Something I've been wondering lately. Say a guy happens to think a girl he is attracted to looks sexy in a certain pair of heels, or flats, or has pretty feet, or maybe a girl having pretty feet or he prefer girls that wear heels or flats is important to him about the types of women he dates. To me a girl having well kept feet would lead me to believe that she was clean and took care of herself, that would be important to me. I mean if I have to kept myself groomed well then dammit you should to for christ's sake. Yet if a guy admits these are things he prefers in a woman or happens to find attractive, the woman automatically assumes he has a "fetish for feet or shoes". I also like very feminine women. I hate women that wear boots, I think that's borderline manish and women should stick to heels and dressy flats and shoes that are distinguishable from MENS clothing. you don't see any guys buying bra's and panties do you? you see us buying those long sweaters and wearing tights? ofcourse not, that's what WOMEN wear.
my point is this, why do women assume a guy has a fetish when he mentions he likes certain things, yet a woman can admit to being attracted to men with blue eyes, nice smiles, big arms, etc. Why could those not be labeled as "fetishes"? seems like a double standard to me.
my point is this, why do women assume a guy has a fetish when he mentions he likes certain things, yet a woman can admit to being attracted to men with blue eyes, nice smiles, big arms, etc. Why could those not be labeled as "fetishes"? seems like a double standard to me.