Tenacity
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2014
- Messages
- 3,926
- Reaction score
- 2,194
It depends, if she were a hooker or a known hoe, then I would think she's just trying to make some money. If I'm a National, State, or Local celebrity that just got done performing, then I would think she's just a groupie.Tenacity, I think you might just have just nailed a weakness in your game.
Think about if you met a woman on the first date, and within the first few minutes of meeting you, she asks to come into your car, opens her legs, and begs you to fvck her. Wouldn't you think something is wrong with this woman?
But normally, yes, I would think something was strange but the only time this has happened to me was with hookers trying to make a dollar lol.
The reverse applies to men seeking relationships. When a man is vying to see a girl for the sole purpose of locking her down to exclusive relations, the woman thinks (although unconsciously) that something is wrong with this guy!
Science supports this point. While a woman produces one egg per month, and can be impregnated only once every 9 months, a man in the same nine months could impregnate countless women. Ergo, it's the woman's job to trap the man into exclusivity in those 9 months and thereafter to tend to her offspring, and not impregnate potentially hundreds of other women. It's not your job to chase exclusivity; it's hers.
Urgh, I mean I understand that you guys are making a biological point like T.O. was discussing earlier in relation to biology........but from my experience (again, this is just my experience) CULTURE TRUMPS BIOLOGY.Strong point Guru.
In a month, men can produce billions of sperm, but women only one egg. Men seek to dominate many; women seek to stabilize one.
Here is why following the breakup of an exclusive relationship, if a man were to initiate contact, it is unnatural and exemplifies weakness.
What do I mean?
If women were still choosing men based on biology....then broke men, weak men, and gay men would not be able to get laid. If women were still operating personally from historical biological standpoints, then women (even with Feminism) would STILL be opting to be a housewife and live under the "protection" of a strong male with a number of resources.
That's biology....and unfortunately that's not the way the market is working today, especially over here in the black community. Over in Black America, you don't even need a job, your own place, and you can be over 40 living with your mother. If you SAY what a chick wants to hear (which is basically confirming her new female independent role) you can fvck her. Many of these women want to be in CONTROL of their man, not submit to him, which goes against all traditional biological studies done on mating between the male and female species.
If your framework is biology, it says be the physically strongest male with the most resources, and you will get the most women.
If your framework is culture, it says be the smoothest talker, "fit into the cultural dynamics", and be a good bedroom sexer.
Unfortunately, most women of today's market operate based on culture rather than traditional biological frameworks. Culture determines the type of "personality" that's Alpha and the type of "personality" that's Beta.
Last edited: