women and chaos theory

[gabrielshear]

I have been reading an interesting article about chaos theory, and you know what? it seems that women and chaos have many things in similar. This in turn both makes them predictable


Chaotic Systems are not random. They may appear to be. They have some simple defining features:

1. Chaotic systems are deterministic. This means they have something determining their behavior.

2. Chaotic systems are very sensitive are very sensitive to the initial conditions. A very slight change in the starting point can lead to enormously different outcomes. This makes the system fairly unpredictable.

3. Chaotic systems appear to be disorderly, even random. But they are not. Beneath the random behavior is a sense of order and pattern. Truly random systems are not chaotic. The orderly systems predicted by classical physics are the exceptions. In this world of order, chaos rules!

If we exploit this theory we may be able to predict women.

ps : see also my other thread entitled : how to measure a girl/women interest level

dongabriello

 

[Cheiradawg]

I am familiar with chaos theory and I can assure you it has nothing ot do with women.

 

[gabrielshear]

so what it is all about then?!!!!

 

[Cheiradawg]

Chaos theory is about chaos theory. Women are women. You can sit there and mentally masterbate your enornious brain till it hurts but you aren't really doing anything. You can say the way YOU view chaos theory is similiar to the way YOU view women, but these things are unique to YOUR mind. Reel yourself back in.

Just becuase there are these concepts in your brain that make the two things seems similiar does mean they actually are.

"If we exploit this theory we may be able to predict women." w t f is that. It will never happon. Even if it does it will be so complex no one could apply it.

Take the academic **** out of finding women. It doens't fly man trust me.

 

[karusel]

Oh no, not another science formula seeker...

I believe not everything can be scientifically predicted, humans surely can't be, at least not 100% correctly in long term, which would of course be proof to certify the theory. On the other hand, you can pretty well estimate someone's behaviour and reactions, from a basic input of 'knowing the person real well' and an extended input of 'paying attention to details' and 'feeling the vibes'. Savvy?

 

[Dee-Zy]

Originally posted by karusel
Oh no, not another science formula seeker...

My thoughts exactly - I entered this thread hoping to get some interesting intelligent insight although is was theory.


I want my 120 seconds of my life back!!!

 

[WaterTiger]

Predict women?

(Sigh!) Foolish, foolish child! The very essence of chaos is to be unpredictable. If you develop a theory to predict it, you'll disrupt the entire Time/Space Continum and reality will vanish in a POOF of logic. But by then, we girls will change all the rules and you'll have to start all over again.


The answer is "42".

 

[Raptured Phoenix]

As soon as you stop evaluating and start defining, thats when you start failing.


There is not a set rule for anything...if there is...the rule is "keep getting information."