Well since this happened in Canada I guess we're talking a worldwide scale now. Did you know there are now "misogyny laws" now in some towns in Britain that can get you arrested for flirting with women in public? You know that "manspreading" is now illegal on NYC subways? Now brace yourself for the real kicker: the law applies to white people too!
The law may apply to white people, but the brunt of people who are arrested and jail are blacks and hispanics. Some of these things are simply things that have to be googled to confirm what I am saying. However, the intent of this thread is not to start a discussion about race and the criminal justice system. The intent is to talk about "misogyny laws", as you say, and blame what happened to this man on such laws or societal standards.
BlueAlpha1 said:
You're sure all 326 of them were clean? Interesting how you give the police a 100% clean bill of sale when it comes to white victims, but you give them a 100% guilty verdict as you parrot the Black Lives Matter lies. This is called racism, actually.
I'm sorry, can you give me an example of any one of the 326 men who were killed because they approached a random woman in public?
I've provided an example of a black person on this thread. The only reason I've cared about this particular killing enough to post it is not because the man is black, or BLM, but because this appears to be a consequence of a rejection from a woman that may have not been anticipated by this man before he started interacting with these women. There have been many police killings of blacks and I never made a single thread about any of them until this particular one touched a nerve. You don't shoot or kill men who approach women, who flirt with women, or who even grope women. A man liking a woman and wanting some action transcends all racial boundaries.
BlueAlpha1 said:
Unarmed like Michael Brown, who robbed a store, assaulted a clerk, then got into a fight with a cop and tried to take is gun, before he was lawfully stopped?
Michael Brown did not flirt with any woman, therefore I'm not focused on that particular issue. If a woman is involved, then it's relevant to this discussion.
BlueAplha1 said:
There is nothing called white privilege. It's a myth. And the facts of the Turner case are very cloudy, it was hard to convict him to a heavy sentence because there is reasonable doubt that the woman had previously consented before passing out.
A woman is involved in the Turner case, therefore this case is relevant. He did not end up being beaten to death by the police there.
Before, we go there, do you think, if the guy was black that it would have had the same outcome?
BlueAlpha1 said:
You want to compare OJ Simpson who got off on killing two people with the race card and Scott Peterson who is facing the death penalty for killing one person and say there is not a racial double-standard?
OJ Simpson has no problem in the woman department, why would I care about him in this discussion? He had a white wife. Must have felt he made it.
[quote="BlueAlpha1]
Like you did before when you asserted that all 326 whites killed were clean and justified? Hypocrisy defined.
My friend, you're not doing well so far[/QUOTE]
I asserted that 326 whites were not killed because they approached and flirted with a woman, not that they were cleaned and justified. This thread is about social and sexual dynamics between men and women and society and how police deal with these dynamics. I am not making this into a race issue beyond approaching women, flirting, and yes, groping.