Woman plans to marry her father after two years of dating

[Stagger Lee]

I wonder what this young girl looks like. I'm thinking she can't be hot, but you never know. They'd only been reunited a week and started having sex and been together 2 years. It's hard to figure.

A teenager has revealed in an interview that she plans to marry her father and have children after dating for two years.

The unnamed 18-year-old revealed in an interview with New York Magazine her romantic relationship of almost two years with her biological father after being estranged from him for 12 years.

In the interview, the girl also said the two also plan on having children.

The teenager said her father reached out to her on Facebook when she was in high school and soon after, she went to stay with him for a week.

After the week together, the 18-year-old said they had sex and then started dating.

"Everyone on my mom’s side of the family sees us as father and daughter," she told the magazine. "Those who know that he’s my dad, and that we are engaged, include my father’s parents (they can see we are happy together and they can’t wait for us to have babies — they treat us just like any other couple), the woman we live with, and my best friend."

After the wedding, the woman says they plan to move to New Jersey where adult incest is legal.

 

[Jaylan]

I saw this on various websites today. Rightfully so, everyone is condemning this as fvking gross and weird. What kind of dad does this? Jeezus Christ. This is just wrong. Unsurprising that this girl had emotional issues and depression growing up. In comes the estranged father to wield influence on an immature kid.

 

[Stagger Lee]

It's wrong, but not as wrong as gay marriage and a lot of people now support that. So they don't have a leg to stand on to judge.

I noticed you condemn the dad, but don't say anything about the daughter like the feminist and probably female that you are. And don't say cuz only 16, 17 or 18 years old like you did.

 

[Jaylan]

It's wrong, but not as wrong as gay marriage and a lot of people now support that. So they don't have a leg to stand on to judge.

I noticed you condemn the dad, but don't say anything about the daughter like the feminist and probably female that you are. And don't say cuz only 16, 17 or 18 years old like you did.

smh. Create a thread about gay marriage if you wanna really b!tch about that.

Btw, gay marriage is about 2 consenting adults (who are NOT family members) being allowed to marry, regardless of gender.

Thats A LOT different from incest, and some weird dad dating his teenage daughter for 2 years and fvking her. And why should I take time to condemn the daughter? She's a damn kid. She was 15 when this so called dad came back into her life and then started dating her soon after. She's dealt with depression and other emotional issues...so its clear she's been manipulated to some extent. Use critical thinking and stop the bs flaming.

I am going to bash the adult parent in this situation. If a mom groomed her 15 yr old son for marriage when he turned 18, id be bashing her just the same. Why would I place so much focus on a teenage kid with emotional issues and a broken-home upbringing?

EDIT - Its obvious in certain topics on this site, which men dont have daughters or younger female relatives that they helped raise. If you did, you wouldnt spin this discussion onto wanting to bash the young teen that was manipulated by their damn parent, and then derailing discussion onto gay marriage. Consenting adults wanting to marry has nothing to do with some loser father coming back into his kids life only to fvk his own kid and groom her to be his wife.

 

[speed dawg]

Gaylan 20 years from now you and the flower brigade will be championing gay incest civil rights. Maybe even bestiality rights. For the horse.

 

[( . )( . )]

Thats A LOT different from incest, and some weird dad dating his teenage daughter for 2 years and fvking her.

No it's not. Sodomy or more succinctly the Wests current obsession and glorification of sodomy is just another flavor of the above degeneracy.

According to statistics sodomites account for 61% of all new HIV infections.
75% of sodomites have had more than a hundred sex partners and nearly a third have had more than a thousand.

I estimate I've had approximately 3,000 men up my butt ... I estimate that I went to the baths at least once a week, sometimes twice, and that each time I went I had a minimum of four patners ... I also racked up about three men a week for five years at the Christopher Steet bookstore ...Then of course there was the MineShaft; the orgies; the 55th Street Playhouse; the International Stud backroom ...

Let me present my own history of STDs. From 1973, when I came out, to 1975, I only got mononucloeosis and non-specific urethritis, or NSU. In 1975, I got my first case of gonorrhea. Not bad, I thought. I'd had maybe 200 different partners, and I'd only gotten the clap twice. But then, moving from Boston to New York City, it all began to snowball.

First came hepatitis A in '76 and more gonorrhea and NSU. In 1977, I was diagnosed with amebiasis, an intestinal parasite, hepatitis B, more gonorrhea, and NSU. In 1978, more amebiasis and my first case of shigella, and of course, more gonorrhea. Then in 1979, hepatitis yet a third time, this time non-A, non-B, more intestinal parasites, adding giardia this time, and an anal fissure as well as my first case of syphilis ... By 1981, I got some combination of STDs each and every time I had sex ...

At age twenty-seven I've had: gonorrhea, syphillis, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and hepatitis non-A, non-B; intestinal parasites including amebiasis, e. historicia, shigella, giardia; herpes simplex types one and two; venereal warts, mononucleosis, cytomegalovirus, and now cryptosporodiosis, for which there is no known cure.

http://www.2blowhards.com/archives/2007/02/aids_and_immune.html

In other words societal decay is societal decay is societal decay.

 

[Jaylan]

No it's not. Sodomy or more succinctly the Wests current obsession and glorification of sodomy is just another flavor of the above degeneracy.

According to statistics sodomites account for 61% of all new HIV infections.
75% of sodomites have had more than a hundred sex partners and nearly a third have had more than a thousand.



http://www.2blowhards.com/archives/2007/02/aids_and_immune.html

In other words societal decay is societal decay is societal decay.

Why so focused on gay men? Seriously I wanna know why dudes like you obsess over gay men and homosexuals getting rights. Why does it bother you if its not your personal life? Why deny someone else liberty?

You know half of the LGBT community is female right? So its pretty stupid how those of you against homosexuals waste much of your time focusing so much on the males. Rather off. The lesbians though, they are not sodomizing anyone, and women who only have sex with women have amongst the lowest rate of STDs. Do the research and see its a fact that lesbians have the lowest rate of STDs.

So the problem here isnt sodomy. The STD problem has to do with men being more reckless and indiscriminate than women when it comes to sex. Gay men remove the cautious attitude of women out of the equation.

 

[( . )( . )]

Why so focused on gay men? Seriously I wanna know why dudes like you obsess over gay men and homosexuals getting rights.

The hell? I was replying to your post regarding faggots but nice try with the bait and switcheroo.

So the problem here isnt sodomy.

Like I said gaylan, sodomy and the Wests current love of all things faggotry is just one (sh!t) flavor of degeneracy pushed by sh!tlibs, your faux shock and attempt to separate this case of incest from the "good" and "approved" forms of degeneracy is neither here nor there. If leftoid media told you retards that fvcking your own children is the new cool (give it a few years) you'd be campaigning just as hard as you do for diseased pillow biters.

 

[Jaylan]

The hell? I was replying to your post regarding faggots but nice try with the bait and switcheroo.

I didnt originally bring up gays. You lot always do. This thread was not about gays, and OP tried to steer it that way.

Tell me why you wanna limit the liberty of law abiding citizens when their personal lives have nothing to do with you? Its funny how you right wingers throw liberty and rights out of the window when it comes to homosexual folk. Yet get all bent out of shape when you feel your own liberty and rights are at risk. You cannot have it both ways. Either we all have rights, or you set precedent for the government doing some shady crap.

I imagine guys like you will lose your mind if the US Supreme Court ends up legalizing gay marriage nation wide this month. Its already legal in 36 of 50 states...so it doesnt really matter much anymore.

Like I said gaylan, sodomy and the Wests current love of all things faggotry is just one (sh!t) flavor of degeneracy pushed by sh!tlibs, your faux shock and attempt to separate this case of incest from the "good" and "approved" forms of degeneracy is neither here nor there. If leftoid media told you retards that fvcking your own children is the new cool (give it a few years) you'd be campaigning just as hard as you do for diseased pillow biters.

Dude...respond directly to my previous post.

Half of all homosexuals are females who do not engage in sodomy, and lesbians have the lowest rate of STDs amongst all orientations. This is due to women being less risky and promiscuous when compared to men as it pertains to sex. Gay men dont have to deal with female "anti-slut defense" hence higher rates of STDs.

Is it any surprise that STDs have risen for females who sleep with men ever since the sexual revolution when hetero and bisexual women started being more promiscuous? I think not.

That said...with half of lgbt being women...and with lesbians having the lowest rates of STDs...why do you and others obsessively focus on gay men and butt sex? You focus on a small percentage of the population, nevermind ignoring a large proportion of that small community.

 

[( . )( . )]

I didnt originally bring up gays.

That's irrelevant. I was replying to your faggot post.

Tell me why you wanna limit the liberty

We still pretending faggot marriage is all about "liberty" and the sanctity and morality of what marriage represents?

A subculture of dysfunctional and mentally stunted degenerates who thrive on drama and promiscuity could give a fvck about marriage. It's about them wanting their slice of gubmint cheese and to stick it to the "breeders".

Half of all homosexuals are females who do not engage in sodomy

You're right they tend to engage more in raising statistically dysfunctional adults when they get the urge to complete the "just like you and me" ensemble with a child accessory.

 

[Stagger Lee]

Why so focused on gay men? Seriously I wanna know why dudes like you obsess over gay men and homosexuals getting rights. Why does it bother you if its not your personal life? Why deny someone else liberty?

Why are you so focused on straight men marrying a relative? Seriously I wanna know why dudes/dudettes like you obsess over straight men and heterosexuals getting rights? Why does it bother you if its not your personal life? Why deny someone else liberty?

Your hypocrisy would be outstanding but it's just par for the course with a liberal.

 

[Jaylan]

Why are you so focused on straight men marrying a relative? Seriously I wanna know why dudes/dudettes like you obsess over straight men and heterosexuals getting rights? Why does it bother you if its not your personal life? Why deny someone else liberty?

Your hypocrisy would be outstanding but it's just par for the course with a liberal.

Hypocrisy? Lololol did you read my first reply?

The problem here is an adult grooming his teenage daughter for sex since the age of 15.

If that father reconnected with his daughter when she was 25, I would just shrug, call them weird, and let them have at it. I know that there are family members out there in the world that do this stuff. I wouldnt care too much if a 25 year old daughter and her 45 year old dad got frisky and got married. Its an ENTIRELY different situation when an emotionally and mentally unstable 15 year old is sought out by her father for dating and sex! She's a fvking minor, and given the dynamic of their relationship, he's clearly got an emotional and mental upperhand on this kid.

But when you have a dude who abandons his kid, reconnects with her while she's still a minor, and begins dating her before she's even 16, and fvks her at 17...that is a problem. Thats predatory behavior, and in no way should be in the same discussion as homosexuals looking for marriage rights between CONSENTING ADULTS.

Thats the issue here. We are talking about rights for adults vs what some deadbeat father does to prep his daughter for sex and marriage. How can you not see the difference?

 

[Stagger Lee]

She was 16 when they reunited and had sex within a week. Hardly "grooming the daughter for sex". She's now 18 and still wants to continue the relationship. 16 is the age of consent in many states. So stop trying to put a false twist on it. Age isn't an issue here. Incest is.

It's your belief that an older male shouldn't have sexual relations with a female age 16-18 or under 21 or whatever. It's others' beliefs that people shouldn't have homosexual relations. You say homosexuals should be nobody's concern. Then it shouldn't be your concern that a heterosexual male dates a legal teen or relative.

 

[( . )( . )]

It's your belief that an older male shouldn't have sexual relations with a female age 16-18 or under 21 or whatever. It's others' beliefs that people shouldn't have homosexual relations.

To be fair to the sodomites I'm betting the average taxpayer with children wouldn't give a sh!t about sodomite relationships if they put down the bullhorn and assless chaps, fvcked off out of the schools/MSM/public toilets/government coffers and took their degeneracy back to the bedroom. Was never really that big of a deal when they were buggering each other behind close doors in the privacy of their own homes. Now they have the lay of the land and woe betide any poor bastard who doesn't blow smoke up their diseased gaping *******s and applaud their "courage"

 

[speed dawg]

Now they have the lay of the land and woe betide any poor bastard who doesn't blow smoke up their diseased gaping *******s and applaud their "courage"

:crackup:

 

[Jaylan]

She was 16 when they reunited and had sex within a week. Hardly "grooming the daughter for sex". She's now 18 and still wants to continue the relationship. 16 is the age of consent in many states. So stop trying to put a false twist on it. Age isn't an issue here. Incest is.

It's your belief that an older male shouldn't have sexual relations with a female age 16-18 or under 21 or whatever. It's others' beliefs that people shouldn't have homosexual relations. You say homosexuals should be nobody's concern. Then it shouldn't be your concern that a heterosexual male dates a legal teen or relative.

Keep comparing apples to oranges. The stories Ive read on this say she was 15 when he came back into her life and started contacting her. Either way, the dude was screwing a minor that's his daughter. For you to try to make this simply about older men dating younger women is idiotic.

Its about a much older man making moves on a girl who was a minor, that's also his daughter, who also has emotional and mental issues.

Its ignorant and asinine to compare that to homosexual relations between consenting and mature adults. I couldn't give 2 sh!ts about what consenting adults do within their relationship. However, its a fvked up thing when a grown man is trying to make moves on his daughter, especially when shes still a minor. But I guess protecting the mental and emotional sanity of broken-home minors doesn't count for sh!t.

And allow me to repeat. Had this father reconnected with this girl when she was an adult and these things happened, I would have no issue. But he chose to chase down his teenage minor daughter for sex. That's a lot different.

 

[speed dawg]

I saw this on various websites today. Rightfully so, everyone is condemning this as fvking gross and weird. What kind of dad does this? Jeezus Christ. This is just wrong. Unsurprising that this girl had emotional issues and depression growing up. In comes the estranged father to wield influence on an immature kid.

Well, I'll at least say I'm glad you think SOME forms of degeneracy are wrong, even if it's just the most f*cked up ones.

Looking at the bolded text above.....that is your problem. Why are you always worried about what other people say? You let the hivemind think for you. It radiates throughout all of your posts, the main theme of your retorts here are "Everything thinks this.....", or "Everyone on this forum thinks that.....". No one needs you to speak for them, you should try speaking for Gaylan. Then you'll earn at least a small amount of respect around here.

You are just a parasite at present.

ETA: I still say in 20 years you'll be championing bestiality rights for the farm animals.

 

[Stagger Lee]

To be fair to the sodomites I'm betting the average taxpayer with children wouldn't give a sh!t about sodomite relationships if they put down the bullhorn and assless chaps, fvcked off out of the schools/MSM/public toilets/government coffers and took their degeneracy back to the bedroom. Was never really that big of a deal when they were buggering each other behind close doors in the privacy of their own homes. Now they have the lay of the land and woe betide any poor bastard who doesn't blow smoke up their diseased gaping *******s and applaud their "courage"

I agree, but also if they'd stop spreading HIV into the heterosexual community, stop costing tax payers money to treat their health conditions and stop having others carry the burden of their insurance costs.

And allow me to repeat. Had this father reconnected with this girl when she was an adult and these things happened, I would have no issue. But he chose to chase down his teenage minor daughter for sex. That's a lot different.

I got your point from the beginning before you even made it and kept repeating it, that your problem is that an older man is with a younger woman. It's none of your business just like you say it's no one's business what homos do between two people of legal age.

 

[Jaylan]

^You clearly cannot read with comprehension.

I clearly state that if this man contacted his daughter when she was an adult, I would have had no issue with it. I then state that my issue is with him chasing down a MINOR.

And you somehow twist that into some accusation that I have an issue with age difference relationships in general? I have a problem with ADULTS DATING AND SCREWING MINORS.

I don't give a flying fvk when a younger ADULT woman or man dates an old ADULT woman or man.

I do have a problem when some predatory father seeks out his teenage daughter for sex and a relationship. Because hes a fvking adults and she was a MINOR. Just because she is an adult now does not erase what he did in the past with a MINOR.

I said it before...its obvious who on this forum has kids or younger relatives they've raised. I couldn't see any of the men raising kids on this site agreeing with the bullsh!t your trying to push here if one of their family members tried to fvk their kid.

Well, I'll at least say I'm glad you think SOME forms of degeneracy are wrong, even if it's just the most f*cked up ones.

Looking at the bolded text above.....that is your problem. Why are you always worried about what other people say? You let the hivemind think for you. It radiates throughout all of your posts, the main theme of your retorts here are "Everything thinks this.....", or "Everyone on this forum thinks that.....". No one needs you to speak for them, you should try speaking for Gaylan. Then you'll earn at least a small amount of respect around here.

You are just a parasite at present.

ETA: I still say in 20 years you'll be championing bestiality rights for the farm animals.

Christ youre an imbecile.

1. I mention that many people are rebuking the father because its a barometer of where the nation's morality is. But that doesn't mean other people's morals affect my own views. A lot of jackasses try to deny certain citizens rights based on sh!t that has nothing to do with their lives...but just because a lot of jackasses believe something does not mean they will affect my moral compass.

No hivemind thinks for me. I look at every situation like this. "Is what they do in their personal life directly impacting anyone elses life in a negative way?" If not, I believe in the liberty to live as you wish.

2. Animals cannot give consent, and have the brain of a fvking child. No way would I ever say its ok for people to screw animals. Stop with the ad hominem bullsh!te

 

[( . )( . )]

I agree, but also if they'd stop spreading HIV into the heterosexual community, stop costing tax payers money to treat their health conditions and stop having others carry the burden of their insurance costs.

And miss out on the "pozzing" craze and all the government perks and pensions that come from getting "pozzed" now that HIV is largely treatable?

http://lpix.org/519526/the most rageworthy thing i have seen for a long time.jpg

Just like you and me bigot !!:cuss: