Women Love Sex

[Hamurabimbi]

this is an interesting discussion. But one tfat cannot really be resolved. There are guys here who have girls eagerly climbing on & riding their dvcks to a screaming orgasm & other guys who have to munch carpet to get her in the mood for starfish sex. And everything between.
Another case of the blind men & the elephant.

 

[CornbreadFed]

this is an interesting discussion. But one tfat cannot really be resolved. There are guys here who have girls eagerly climbing on & riding their dvcks to a screaming orgasm & other guys who have to munch carpet to get her in the mood for starfish sex. And everything between.
Another case of the blind men & the elephant.

The harsh truth is that some guys are always going to have to munch carpet and settle for starfish sex.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

So why do you experts think did nature make women so they can't have orgasm through penetration? Which means for thousands of years they had mostly no orgasm.

Human females enjoy sex, most animals are only rutting for procreation. However, I was once talking with a biology professor and he told me that a likely explanation for women not being easily satisfied could have to do with getting the best seed to impregnate.

His theory was based on the mating of deer. In mating season, when the doe gets in heat, the male deer compete with each other to prove they are the most deserving of impregnating the doe.
By 'mock fighting' (no actual victims) the deer got into a hierarchy. Number one would be most powerful deer, number two the second most powerful deer and so on.
Now, the doe is ready to be impregnated and Deer 1 mounts her. He shoots his load into her and pulls out. But the doe isn't satisfied, so while deer 1 stumbles off, deer 2 mounts the doe. And maybe deer 3 as well. This ensure the strongest seed will impregnate the doe - if deer 1 happens to be infertile, deer 2's seed will do the job, and otherwise deer 3.
If, however, the doe wouldn't want to mate after mating with deer 1, and deer 1 turns out to be infertile, then there are no deer babies.

So nature makes human females less easily satisfied, so they are still horny after male 1 shoots his load and stumbles off, and the second best male can plow the female.

That was his theory on why women take so much longer to climax and men.

 

[Epicenter]

this is an interesting discussion. But one tfat cannot really be resolved. There are guys here who have girls eagerly climbing on & riding their dvcks to a screaming orgasm & other guys who have to munch carpet to get her in the mood for starfish sex. And everything between.
Another case of the blind men & the elephant.

I asked AI bing what is the evolutionary reason for the ****oris?

AI bing:
The human female ****oris is not always aroused through penetration, because it is located outside the vaginal opening and may not receive enough stimulation from the penis or other objects. However, some women may experience ****oral arousal and orgasm through penetration, depending on the size, shape and position of their ****oris, as well as the angle and depth of penetration1. The evolutionary reason for the ****oris is not fully understood, but some possible explanations are:

****oris
The ****oris is a remnant of the embryonic development, when the genital tubercle can become either a penis or a ****oris depending on the exposure to male hormones2. The ****oris and the penis share a common origin and structure, but have different functions in reproduction.
****oris
The ****oris is an adaptation for female sexual pleasure, which may increase the likelihood of mating, bonding and reproduction. The ****oris may also enhance female sexual selection, allowing women to choose partners who can satisfy them sexually.
****oris
The ****oris is a by-product of natural selection, which favored the development of the penis in males. The ****oris may not have a specific function in reproduction, but it does not harm it either. The ****oris may simply be a side effect of having a common ancestor with males.
These are some of the theories that scientists have proposed to explain the evolution of the ****oris. However, there is no definitive answer to this question, as the ****oris is a complex and mysterious organ that deserves more research and attention.

There are many threads at reddit about that topic.

https://www.reddit.com/r/offmychest/comments/qpbgsr

 

[FlexpertHamilton]

Human females enjoy sex, most animals are only rutting for procreation. However, I was once talking with a biology professor and he told me that a likely explanation for women not being easily satisfied could have to do with getting the best seed to impregnate.

His theory was based on the mating of deer. In mating season, when the doe gets in heat, the male deer compete with each other to prove they are the most deserving of impregnating the doe.
By 'mock fighting' (no actual victims) the deer got into a hierarchy. Number one would be most powerful deer, number two the second most powerful deer and so on.
Now, the doe is ready to be impregnated and Deer 1 mounts her. He shoots his load into her and pulls out. But the doe isn't satisfied, so while deer 1 stumbles off, deer 2 mounts the doe. And maybe deer 3 as well. This ensure the strongest seed will impregnate the doe - if deer 1 happens to be infertile, deer 2's seed will do the job, and otherwise deer 3.
If, however, the doe wouldn't want to mate after mating with deer 1, and deer 1 turns out to be infertile, then there are no deer babies.

So nature makes human females less easily satisfied, so they are still horny after male 1 shoots his load and stumbles off, and the second best male can plow the female.

That was his theory on why women take so much longer to climax and men.

That's really interesting, not sure how it relates to humans though. We know among primates that the size of their balls is correlated with their promiscuity. Gorillas have teeny balls but exist in harems and all the females only procreate with the top male. But chimps and bonobos are just completely wild and accordingly their balls are massive. Our balls are fairly large somewhere between gorillas and chimps relative to our body if I remember correctly. So it's not entirely clear if monogamy is hardwired into us, though some people try to say it is.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

So it's not entirely clear if monogamy is hardwired into us, though some people try to say it is.

I had a discussion about that too.
For instance, most animals have sex 'doggy style', but humans have missionary. Biologically, that would be because men and women can look each other in the eye while having sex. That would strengthen the bond, which is important as pregnancy, birth and the first few years of the growing child are a vulnerable period for the woman, who needs a mate to take care of her while she's pregnant, and to raise the vulnerable infant. If you compare that with, for instance, giraffes, they poop out their young and it has to stand and walk within minutes.

On the other hand, people used to live in tribes. If a hunter would die during the hunt, his woman and children would be protected by the tribe. Monogamy is not exactly necessary, but pregnant women need other humans around them to protect them during their vulnerable period.

 

[Gamisch]

Maybe y'all listen to Coach...

Yess"but Gamisch that's a married men". Sigh..I'll find more examples for those responders

 

[Epicenter]

Maybe y'all listen to Coach...

Yess"but Gamisch that's a married men". Sigh..I'll find more examples for those responders

Females have no nerve cells in their vag. They don't need a ding dong. They want men's service and validation.

Men are programmed to chase frigid pussies without nerve cells. It is what it is. If things would fit it would be boring. Enjoy the show.

Though there are exceptions.

 

[Gamisch]

Females have no nerve cells in their vag. They don't need a ding dong. They want men's service and validation.

Men are programmed to chase frigid pussies without nerve cells. It is what it is. If things would fit it would be boring. Enjoy the show.

Though there are exceptions.

I don't understand why everybody is so uptight about this. It actually changes your view on women for the better. The better you understand what's going on the better you'll be able to separate yourself from the rest of these chumps.

If you happen to meet a nympho (what apparently ALL of the members encountered, all of the exes were nymphomaniac LOL) you can always fall back to your "normal" train of thought that "women love sex".

But as SOON as you encounter one who makes it slighty difficult you kmow immediately she's in it for something else.

I can't count the amount of times I personally, and many many men I've known fell for the thirst trap of THINKING a beautiful woman wanted to sleep with me/them for evah evah. Only to end up in a either a dead bedroom, or getting cucked /cheated on. The sex lured us in and made us INVEST ,and as I said before: almost no man just walks away from his investment.

Take this knowledge at face value: use it to your benefit. Don't be a naive fool like 90% of the normal AFCs.

 

[Epicenter]

I don't understand why everybody is so uptight about this. It actually changes your view on women for the better. The better you understand what's going on the better you'll be able to separate yourself from the rest of these chumps.

If you happen to meet a nympho (what apparently ALL of the members encountered, all of the exes were nymphomaniac LOL) you can always fall back to your "normal" train of thought that "women love sex".

But as SOON as you encounter one who makes it slighty difficult you kmow immediately she's in it for something else.

I can't count the amount of times I personally, and many many men I've known fell for the thirst trap of THINKING a beautiful woman wanted to sleep with me/them for evah evah. Only to end up in a either a dead bedroom, or getting cucked /cheated on. The sex lured us in and made us INVEST ,and as I said before: almost no man just walks away from his investment.

Take this knowledge at face value: use it to your benefit. Don't be a naive fool like 90% of the normal AFCs.

Because getting validation from women keeps most men alife. It gives a sense of meaning. On the other hand if women don't care about men and sex why bother? The selling point of PUA was you can use methods to make her horney for you. Well if that is not the case why should I invest at all guys might ask. The answer is your biology pushes to invest. That sounds really pathetic. That is why most guys here get silent about this topic.

Part of the chase is to have bragging rights but how can you brag for dead vags? You are in this game partly for ego but it kills the ego if you have no chance in the first place because the vags are dead. lol.

You have to find ways to dance with the dead vags anyway. It might a bit feel like corps phucking but it is what it is.

Well you still have porn, Philippines, Latin America.

 

[JusSayin]

The way Chase texts here https://www.girlschase.com/ways-to-text-a-girl

seems rather odd

I mean, the idea is good, but doesn't it seem like his texts are a bit too "soft"? Would Di Caprio text like that?
They seem too accomodating and indecisive. And the pictures of women look fake as well.

And of course women love sex with attractive men not normies. Why are we even discussing it? Is this a surprise to you? Chase is honest saying thats the case.

First rule of the game is to be attractive.
Second rule is to have money / status.
Third rule is to maximize your charisma / personality to get maximum amount of ass intake possible

 

[Bigpapa]

Females have no nerve cells in their vag. They don't need a ding dong. They want men's service and validation.

Men are programmed to chase frigid pussies without nerve cells. It is what it is. If things would fit it would be boring. Enjoy the show.

Though there are exceptions.

How do you explain the g-spot inside the vagina then?

If you can’t make a woman c8m vaginally, it is ok others can

And yeah, the g-spot is only a couple of cms inside the vagina so anyone who does not have a micro penis can stimulate it with their penis. So it is not a matter of having necessarily a male porn star penis to make a woman ***

 

[Bigpapa]

The way Chase texts here https://www.girlschase.com/ways-to-text-a-girl

seems rather odd

I mean, the idea is good, but doesn't it seem like his texts are a bit too "soft"? Would Di Caprio text like that?
They seem too accomodating and indecisive. And the pictures of women look fake as well.

And of course women love sex with attractive men not normies. Why are we even discussing it? Is this a surprise to you? Chase is honest saying thats the case.

First rule of the game is to be attractive.
Second rule is to have money / status.
Third rule is to maximize your charisma / personality to get maximum amount of ass intake possible

What”s your experience with women in order to have an opinion in this matter?

If you are not experienced is better to try it out for a while and see if it goes anywhere, then try other ways of messaging a girl, and then draw a conclusion of which one works best

 

[JusSayin]

What”s your experience with women in order to have an opinion in this matter?

I had about 14 lays and 3 ltrs

 

[Bigpapa]

I had about 14 lays and 3 ltrs

So? Do you think you are an experienced guy with women only because you had 14 lays and 3 ltrs?

Numbers alone don’t mean sh1t, a guy if he is not retarded can easily bang a lot of ugly women . Would that make him an experienced guy?

Most likely not even in sex because when bang uglies you do not feel like putting the effort into banging them good to begin with

 

[Epicenter]

How do you explain the g-spot inside the vagina then?

If you can’t make a woman c8m vaginally, it is ok others can

And yeah, the g-spot is only a couple of cms inside the vagina so anyone who does not have a micro penis can stimulate it with their penis. So it is not a matter of having necessarily a male porn star penis to make a woman ***

How do you know that most women have a g-spot?

 

[JusSayin]

So? Do you think you are an experienced guy with women only because you had 14 lays and 3 ltrs?

No, never claimed I was. I said Chase's texts seemed rather odd, that's all. Feel free to quote me where I said I'm considered an expert. If anything, I'm here to learn and improve my game.

Numbers alone don’t mean sh1t, a guy if he is not retarded can easily bang a lot of ugly women . Would that make him an experienced guy?

Of course not. Most women I have banged were in 5-7 range, which is acceptable, but nothing extraordinary.

Another text he sent girls. Read it. Too wordy, too emotional, too friendly. Is this how alpha pu$$sy slayer talks?

Who the f talks like this?

 

[Bigpapa]

How do you know that most women have a g-spot?

The same way you know the earth is not flat, plenty of medical researches around the g-spot

If you think the world is flat, either you do your own empirical research ( walking till you will fall into cosmos) either go with your conspiracy theory somewhere else

Same thing with the g-spot, put your finger inside a vagina and look for it, or even better ask a girl to guide your finger there

 

[JusSayin]

The same way you know the earth is not flat, plenty of medical researches around the g-spot

g-spot is root of cl1toris, that's all
edit: why is this forum censoring cl1toris? What kind of a cuck would put such censorship on a forum dealing with dating and sex?

 

[Epicenter]

The same way you know the earth is not flat, plenty of medical researches around the g-spot

In this case you are the flat earther. Flat earther have also their 'researchers'

Try this:

Society and culture
General skepticism
In addition to general skepticism among gynecologists, sexologists and other researchers that the G-spot exists,[3][4][5][6] a team at King's College London in late 2009 suggested that its existence is subjective. They acquired the largest sample size of women to date – 1,800 – who are pairs of twins, and found that the twins did not report a similar G-spot in their questionnaires. The research, headed by Tim Spector, documents a 15-year study of the twins, identical and non-identical. According to the researchers, if one identical twin reported having a G-spot, it was more likely that the other would too, but this pattern did not materialize.[4][9] Study co-author Andrea Burri believes: "It is rather irresponsible to claim the existence of an entity that has never been proven and pressurise women and men too."[40] She stated that one of the reasons for the research was to remove feelings of "inadequacy or underachievement" for women who feared they lacked a G-spot.[41] Researcher Beverly Whipple dismissed the findings, commenting that twins have different sexual partners and techniques, and that the study did not properly account for lesbian or bisexual women.[42]

Petra Boynton, a British scientist who has written extensively on the G-spot debate, is also concerned about the promotion of the G-spot leading women to feel "dysfunctional" if they do not experience it. "We're all different. Some women will have a certain area within the vagina which will be very sensitive, and some won't — but they won't necessarily be in the area called the G spot," she stated. "If a woman spends all her time worrying about whether she is normal, or has a G spot or not, she will focus on just one area, and ignore everything else. It's telling people that there is a single, best way to have sex, which isn't the right thing to do."[43]

Nerve endings
G-spot proponents are criticized for giving too much credence to anecdotal evidence, and for questionable investigative methods; for instance, the studies which have yielded positive evidence for a precisely located G-spot involve small participant samples.[3][5] While the existence of a greater concentration of nerve endings at the lower third (near the entrance) of the vagina is commonly cited,[1][4][8][44] some scientific examinations of vaginal wall innervation have shown no single area with a greater density of nerve endings.[4][5]

G-spot - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org