Sorry Asmodeus but there is absolutely no reason a middle aged woman would be on a PUA site other than to cause trouble for men. PUA tactics are used AGAINST women to gain advantage. If she wants to have a logical conversation, she would be out on a date with someone, there is something strange about a woman that comes here and has hundreds of posts. If you look at EyeB/Sho/WildFyre they all come here to push an agenda, LYD is doing the same albeit from a slightly different angle and disarming you at the same time as you rush to defender her (this is not the first time). [9 Followers] indicates exactly the white knight, pandering male, orbiting woman's worship attitude that so many posters have. She engages your natural defenses and at the same time subtly pushes the woman's rights agenda...
If LYD is the woman she says she is, loves to put a man first etc etc, then she would not be sitting on the net, staring into a forum full of men, she would be out there with said man. Goes double for EyeB, likely these are huffington post/loveshack punters as 99% of what they post is fluff and bs. Grewd is another white knight and if you check out what she/he posts a lot of it is knightly defense and lynch mobbing. Pre-purge the only people to do this were Fatal Gay and Jaylan. Post, it seems as though that number has grown exponentially and now 70% of this forum subscribes to male white knighting/SJW bs with most men hanging off the words of posters with 0 real world 'pick up' experience. Of course women are going to take a woman's side and fully expect you to do the same 'unquestionably' as was indicated in previous posts, they even use shaming tactics to do it.
Danger has the most reasonable point of view. The definition of rape has morphed to include "When I feel like it". Of course the judge believed the woman right away and all 13 were in agreement despite the gapping flaws of the case. We live in a feminist society, totally slanted against men and men's rights, one that openly encourages lynching based on 'feels'. The case requires more investigation beyond what has been presented. Applying Game theory, which very few regular people even know exists, we know that woman often lie, are irresponsible and put themselves into said position knowingly then use regret later to make rape accusations. An ex-gf I dated even did this, she emailed me several YEARS after and said "You kind of raped me, didn't you?" because I had dumped her abruptly. In North America, even this would have resulted in a court case.
Rapists are violent offenders, not university students. Go look down your street at the drug gangs, who frequently use Real Rape to get there way, how many of those 'rapists' are reported and make the news versus 'campus rape' cases.
Lets look at another newsworthy case that I followed: Rateh Parsons
The girl committed suicide 2 years AFTER the alleged rape. Now most people were out calling for blood at the first articles release. The subsequent articles were slanted heavily in favor of Rateh and the entire case had been twice proven by authorities to find no conclusive evidence. A teen girl went to a party, got fall down drunk and had sex with a group of young popular boys. They took a picture of her. The articles then stated that the boys had killed her by rape and bullying and made it unclear whether she had killed herself and for what reason.
The articles left out that the mother and best friend tried twice to pull her out of the house and she told them both to 'take a hike' while she went in to lay with her 'rapists'. Later that week the photo made the rounds at the local school and she was teased. Upon regretting the situation, her mother COACHED her to claim rape (all of this is in obscure and factual news articles). She then tried to claim the boys raped her. An investigation was done with a special rape unit and the evidence was found to be inconclusive. A year later she had moved out and was living with a boyfriend on the far side of town. They broke up and she killed herself. The mother who could not accept responsibility for her sh1tty parenting, went to several special interest (feminist) groups and put pressure on (Stephen Harper) our ex prime minister and the government to re-open the case. Feminists were parading in the streets and calling for blood. Then new 'cyber-bullying' laws were put into place and the boys were retroactively charged and held accountable for Rateh's semi-related suicide. Rape was redefined, and now we have the 'rape culture' epidemic. This is what sparked the government to push the Canadian 'get them while their young' sex-ed curriculum, and allowed the government to piggy back LGBT bullying with it. Her mother was the biggest proponent of said law and movement... all based on 'feels' and white knighting. There are now countless 'rape' cases that are accepted along the basis of hurt feelings, ruined reputations and regretted sex. I have no doubt the judge threw the book at this man, prior cases have paved the way for it.
At one point one of the boy's fathers edited a Wikipedia article claiming that the boys were rapists when it was found to be untrue. They were busted on distributing 'child porn' because one of the boys was 18 at the time. There was suddenly a huge out-cry about this, the boy's father was found to be a serving soldier and was HEAVILY reprimanded. Because they couldn't find a way to sentence this soldier to jail, they instead found a way legally to find him guilty of using the DOD's computers to edit the wiki case, basically he was found guilty of using company resources and time for personal use. This is the extent SJWs will go to ruin someone's life that is not congruent with their 'feels'. This soldier was guilty of NOTHING other than being related to one of the boys and stating the facts. Thousands of soldiers use company computers for personal matters, but since they couldn't get him on anything else, they made sure they got him for that, then heavily publicized the case. Now the boys are registered sex offenders and their lives will likely be ruined....
At one point the hacker group Anonymous was even involved.
If you are wondering why I have an interest in this case, I moonlight as a gumshoe.
http://www.cbc.ca/ns/features/rehtaeh-parsons/
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-...in-court-to-face-child-porn-charges-1.1320435