Why Men Aren't Marrying Video

Augustus_McCrae

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Messages
912
Reaction score
1,010
How did they decide that she should get 1000 dollars a month for 5 years. And how is it even possible to file a motion again to change it 4.5 years after right when it’s aboit to expire. Does a judge not see through this as greed?
In FL alimony is based on 4 things:

1. Length of marriage
2. Standard of living during the marriage (if you’re a good provider & husband it actually works against you)
3. Need
4. Ability to pay

In truth, it could have been much worse. In a case like mine I could have been judged to pay lifetime alimony.

With regard to the lawsuit to modify, the law allows a durational judgement to be modified if there are “substantial” or “exceptional” changes (to my recolllection that’s what the language was the last time I researched it).

So the law has these built in loopholes that an evil ex can screw you with. I don’t believe she has a case, but I still have to lawyer up to defend myself. Plus, god knows what could happen if I get a mangina or feminazi Judge.

-Augustus-
 

taiyuu_otoko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
5,350
Reaction score
3,986
Location
象外
Men are behind the curve from a mathematical / viral perspective.

Consider the idea that the female benefiting from divorce was originally created as a safety net, way back in the day.

As more and more women got divorced, and got paid, more and more women started to "wake up" to at least concept, in the back of their mind, that marriage came with a built in escape clause.

Men, not talking about these things with each other as much as women, were behind the curve.

More and more women still acted like marriage was the only thing in their mind, while keeping the "escape hatch" idea in "emergency case only."

This continued for a few decades, and on the "ho-vine" all women knew about it, but few men did.

But now that the idea of "marriage = risky proposition" has entered into the very slow "dude-vine" women will have a harder and harder time finding a guy who doesn't have the "marriage = risk" meme in his head.

Unfortunately, women still have the "oops I got pregnant and you have to pay for it card" that they can easily play.

So even though the idea that marriage is not a good idea is spreading, men will still have to pay.

Since they'll either have to pay directly, for child support, or via taxes, for child support.

Therefore the idea that men are starting to get turned off to marriage is really not nearly as beneficial as most suspect. Perhaps even worse.

The REAL "awakening" will happen when men REFUSE to even have sex with women unless they KNOW they won't be on any financial hook.

Sadly, this will NEVER happen.

Therefore, men will always pay for women and their kids, one way or another.

The ONLY THING that will change this is a change that affects society at a very DEEP and fundamental level. Taxation, monetary system, etc.

That is very unlikely in any of our lifetimes.
 
Top