to give away the product (you) for free?
I don't know what happened to this forum. All of a sudden advice from bitches is taking precedent over the DJ Bible.
It's still important to be a challenge. It's just that presenting that challenge is slightly different.10 years ago, it was more important to be a challenge.
You are the product. Your time and attention are currency. Notice how you failed to answer my question. What purpose are you texting these broads?I see a lot of guys are phonies. You can't possibly live in 2017. You dating in the the 18-28 range and you say texting is not required? You must be dating 5s and lower
What are you talking about? What do you mean give away the product?
Texting is a staple in modern communication.
Investment is irrelevant. You've failed to established why you are texting. Everyone else doing it is not an acceptable answer. How is texting her helping you get in her pants?This is like saying talking is not required to date. Texting does not take any effort or investment.
No pretending necessary when you establish the frame of texting is pointless right off the bat. Women will either find another AFC to text, or they will actually go out with you.Thats why it's bullshít when you pretend to be too busy to text and women know this. They assume that you a purposely playing games, or that you are backwards and lame.
Technology will never overpower natural human behavior.Let me guess, you probably think instagram and other social media is a waste of time too. "Stay off social media, its pointless to men." Technology has changed the way we interact and communicate. It will continue to do so. Pretending that these changes don't effect you doesn't change them. It's only going to increase. In 5 years social media and real life will be seperated by a thin line.
Tell this to all the chicks I've smashed this year.Texting is required. Sorry.
This is the correct answer. All of this.Move in, create attraction, then bounce. HOW that happens is different, but the structure is the same.
That will never, ever change, (until maybe we evolve into Vulcans or something)
I didn't answer the question because its nonsensical. Like I said that's like asking "Why do you talk to women, how does that help you get in their pants."You are the product. Your time and attention are currency. Notice how you failed to answer my question. What purpose are you texting these broads?
You just don't know how to text."Getting to know them?" Jokes with no facial or body expressions.
Yeah, you must be 45+. That is not an insult. It is the only explanation for such belief. You and all the other older guys think this women in the 18-28 range beg to differ.Texting is lame.
This don't got nothing to do with what we're talking about rn. We can debate that seperately.And look at the state of "modern" dating. Look at all the AFCs out here running onto this forum about why they can't keep a chick longer than a few weeks.
The same reason you communicate with a woman any other way.Investment is irrelevant. You've failed to established why you are texting.
If you are asking this than you don't know how to text properly.Everyone else doing it is not an acceptable answer. How is texting her helping you get in her pants?
Then they wonder why you are so awkward. "Wow this guy doesn't text, use Facebook or evem know what Instagram is. He's straight from 2006!"No pretending necessary when you establish the frame of texting is pointless right off the bat.
Of course not but it certainly isn't reverting back to the flip phone days you are so fond of.Technology will never overpower natural human behavior.
I don't date women over 35.Tell this to all the chicks I've smashed this year.
No, it's not. Talking =/= texting. Talking can be done in person or on the phone. Details, my friend.I didn't answer the question because its nonsensical. Like I said that's like asking "Why do you talk to women, how does that help you get in their pants."
I don't have to know how to text. There is no upside.You just don't know how to text.
Modes of communication are not the same. Are you going to argue that texting is more effective with women than talking in person?The same reason you communicate with a woman any other way.
I'm 28. All the chicks on the roster are 23-32. My ex that is still stalking me from 3 months ago is 21. I've blocked her on 8 different mediums.Yeah, you must be 45+. That is not an insult. It is the only explanation for such belief. You and all the other older guys think this women in the 18-28 range beg to differ.
You don't relate to 95% of chicks in prime age range. Then you guys are confused when you can't keep a young chick around for longer than a few months.
Texting properly is not texting.If you are asking this than you don't know how to text properly.
I don't give a damn what women think of me. My frame is concrete. I don't text. If she wants my attention, she has to do it face to face. She has two options:Then they wonder why you are so awkward. "Wow this guy doesn't text, use Facebook or evem know what Instagram is. He's straight from 2006!"
Agreed. My life isn't so full of excitement that I have something new to talk about everyday. Honestly I think guys waste more headspace trying to think of what to text girls than what to do with their own lives.I ve had it work both ways. So given that then y would u bother taking the higher effort path. Keep messaging to a minimum and let the chips fall. Women r malleable. They re not going to start blacklisting u because u didn't become their personal text counsellor.
Personally it would also make me think about them too much. I ll think about a g/f not some random.
And her answer will be A, she will be busy entertaining the other dude who has been texting her all week and doing late night "cake" sessions with her on the telephone.If you don't give bitches attention over the phone, they are forced to do one of two things:
A) drop you
B) go out with you
How are you still so lost on the concepts of game?
Sir, most of the material in the DJ Bible comes from 2002 - 2005, we are talking 12 to 15 years ago, do you realize HOW MUCH the dating scene has changed since then?I don't know what happened to this forum. All of a sudden advice from bitches is taking precedent over the DJ Bible.
^^^ What he said.I see a lot of guys are phonies. You can't possibly live in 2017. You dating in the the 18-28 range and you say texting is not required? You must be dating 5s and lower
What are you talking about? What do you mean give away the product?
Texting is a staple in modern communication.
This is like saying talking is not required to date. Texting does not take any effort or investment. Thats why it's bullshít when you pretend to be too busy to text and women know this. They assume that you a purposely playing games, or that you are backwards and lame.
Let me guess, you probably think instagram and other social media is a waste of time too. "Stay off social media, its pointless to men." Technology has changed the way we interact and communicate. It will continue to do so. Pretending that these changes don't effect you doesn't change them. It's only going to increase. In 5 years social media and real life will be seperated by a thin line. Texting is required. Sorry.
That's fine. I don't want that girl. I have no time or desire to be an orbiter. Caking on the phone is a waste of time.And her answer will be A, she will be busy entertaining the other dude who has been texting her all week and doing late night "cake" sessions with her on the telephone.
The principles of human mating don't change. The intricacies may (how you meet, etc.) change, but women are still attracted to dominate masculine strength qualities. It's never going to change.Sir, most of the material in the DJ Bible comes from 2002 - 2005, we are talking 12 to 15 years ago, do you realize HOW MUCH the dating scene has changed since then?
Your whole philosophy is backwards. That's why you call things like frame "cartoonish." Good looks, finances, etc increase the amount of woman you can attract, but do nothing to keep the woman interested. Game is not about "convincing" women to like you. They have to already like you. Your job is to facilitate the mating dance.The Secret of The Jerk is he's usually with either good looks, good personality, or good financial structures, or a combination of the three. That's what makes him attractive and when you are ATTRACTIVE to a woman, you can usually get away with being a dyck. A fat, ugly, greasy, broke dude with horrible hygiene isn't going to get away with being a dyck, being a nice guy, or being anything to a woman.
Bruh no disrespect but your entire outlook on women on this forum is negative. Every thread you start is about how women aren't ****, dating is hopeless, and marriage is pointless. I don't think that helps your credibility on these sort of topics.The times have changed sir. My commentary comes straight from first hand field experience of dealing with these retarded females on a DAILY basis lol.
^^^ What he said.