narcissist said:Are you guys really surprised by this?
I mean, this to me is not surprising whatsoever. It just further solidifies my belief that the number one priority in life is "YOU"
It has always been the case (since the dawn of mankind) that women have taken advantage of their sexual power over men. It is a biological and evolutionary fact that women get to reside in the lofty and comfortable position of choosing their mate, while men have to increase their chances by seducing many mates. So this poem to me is just a reflection of the sexual strategy women have occupied for hundreds of thousands of years. They sit back and pick and choose the best choice out of the bunch based off of looks, social status, wealth (accumulation of resources), power etc to ensure their genetics have the best chance of being propagated. Its written in their biological constituency. Its evolutionary my friend. There is no way around it, other than to play the evolutionary game of becoming the best choice. OR opt out of the game. To analyze it as "disgusting" or "horrible" is to scoff at the mechanism's and strategies that guided human evolution. Accept it or opt out of the evolutionary game of cat and mouse.
And that is the brilliance of human evolution. We can individually choose to bypass the evolutionary imperative/goal (propagating genes through production of offspring). We can now opt to fulfill an EXISTENTIAL purpose, instead. We can say FVCK chasing women and their dumb bullsh*t. We can choose to live our lives for OURSELVES! We can choose to reach OUR POTENTIAL for our OWN satisfaction! By becoming the most intelligent we can become. By becoming as physically healthy as we can become. By accumulating as many degrees as we possibly can. By mastering as many hobbies as we possibly can. By becoming a man above all others, and by living every single day striving to surpass who we were the day before! That in my opinion is the ultimate freedom.
I don't see why red pill isn't filled to the brim with evolutionary interpretations of women. The mechanisms discovered by science behind human sexual selection is extremely similar to the anecdotal evidence that backs up red-pill. It is just more scientifically valid and reliable, and thus in my opinion more believable. I personally love to tie in evolution with red-pill, because the mechanisms behind evolution do not "care" about the feelings of human beings or other animals, it only "cares" about passing on genetics. This seems to me to be a good reflection of the evolutionary mechanism of human sexual selection. It disregards feelings and is impartial. It only wants the most adaptive genetics to a certain environment to pass on and thus does not give a sh*t whether all the less successful organisms die off, which is exactly what happens. This is how the mechanism of sexual selection works. If you are NOT adaptive and find a way to seduce women, you WILL NOT pass on your genetics and your genetic lineage will die off. Its the harsh reality of existing as a biological organism. But "harsh" is only subjective. People think its harsh because of two reasons. 1) because they were taught in religion about soul mates and that love prevails (even though love is also an evolutionary mechanism used for efficient offspring rearing), and that women wont cheat if they find a better mate, blah blah blah. Not true, its propagating disney ideologies and expectations about a natural world that is impartial and harsh. 2) because people don't understand that they can bypass the evolutionary imperative and fulfill an existential imperative instead.MillionBillionaire said:
Me as well hahaZion said:
I never understood stupid people who care about passing genes.They are ultimate morons.Even if you have child , you child may still die before passing genes.Even if pass who gives fvck? If you are dead you are dead.Its all about EGO.Have children for enjoyment or help not for genes.They live in fear omfg i die childless, im loser.narcissist said:
Chicks trolling on FB, not much differently from when I see guys troll about women making sammiches, staying in the kitchen, or trading her in for a new version.Zion said:
JohnyTheArrow said:
narcissist said:
To all your posts in this thread.Don't always be the one putting yourself out for her. Don't always be the one putting all the effort and work into the relationship. Let her, and expect her, to treat you as well as you treat her, and to improve the quality of your life.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
I mentioned to my girlfriend that if we get married I want a pre-nup. She said "okay that's cool, if that's what you want I'll sign it." Thought women fought this type of stuff more with the irrational "love means more than money"BlueAlpha1 said:
PipeDope said:
