They are AFRAID of what would happen. They would LOSE the grossly inflated sexaul market power they wield today. Guys would no longer be so eager to do them special favors, and men would be MUCH more wary about getting married. Guys would no longer be such easy targets for the deceptive games so many women play for materialistic gains. Women are SCARED of that truth getting out!!
The majority of men have been married and have had girlfriends, but many of THOSE men are blissfully unaware of how fake their mate's "love" is . Women find the majority of men unattractive, yet settle for those same guys for practical, social and cultural reasons. Paradoxically, the majority of THOSE guys have NEVER experienced what REAL love from a woman is like! Her practical needs simply outweigh her need for love, and she is under social pressure to maintain a fascade of love for her man. If only those men knew this...
Think about it. What do you think would happen to the dating/marriage game if most men realized just HOW much looks affected their true market value? What do you think would happen if those "normalfags" woke up to the fact that women can ONLY have romantic emotions toward a man who is conventionally physically attractive? If men want to regain the value in society they have lost, they MUST wake up to the redpill truth about male looks and the games women play.
Women would not be able to get away with the blatant disrespect that is so commonplace nowadays. Male knowledge of the true nature of female sexuality would make a woman's erotic capital less effective in gaining special favors and perks from men. Her erotic costs for those special favors would be much higher. They would also have to bring their standards in line with their actual market value and not be so demanding in their mate search. Men as a group would NO LONGER TOLERATE the pricey behavior women get away with so easily today. We would probably see a return to a much more traditional approach to courtship and marriage. The sexual market would be far more balanced between the sexes, like it used to be. Women very well might return to traditional ways... WILLINGLY...as they are faced with the EVEN WORSE end result of unrestricted and uncontrolled female sexuality, without a male counterbalance in place in the sexual market.
The 60s sexual revolution had a major flaw. It allowed women to get ****ed by guys WAY out of their league, but the sexual revolution did not account for the intense internal conflict many women feel between marriage and sexual attraction. Today, the Sisterhood is in the position of trying to explain away damning proof of the true nature of female sexuality. Actions speak louder than words. What men see does not match the words, and not every man is so gullible. Female sexual privaledge is only possible when men remain decieved and unaware of how female sexuality operates.
THAT is why women lie about looks! They KNOW what would happen to their privaledged position in the sexual market. Don't kid yourselves, guys. THEY KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY'RE DOING! If a women is sexually attracted to you, she reveals a part of herself that is a CLOSELY GUARDED SECRET`she keeps from the average-looking guys she dates.
Cheating is commonplace because women typically settle in the looks department for relationships and marriage. They cannot truly _LOVE_ a man who does not spark her SEXUAL desire IMMEDIATELY - on LOOKS ALONE! The guy usually cheats because she isn't putting out, and the woman usually cheats because she was never truly sexually attracted to her man in the first place. A man generally does not require a "7" to get sexually aroused, but a women DOES. She has to deal with the internal conflict between the desire for companionship and family, versus her sexual needs. I belive guys would be even worse than women as cheaters if they were in the typical female position. As much as women cheat, the amount of restraint they exhibit before finally succumbing to the temptation is admirable. Too many men do not know how truly easy it is for a woman to cheat if she really wants to. They do it simply because they can, where doing the same takes a lot more effort to accomplish for a man. That's why most female cheating is typically more spontanteous, while a man's cheating is typically more planned and methodical.
Honestly, while a return to traditional ways might be largely beneficial for men, it has its problems. There's gotta be a better way to solve these problems, without women having to settle for a guy they aren't physically attracted to, and taking away the freedoms of another human being. More guys would have mates in a more traditional sexual market, but a pragmatic approach to marriage absolutely CANNOT be sustainable without one gender submitting to the other's total CONTROL, and SERIOUS restraints on divorce. The true nature of female sexuality is THE MAIN FUNDAMENTAL RESAON why women were classically put under such tight constraints. THAT is why feminism and female sexuality is often so tightly interlinked. Notice how much they talk about SEX and SEXUALITY in their writings? That is NOT a coincidence!
I say **** all this slavery and settling ****. This is the 21st century. Mass male looksmaxxing, legalization of anabolic steroids under a physician's care, and publicly available, IMPROVED cosmetic surgery for the aesthetically disabled males, would be the more civilized, progressive, and EASIER-to-accomplish solution. You can call this idea crazy, but as gender problems get progressively worse in the future - and they WILL -, a dramatic solution WILL eventually be necessary. Putting men on gear and under the knife would be far more efficient, peaceful, moral and beneficial, than regulating women to second-class status and glorified prostitution. That's the **** that caused feminism in the first place. In a world of erotic equality, men wouldn't need MGTOW and MRA's, and women wouldn't feel the need for feminism.
The majority of men have been married and have had girlfriends, but many of THOSE men are blissfully unaware of how fake their mate's "love" is . Women find the majority of men unattractive, yet settle for those same guys for practical, social and cultural reasons. Paradoxically, the majority of THOSE guys have NEVER experienced what REAL love from a woman is like! Her practical needs simply outweigh her need for love, and she is under social pressure to maintain a fascade of love for her man. If only those men knew this...
Think about it. What do you think would happen to the dating/marriage game if most men realized just HOW much looks affected their true market value? What do you think would happen if those "normalfags" woke up to the fact that women can ONLY have romantic emotions toward a man who is conventionally physically attractive? If men want to regain the value in society they have lost, they MUST wake up to the redpill truth about male looks and the games women play.
Women would not be able to get away with the blatant disrespect that is so commonplace nowadays. Male knowledge of the true nature of female sexuality would make a woman's erotic capital less effective in gaining special favors and perks from men. Her erotic costs for those special favors would be much higher. They would also have to bring their standards in line with their actual market value and not be so demanding in their mate search. Men as a group would NO LONGER TOLERATE the pricey behavior women get away with so easily today. We would probably see a return to a much more traditional approach to courtship and marriage. The sexual market would be far more balanced between the sexes, like it used to be. Women very well might return to traditional ways... WILLINGLY...as they are faced with the EVEN WORSE end result of unrestricted and uncontrolled female sexuality, without a male counterbalance in place in the sexual market.
The 60s sexual revolution had a major flaw. It allowed women to get ****ed by guys WAY out of their league, but the sexual revolution did not account for the intense internal conflict many women feel between marriage and sexual attraction. Today, the Sisterhood is in the position of trying to explain away damning proof of the true nature of female sexuality. Actions speak louder than words. What men see does not match the words, and not every man is so gullible. Female sexual privaledge is only possible when men remain decieved and unaware of how female sexuality operates.
THAT is why women lie about looks! They KNOW what would happen to their privaledged position in the sexual market. Don't kid yourselves, guys. THEY KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY'RE DOING! If a women is sexually attracted to you, she reveals a part of herself that is a CLOSELY GUARDED SECRET`she keeps from the average-looking guys she dates.
Cheating is commonplace because women typically settle in the looks department for relationships and marriage. They cannot truly _LOVE_ a man who does not spark her SEXUAL desire IMMEDIATELY - on LOOKS ALONE! The guy usually cheats because she isn't putting out, and the woman usually cheats because she was never truly sexually attracted to her man in the first place. A man generally does not require a "7" to get sexually aroused, but a women DOES. She has to deal with the internal conflict between the desire for companionship and family, versus her sexual needs. I belive guys would be even worse than women as cheaters if they were in the typical female position. As much as women cheat, the amount of restraint they exhibit before finally succumbing to the temptation is admirable. Too many men do not know how truly easy it is for a woman to cheat if she really wants to. They do it simply because they can, where doing the same takes a lot more effort to accomplish for a man. That's why most female cheating is typically more spontanteous, while a man's cheating is typically more planned and methodical.
Honestly, while a return to traditional ways might be largely beneficial for men, it has its problems. There's gotta be a better way to solve these problems, without women having to settle for a guy they aren't physically attracted to, and taking away the freedoms of another human being. More guys would have mates in a more traditional sexual market, but a pragmatic approach to marriage absolutely CANNOT be sustainable without one gender submitting to the other's total CONTROL, and SERIOUS restraints on divorce. The true nature of female sexuality is THE MAIN FUNDAMENTAL RESAON why women were classically put under such tight constraints. THAT is why feminism and female sexuality is often so tightly interlinked. Notice how much they talk about SEX and SEXUALITY in their writings? That is NOT a coincidence!
I say **** all this slavery and settling ****. This is the 21st century. Mass male looksmaxxing, legalization of anabolic steroids under a physician's care, and publicly available, IMPROVED cosmetic surgery for the aesthetically disabled males, would be the more civilized, progressive, and EASIER-to-accomplish solution. You can call this idea crazy, but as gender problems get progressively worse in the future - and they WILL -, a dramatic solution WILL eventually be necessary. Putting men on gear and under the knife would be far more efficient, peaceful, moral and beneficial, than regulating women to second-class status and glorified prostitution. That's the **** that caused feminism in the first place. In a world of erotic equality, men wouldn't need MGTOW and MRA's, and women wouldn't feel the need for feminism.
