Sheesh, I try not to comment on your posts, but yall make it so interesting that I must...
By Deep Dish:
Ah, the blackhole. Basking in man's energy; his ambitions, his lifeforce, his money, his social status; draining him of life; then kicking him to the curb when she, invariably, inevitably, gets bored. Pook noted how women 'miraculously' pick up a man's interests; if a man is reading a book, she gets herself a copy; if the man is into travel and art, so the woman follows. Over a lifetime, she calls this 'learning about yourself', but at expense of all those past guys.
Man’s greatest motivation is pleasing women; women’s greatest motivation...is pleasing herself.
What is the reality of so-called ‘female vampirism’?
It is a woman that gets sex without offering support. When a man gets regular sex, everything is covered for him. The motivation goes
out the window. The woman
herself becomes the motivator now.
Everything a guy does revolves around pleasing women, like it...or not.
If a woman does not support a man to improve his lot in life, she is worthless. If she does not motivate, she is sucking the life out of him. A better analogy would be that she is just letting it
drain out of him.
But the females exclaim:
"Yeah, but it is not the women’s job to support the weak male ego!"
You women do not even know what ego in this context even
means! It is not the same for a woman.
A woman does not define herself by her skills, independence, and character. A man DOES.
What will
she do when her skills become obselete? What will
she do when she loses her job and is unable to be independent anymore? What will
she do when she fails in interactions because of lack of character?
Easy. Go on a diet, get a tan, get her hair and nails done, put on makeup and some tight clothes, and go find a rich guy!
She doesn't feel
bad about what happened to her. She might feel a little bad, but the only thing I think that would compare would be if she realized that her sexuality is not
able to get a guy to support her. Because, when it gets down and dirty, THAT is how females define themselves.
If they DID define themselves by thier jobs, etc. they would NEVER have needed a "feminist revolution" because they never would have let themselves sink down far enough to even NEED it!
What will the man do when all these things happen to him? Lose his wife, his kids, and end up living on the street; and with his dignity GONE, he has hit bottom.
Then there is nowhere else to go but up.
But I am NOT complaining here. It is simply a tradeoff. Let’s take a man that is real ugly or something. No big deal, he can just get a good job with lots of money and find some hot chick to bang somewhere. (Look at rock stars…) Women really can’t do the same thing.
She is getting SEXUAL support by him getting off with her (and she also feeds of his life), but she provides no LIFE support by encouragements.
I think a good analogy for these she-devils (female vamps) is a man that marries a woman and NEVER has sex with her!
Think about THAT one ladies!
It is a two sided story. The man provides sexual encouragement for the weak female sexual ego, so she can get pregnant; and the women provides emotional encouragement so the man has the confidence to conquer the world.
The man provides a LIFE for the female to take part in while the female provides SEX for the man to take part in.
Feminist complain that women are not as successful as guys, but I think that guys have more motivation to become successful. A jobless man will ALWAYS be considered a loser to women, while men could care less about a woman’s job. A guy with the better job is the better catch.
We don't complain to women that they are prettier than us, do we?
A man derives his sexual worth from the woman, and the woman derives her ‘life’ worth from the man. They SHOULD cultivate it accordingly.
But the feminists are so stupid. They have cultivated this attitude of “I don’t owe men sh*t, they should pamper ME!” and make a woman feel bad when she encourages her man.
I laugh when I hear a girl complain about how a guy was a bad lay. I ask them "Well, why not SHOW him how to do it RIGHT and then you won't have to whine about it? Why not encourage him to become better instead of b*tch about it behind his back?"
And if I am feeling saucy, I tell them: "Why not ACT the part of the woman!? You act all b*tchy and nasty, and then wonder why he doesn't 'take' you? Duh?"
Even the women lose when they just sit back and think that they have the puzzy path to everything gold in this world.
Why do you think most women want strong AND vunerable? They are a little co-dependent (sheesh, even the dumb sh*t psychologist have a negative term for natural human empathy!) but it is becoming ‘uncool’ to show it.
It is like all of us guys saying, “Sex drains the precious life-energy from us (those damn female vampires)! Let us never have sex ever, except for when we have to make babies!”
By Pook:
His life is in danger! Why is this ancient tome of wisdom saying such a thing?
"It is speaking of spiritual life, of his soul."
Yes but no! Just look around for validation. I see a fleet of young men, obviously gone the path that above foolish male did, and have their lives sucked from them. They lose their ambition. They just sit about, drowning in sensuality. They have become merely boy-toys. There is no Man in them.
Hush! Don’t tell that to a crazy religious person! They actually think the metaphors are REAL!
Anyway, that astounds me. I also see that fleet of young men, and I wonder at the women. I wonder why they are not saying “get a better job, you can do it!” or “go back to school, you can do it!”
When I look at a lot of successful people, I see that they had women encouraging them or driving them in some way.
I guess they will just need to have kids. Having kids really lights a fire under a woman’s ass, so she becomes successful even IF the boyfriend/husband/baby’s father is a complete loser. I think having kids is the FEMALE transmutation.
Rather than looking at things in a 'bad girl' or 'good girl' frame, it might be more helpful to look at it in a 'GIVING' or 'NONGIVING' frame.
For example, the 'NONGIVING' girl only sees you as a prop, as a boytoy, as an ATM card. This type of girl is all about HER, of what SHE can get for HERSELF. As a mother, she sees her children as merely agents to give her 'motherly feelings'. She doesn't truly GIVE her life for them or for the husband.
The GIVING girl tends to be the sweet one. She sees children not as a bangle to give her more status to this world or 'motherly feelings', but as someone to sacrifice and invest her life within. She even has that attitude towards you. She is the ideal wife and mother.
Rather than 'good' or 'bad' girl, I think the 'giving' and 'nongiving' frame is more illuminating.
Yup.
Some of these people who make theories on women used DAMAGED women as the example. Saying women wan’t status, money, etc.
The kind of girl that straight up asks you how much money you make, and gets on her high horse and orders you around is the kind that you DON’T want no matter HOW hot she is.
But with EVERY woman I come across, they ALL say, "I understand men" (you won't find a male who will say such a thing about women with any real confidence). They think they know how to CONTROL men, how to make 'men happy'. But they are SO VAIN and SO WRONG it is laughable.
They probably say this because all through thier lives thier guy friends tell them just what a guy wants.
Of course asking people things that they don't know, is always stupid. Men may say sex, sex, sex keeps them happy, but these women are just like the nice guys in that they LISTEN and then think they have it all figured out…UNTIL they find a guy that they want to marry. (Then they realise that thier understanding is INCOMPLETE.) Women lose also in this sex-dumb age. (Because not many women can still get guys at 50, their younger counterparts see to THAT!)
Yeah, it is funny. If they know so much about men, and are in complete control, then why all the divorces? Who’s fault would it be? If the relationship goes good, the woman takes credit, if it goes bad, it is the man’s fault.
We can’t win!
It's time for the world to have a TRUE Sexual Revolution!
First, we have to find out that we are not as smart as we presume. With science and all, most people think WAY to literally. Nobody understands intangibles anymore. They THINK they do, but they just understand it because they LABELED it that. (In job interviews they even try to QUANTIFY it! As if!)
Either get past the extreme 'logical thinking', or forever hear:
"Bullsh*t dude, it's all about the puzzy!"
