Guy69JackBlue
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2021
- Messages
- 1,182
- Reaction score
- 574
- Age
- 44
There's girls in the Marines.Some say Marines are a gang. I say they are a brotherhood
There's girls in the Marines.Some say Marines are a gang. I say they are a brotherhood
Yes I know when I was in the Corps they were referred to Women Marines. Told in bootcamp not even to mess with them.There's girls in the Marines.
Ok well the original point of the thread was why the military guy in the picture had a fat girlfriend. And my original points were to state that not every single person who has ever been in the military is necessarily some brave hero.Hahaha. Like Ive never heard that before. The average marine has a higher IQ than the average civilian. If you don’t score high enough, you don’t get in. You didn’t know that? Could it be left over leftist propaganda?
You want your smartest people in combat arms. Armor, infantry, artillery, combat engineers,
communications.
Of course you get to select your MOS. Draftees do not get a choice. But, we don’t have draftees in the services. They are all volunteers.
cool not worth the risk for me though.Slept with one right after I graduated from advanced infantry training at Pendleton. I shipped out a week later and didn’t return for three years.
He got busted down. I was too but got out as e-2 private first class.If you earn your good conduct medal before being busted down you still rate the good conduct medal thoughUnderstood. Did you not see my post on the picture? It’s fake. He’s a Lance Corporal with a single hash on his sleeve and has a good conduct medal. Since when is an E-3 with more than four years in and a good conduct medal not be at least a corporal or sergeant?
Who the fuk can afford a wife with E-3 pay?
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.
Well I don't know the technical jargon. I just know his face doesn't look like he could protect much of anybody (although a gun certainly helps).Understood. Did you not see my post on the picture? It’s fake. He’s a Lance Corporal with a single hash on his sleeve and has a good conduct medal. Since when is an E-3 with more than four years in and a good conduct medal not be at least a corporal or sergeant?
Who the fuk can afford a wife with E-3 pay?
Did you have to Climb up The Reaper with a 40# backpack?Slept with one right after I graduated from advanced infantry training at Pendleton. I shipped out a week later and didn’t return for three years.
This has got to be the most ridiculous analogy I have ever heard.I was never in the military but for combat soldiers... I think it's about living a code of honor while fulfilling tribalistic desire. It's a code of honor that is given to the enemy combatants as well. They're all playing the game of death. Kinda like gangbangers.
Using one picture to draw a conclusion about an entire group of people is never a very smart idea. But is there any reason to suspect soldiers would be better with women than the average guy? Why would they be?I was looking at this, and it got me interested:
Michigan couple’s MAGA wedding honors President Trump
The couple was married on the Fourth of July.www.mlive.com
View attachment 6461
(NOTE: The fact that the bride is wearing a MAGA dress is peripheral to this post.)
Over the years, I've seen a lot of soldier's wives, and very rarely are they attractive in any way, although perhaps it could be said that they have cute faces (they are ALWAYS fat). Maybe it's something about the warrior ethos of "enjoy the suck" simply being applied to dating? Could it be that they are trained to "complete the mission", which in the case of dating means "marry whatever whale that is in the Theatre of Battle"?
Makes sense, that's about what I was thinking.Best question in the whole thread. The answer is definitely no. The so called “alpha” is a ridiculous term. Extremely misleading to all men. It should be dropped from the lexicon of the “red pill”.
In the world of men, a good operator or a trained and skilled infantryman is extremely dangerous. To other men who are opposing. To give an example, a single marine platoon could easily eliminate an entire city of gang bangers. It would take longer to stack and process the bodies. No contest. Child’s play.
When we talk about the things we do. A complete puzzy noodle could have scores of women. He is desirable from the survival programming of women WITHIN the environment she is trying to survive. If you changed her environment, she would easily morph and mold to that new environment.
So hypothetically let’s take an extreme example to clarify the concept even further:
Let’s say the country was suddenly at war within our borders (or your borders if you are in a different country than the U. S. )
Your high powered business men are now, in the sphere or survival, absolute nothings. They are no longer powerful or don’t even register. They might as well be women as well.
The soldier, marine, or even a resistance gorilla, are now top dogs. Hands down. Women would almost over night mold to this new paradigm. The businessman in a suit is suddenly a little whimpering kid. He has zero skills to survive. He can’t even
A woman’s breeding program will guide her to the fighters to breed. Even if he gets killed, he still fulfilled the biological imperative of procreating. She was only following her biological imperative.
The percentage of men, good with women, in the military is about the same as in the civilian world.
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.
The businessman could easily buy some weapons, though, right?Best question in the whole thread. The answer is definitely no. The so called “alpha” is a ridiculous term. Extremely misleading to all men. It should be dropped from the lexicon of the “red pill”.
In the world of men, a good operator or a trained and skilled infantryman is extremely dangerous. To other men who are opposing. To give an example, a single marine platoon could easily eliminate an entire city of gang bangers. It would take longer to stack and process the bodies. No contest. Child’s play.
When we talk about the things we do. A complete puzzy noodle could have scores of women. He is desirable from the survival programming of women WITHIN the environment she is trying to survive. If you changed her environment, she would easily morph and mold to that new environment.
So hypothetically let’s take an extreme example to clarify the concept even further:
Let’s say the country was suddenly at war within our borders (or your borders if you are in a different country than the U. S. )
Your high powered business men are now, in the sphere or survival, absolute nothings. They are no longer powerful or don’t even register. They might as well be women as well.
The soldier, marine, or even a resistance gorilla, are now top dogs. Hands down. Women would almost over night mold to this new paradigm. The businessman in a suit is suddenly a little whimpering kid. He has zero skills to survive. He can’t even
A woman’s breeding program will guide her to the fighters to breed. Even if he gets killed, he still fulfilled the biological imperative of procreating. She was only following her biological imperative.
The percentage of men, good with women, in the military is about the same as in the civilian world.
He's saying that the business man doesn't live in the same reality as the soldiers under the proposed circumstances. It doesn't matter if he has weapons. The business man is still feeble due to not being on that wavelength, which would be the new desire for females in that paradigm.Or are you saying that because he doesn't have extra special training, that he'd be incompetent in using them?
I think people adapt to their circumstance pretty quickly. Most of the WW2 soldiers were drafted with no prior experience.He's saying that the business man doesn't live in the same reality as the soldiers under the proposed circumstances. It doesn't matter if he has weapons. The business man is still feeble due to not being on that wavelength, which would be the new desire for females in that paradigm.
But why are we attacking the businessman, anyway?You better believe it. He’s a dead man.
A skilled and trained infantryman understands tactics. He understands offensive combat. The purpose of a Five Paragraph Order. He knows how to cover and how to move. He works as a team with the other members. When he’s not shooting at you someone else is. He’s closing the distance. It’s a drilled maneuver and skilled.
The weapon is NOT what’s deadly. You are sadly mistaken. It’s his skill and knowledge that’s deadly.
Under duress and expert shooter will be at a good shooter level. A good shooter will be at an average level. An average shooter will shoot at the poor level. An untrained civilian is gang banger level at best.
Unless you are off a ways and are shooting a hunting rifle, you have zero chance of survival unless you run away. As you probably don’t know concealment and that training, an opposing sniper will most likely take your head off.
I think "invaders" would be in the form of ICBM's if it ever happened.I wouldn’t. There’s no need unless he showed hostile intent. I’m just saying that in the scenario I described he isn’t part of the human equation. He doesn’t count until he gets some training or had some training before becoming a businessman.
In that scenario businessmen are normally subdued or executed by opposing forces anyway. If they can’t lead…they aren’t really part of the breeding equation.
In other words, everything we talk about concerning bettering oneself absolutely will not apply in that scenario. Bettering oneself will become, how well you survive fighting the invaders.
We are living in a fake world. It’s not real.
In a place of tall Chads like Finland, this guy, "White Death", should have gotten mogged incessantly - but he had them all mogged, at least militarily:The businessman could easily buy some weapons, though, right?
Or are you saying that because he doesn't have extra special training, that he'd be incompetent in using them?
A lot of military guys are skinny twigs holding weapons. It's the weapon that's deadly.
But yes, he still got mogged in life:Häyhä is believed to have killed over 500 men during the Winter War, the highest number of sniper kills in any major war.
Häyhä never married and had no children.
Does this make one out of 90million unvaccinated %140 less likely to be married in U.S. or e.e.u.uWhy do most American soldiers have fat wives? For the same reason that most American men have fat wives. 70% of Americans are overweight. Were you expecting soldiers to corner the market on non-obese women?
in contrast to officers and special forces who are amongst the absolute elite of female interest at any level.In the UK, regular soldiers aren't held in particularly high regard by the 'middle class'. They tend to be based in smaller, provincial towns and attend certain types of pubs/bars, which locals know are frequented by 'squaddies'.
In general, certain types of women seem to be attracted to the soldiers and drawn to these places, and not high quality ones at that.