Would You Bang A 15, 16, or 17 Yr Old?

Francisco d'Anconia

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 10, 2003
Messages
15,502
Reaction score
63
Location
Galt's Gulch
DJDamage said:
Let me play the devil's advocate here...
So what's your advocacy for a 30+ year old guy who chooses to bed girls as young as 15?

I don't know why you guys keep trying to corrupt the thread by changing the physical time of events or the age of the guy. Why can't you guys speak toward viable reason for a 30+ year old man in the 21st century (in America) trying to bed children as young as 15 years old? What does this say about guys who would take advantage of the naivete of children? This is why they are called predators.
 

belividere

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
956
Reaction score
5
Age
45
Most likely I would not have sex with a girl who is under 20. I typically prefer women who look like their in there middle 20's. Very rarely do I find many girls under 20 who I think are all that great looking.

With that said I did date a 19 yr. old last year for a few months. She acted at the least a few years older so I had no problems with it. Of course that was only at first and then after awhile the truth surfaced and she had the emotionally maturity of a 19 yr old. Yeah I'll stick with the older girls who can handle a good romp and then not expect a ring after a month.
 

KillaCam

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 26, 2005
Messages
770
Reaction score
3
I'm nearly 18, and personally, I wouldn't go near a 15 year old. Even now I notice the difference between a 15 year old and a 17/18/19 year old.

It's not really a question of legalities, it's a question of ethics.
 

Scrumtulescence

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 23, 2004
Messages
948
Reaction score
3
Age
43
Location
Inyurvij Eina
Francisco d'Anconia said:
Under what circumstances is it natural? And what about the guys who don't, is there something wrong with them?
You want an explanation for why it's natural or instinctual for a man of any age to "check out" a girl with a sexually matured body? Are you that dense?
 

Randomer

Don Juan
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
133
Reaction score
3
thats some crazy **** wow... im only 19 and i wouldn't even mess with a 15 yo. 16 maybe... if it was legal... and she was really developed, but 17 is the realistic cutoff for me
 

pooparu

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Messages
412
Reaction score
10
Location
In a land called **** it.
I've gotta agree with Scrum, either you guys don't live in major cities (NYC/MIAMI/LA etc), or the girls from 15-17 around you all look young as ****, but this is coming from a guy who is 16 and I see *****es that look 19 when they are 14 around here and 17 year old *****es that look like they are thirteen.

Yep. It's a good thing. But the world is definetly not a safe place for little kiddies to be out in the city and having 35 - 40 year olds 50 year olds??? to be checking out their asses in a lusting way. If you really think that is natural, and okay, you really are fkced in the head.
You're dumb. I'm not going to sugar coat it. You're a dumb guy. IF you can honestly stand her and say that a girl that has an incredible body that you don't even KNOW is 15 you wouldn't look at, then it IS NOT NATURAL. I can almost guarantee you that in some time if you live outside of hickville usa, you have looked at not only like a 16 or 15 year old, but possibly even a 13 year old not even realizing how old she is. It's not possible to tell everything nowadays, and trsut me I've got friends that beat out many model's bodies who are anywhere from15-17.

This guy is talking about includes 15 and 16 year olds, don't try to dissuade things by omitting that fact. And if don't realize it, sex with minors is predatory no matter if it was consensual or not; that's why there are laws. These laws are to protect impressionable minors who can easily be taken advantage of by libido driven, dirty old men who choose not to play with women their own age.
I think you missed it the three times he said if it was legal. Also, I'm going with another poster and gonna try to elaboarte, if you omit the word old, you actually have a more accurate statement. Most guys start losing their libido around that age, guy sare out their sexual peak, urges, and most rapists are anywhere from 17-25 IIRC. Those laws are imosed in the hopes of cultivating a more christian ethics system. Whoever said it was right, there IS a reason why girls hit puberty before men, there clock is ticking. After 30 the risks of pregnancy increase, and after 35 it increases significantly. So i mean in actuality if you aimed for simply 18+ women, your gonna be getting anywhere from 18 - 26 year old women, after that alot of women seem to kind of let themselves go, but some still look good through their 30s.

So what's your advocacy for a 30+ year old guy who chooses to bed girls as young as 15?

I don't know why you guys keep trying to corrupt the thread by changing the physical time of events or the age of the guy. Why can't you guys speak toward viable reason for a 30+ year old man in the 21st century (in America) trying to bed children as young as 15 years old? What does this say about guys who would take advantage of the naivete of children? This is why they are called predators.
A girl that is 15-17 is not mentally handicapped. I think adults truly try to dwarf the mental capacity of people our age. There are girls out there at younger ages having threesomes, joining gangs, doing coke, etc etc, and to be honest (even though I support controlled drug use), I'd rather have my daughter slobing a 35 year old guys knob then bumping coke or banging out in the streets. You can make logical decisions at around 12-13, at 15-16, unless you are mentally handicapped, there should be no reason why anyone of that age can't have sex, they SHOULD be at that time, educated of the dangers, risks, protection, etc. Honestly, kids our age are not that naive, but they play the part incredibly well (and trust me, I don't know how many times I've seen adults coerced by adolescents because you somehow think that were in a stage of innocence again or something. Teenagers are some dirty, bad, nasty mother ****ers, I'm not gonna lie. The naivity thing is nearly non existant on most psychologically healthy 15-17 year old girls.

For the OP, if its legal, and its consensual, why not? I mean i'm 16 maybe my views will change, but I mean if the girl looks sexually mature, and its legal, age is a number. If the national consnet law was 16 everywhere I guarantee you we wouldn't be having this conversation about 12-14 year olds, because they don't LOOK older, that's why most states that have lower age laws then the rest of the nation start at 15-16, because *****es that age often look alto older, and they CAN make their own decisions. So I mean do you man, as long as its consensual it's not like the girls so dumb she's not gonna know what you want.
 

Create Reality

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 29, 2002
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
7
Location
California
Code:
if (x > 16 && x > ConsentAge)
{ BoomBoomBoom(); }
else
{ KeepItInYoPants(); }
 

Francisco d'Anconia

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 10, 2003
Messages
15,502
Reaction score
63
Location
Galt's Gulch
Scrumtulescence said:
You want an explanation for why it's natural or instinctual for a man of any age to "check out" a girl with a sexually matured body? Are you that dense?
Take this personally, learn to fvcking read! The post is titled "Would you BANG a 15, 16, or 17 year old," not check out (which isn't much better). It's sad that people with this mentality are capable of reproducing. What's even worse is that they'll probably go down to the schoolyard and after their kid sister's friends just because she's hit puberty and has grown a pair of tits, pathetic...

I've said it in other posts and this in itself substantiates the woman who posted in the forum that the typical guy is a slave to pvssy. These guys will twist logic and make excuses to justify taking advantage of children just to get laid. It makes you think that they can't sarge women of legal age.

It's scares me to think that you guys are probably capable of taking the information you learn from this site and use it to go after children. This lack of chacter completely degrades what this site is all about.
 

pooparu

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Messages
412
Reaction score
10
Location
In a land called **** it.
Francisco I respect your opinion and all bro but you did respond to checking out:

Dasani said:

It makes me feel bad for any girl that crosses your path whos 15 years old and u check her ass.
And then Maximus said:

Let me inform you of something. It's quite natural for a man, regardless of age to "check out," a woman even is she's 15. And it's ok. Just as look as you don't act upon those desires or do anything lewd.
And then you said:

Under what circumstances is it natural? And what about the guys who don't, is there something wrong with them?
So you WERE actually talking about checking them out, at least right there.
 

belividere

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
956
Reaction score
5
Age
45
pooparu said:
A girl that is 15-17 is not mentally handicapped. I think adults truly try to dwarf the mental capacity of people our age.
It's not trying to dwarf the mental capacity of people your age, its the actual facts that most people between 15 - 17 have no idea of what living an actual independant life are actually about.


pooparu said:
There are girls out there at younger ages having threesomes, joining gangs, doing coke, etc etc, and to be honest (even though I support controlled drug use), I'd rather have my daughter slobing a 35 year old guys knob then bumping coke or banging out in the streets. You can make logical decisions at around 12-13, at 15-16, unless you are mentally handicapped, there should be no reason why anyone of that age can't have sex, they SHOULD be at that time, educated of the dangers, risks, protection, etc. Honestly, kids our age are not that naive, but they play the part incredibly well (and trust me, I don't know how many times I've seen adults coerced by adolescents because you somehow think that were in a stage of innocence again or something. Teenagers are some dirty, bad, nasty mother ****ers, I'm not gonna lie. The naivity thing is nearly non existant on most psychologically healthy 15-17 year old girls.
So a 12-13 yr old girl is capable of making logical decisions? How many 12 - 13 yr old girls can actually afford to have a baby either physically or mentally? I know a lot of 24-27 yr old single mothers who would dispute this argument. In reality there is more to life for a teenager than either a) having sex, or b) doing hard drugs/ being a gangbanger.

It isnt about how bada$$ teenagers are it's about how stupid they are. Give it sometime and you'll realize how ridiculously easy it actually is to mind-fck a 15-17 girl into having sex with you is when your a "mature" guy.

That is all that it takes to hook up with a 15 -17 yr old who still wants a unicorn for her birthday, hasn't worked for more than a year or two in a real job, lives at home off her parents, doesn't plan beyond next year, has no bills, thinks she's mature type of little girl.

Girls do not mature faster than boys. That is complete nonsense pushed by the femnazi's to make women fell superior. How many "mature" 18 yr old little girls do you think stand a chance in life versus 18 yr old men? Girls hardly ever take the step towards independance and maturity when compared to men. Having sex does not equate to being mature, dealing with consequences and responsiblities is what does. Physical and emotional maturity are very distinct and seperated points in life.
 

KillaCam

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 26, 2005
Messages
770
Reaction score
3
There are a lot of valid points bought up in this thread, it has served a hell of a good purpose.

There is an example I want to bring up about a mate that I have been close with for a while. She's 19 now, i'm just about 18, have been mates since 16/14. She pretty much grew up going down the wrong path. At 14 she started getting into the party lifestyle, then drifting in towards the gang scene (she's black by the way, a looker too). 15 she was doing drugs and getting around with the gang prospects and leaders sexually. 16 she got pregnant to a 22 year old, and kept the baby.

Nowadays she's not in that lifestyle much anymore, but even then she's not totally clean. She loves that kid to death, but even she openly admits that life has been a struggle because of what she's done. From her mouth entirely, she's told me many times that she felt like decisions were made for her. Sure, she chose not to say no, but even at 16, 17 and up until she got her act together at 18, she was naive, she was gullible, and she got lead down paths not by her own choice, but by influence.

I don't know whether this story means much to anyone, but I just wanted to point out that I have seen, with my own 2 eyes, a girl who couldn't make her own decisions, even at 17 and 18.
 

belividere

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
956
Reaction score
5
Age
45
Killacam,

I've said it before and I'll say it again, you are wise beyond your years. I've seen too many of my female friends be influenced by external sources into doing things that they knew where dumb at the time just to fit in.

At 27 I can tell you right now if I really wanted to hook up with a young dependant 15 -17 yr old I could probably do so within an hour. All it takes is finding the one with daddy issues and a few minutes of convincing her of how "mature" I am.
 

john_1234

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jun 5, 2005
Messages
395
Reaction score
5
it's sickening when men try to bang girls who haven't reached puberty yet. but what about the underage cuties w/ tits and ass? hypothetical ? for ya: if you had the opportunity to bang an underage cutie w/ big tits/ass, and you were 100% sure no one would ever find out, would you bang her? most men would
 

Weak_Game

Don Juan
Joined
Mar 17, 2006
Messages
182
Reaction score
5
Still from a biological standpoint, a girl can conceive as young as what? 12? Her body is mature and ready to bare children. From a moral standpoint in todays society it is wrong.

Yet some south african tribes still conceive as young as 13. When girls are BIOLOGICALLY able to have children. We were not meant to live as long as 40-60-90 years old. We beat nature by keeping people alive longer.

Back through history an old mas was 30 years old. You were 18 and in your prime. Notice many kings and emporers were children. Life expantancy was short. So biologically woman were conceiving with men that were in there 20's when they were 13-14.

We beat nature, but girls bodies have not adapted to our moral ways.
 

Adone

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
806
Reaction score
2
This summer I had the chance to fùck several girls younger than me (19) so I've finally understood what is the line for me. With girls who were 3 years or less younger than me, I had no problem. With girls who were 4 years younger than me, they should look at least 16 and already have some experience. With girls 5 years younger, I had to be approached and asked to, they should look older, beautiful and be as experienced as a 18-yrs-old.

I don't care for insults, I just told you what my viewpoint is.
 

Centaurion

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2001
Messages
2,315
Reaction score
16
Location
Europe
Go back a couple of hundreds years and you'll see that it was natural for 18 year old chicks to have several kids and an established familiy. Go back even further, and it was usual to marry off 14-15 year olds.

I prefer to take Hume's approach regarding the morally good/evil.
 

KillaCam

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 26, 2005
Messages
770
Reaction score
3
Centaurion said:
Go back a couple of hundreds years and you'll see that it was natural for 18 year old chicks to have several kids and an established familiy. Go back even further, and it was usual to marry off 14-15 year olds.
Fortunately, we don't live hundreds of years ago :)
 

typical

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
1,249
Reaction score
260
Location
Auckland, New Zealand
Here in kiwi land the age of consent is like 12 but the other partner can be no more then 4 years older so a 12 year old could get it on with a 16 year old, the age of consent for any age is still 16.

Having said that I remember when I was 18 and tried to finger a 16 year old chick I could barely get my pinky in her let alone anything else. So yea man leave the underage girls alone man plenty of over 18 honeys to game.

Btw everyday there is some chick turning 18 so just wait till then or if your at uni then every semester new hot girls pop in and need to be "shown around" ............. LOL ........ make friends with the ugly ones to get to the hot ones :)
 

Scumfrog

Don Juan
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
17 is fine by me (i'm 20)
Though in Canada I believe the legal age of consent is 14 for sex.
 

Skel

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 5, 2003
Messages
1,722
Reaction score
10
Id **** anything thats legal. IM 28 and I dont give a ****. If 15 was legal Id **** it. But its not so I dont.
 
Top