Who Decided That Models Are Attractive?

Maximus Rex

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
2,270
Reaction score
445
Location
Villa Regis
Models are the standard of beauty for a homosexual male. Think about it. If a fag absolutely had to bang a chick, he wouldn't choose some sexy, curvy chick with big titties and fat ass. He'd choose what he finds attractive. Which is some tall ass ***** with a pretty face, that has body of resembling that of prepubscent boy. Since homos dominate the fashion and movie industry, their views on beauty are reflected in the women they choose to wear their clothes on the runway, and the women you see in movies.

Really though, how many models and actress would you actually bang. For me it was would Trya Banks, Elizabeth Hurely, Christy Brinkely, (in her younger days,) Kmora Lee Simmons. that Brazilian chick that was on the cover of SI a few yrs ago, and maybe Naomi Campbell. I'm sure there are a few others. Even Tyson Beckford has said that he doesn't **** with models because they're too skinny.

If you don't believe me considering this obversation, look at these two things. Look at the male models. These are guys that homos would want to bang. Male models are usually tall, in shape, and have that "pretty boy mterosexual," look to them. Then there's music videos and booty movies.

The type of chicks that are in videos, porn, and on the cover of Maxim, FHM, King, Playboy, Stuff are they type of women that John Q. Public find attractive. Strangely enough, they're not "model material." Why isn't Tocarra, Vida Gurrera, and women like these gracing the runways of Paris and New York. Why aren't they on the cover of Vogue and Comospolitan? I say it's because they look "too much like women," and they don't fall into the homo's view of beauty.

The strange this is for movies anyway, it wasn't always this way. Marilyn Monroe, Jane Mansfield, Elizabeth Taylor, Dorothy Dandrige, Ruby Dee, and Ingrid Begman were every bit as gorgeous as the press made them out to be and they didn't look like young boys either. They looked and were built like women.

This is something I've always wondered and held true. What do you guys think?
 

wayword

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
1,478
Reaction score
21
Location
BFE
Maximus Rex said:
The type of chicks that are in videos, porn, and on the cover of Maxim, FHM, King, Playboy, Stuff are they type of women that John Q. Public find attractive. Strangely enough, they're not "model material." Why isn't Tocarra, Vida Gurrera, and women like these gracing the runways of Paris and New York. Why aren't they on the cover of Vogue and Comospolitan? I say it's because they look "too much like women," and they don't fall into the homo's view of beauty.
P0rn chicks are built to showcase their bodies, not their clothes (which they aren't even wearing).

Runway models are built to showcase their clothes, not their own bodies. Which tall, skinny girls tend to do much better than Playboy bunny bodies.
 

TheNewGuy

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 26, 2005
Messages
529
Reaction score
0
How about this:

Any heterosexual male would have sex with any model or porn star given the opportunity.

Can someone tell me otherwise?
 

pooparu

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Messages
412
Reaction score
10
Location
In a land called **** it.
Deus ex Pianoforte said:
Tocarra is too fat to be attractive, therefore she's not on Cosmo and Vogue. Although there is a market for her on the black magazines apparently. Vida Guerrera is most likely too big too. These are high fashion magazines, dude. They want THIN. THIN is attractive, not fat. That's just biology, like it or not, blame it on all the "homos" or not.
Vida? Fat? That can't go in a sentence together, unless you speak of her ass. And its guerra not guerrera.

High fashion magazines my ass, they want coke/dope feind thin. Thin and Fit are 2 totally different hings, thats not biology at all, whoever said that needs to be punched. Fit women > skinny crack *****s. Majority of men would prefer vida to most skinny models with no body and chalked up face, any day.

Vida...fat. How dare you.
 

Maximus Rex

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
2,270
Reaction score
445
Location
Villa Regis
Deus ex Pianoforte said:
I think you're a seriously misguided bigot, and it's scary that there's actually people like you actually out there wandering around...driving, and voting.
I think you're a seriously misguided bigot, and it's scary that there's actually people like you actually out there wandering around...driving, and voting.
You made the charge, now back it up. Explain to me how this is "bigotted and misguided?

"Homos" do not dominate the fashion industry, women do.
How most much of the male designers are men? Gay men at that. Verasce, Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hiliger, Gucci etc. The only female designer I can think of off hand is Donna Karen. Where are all of these females? ehind the scenes? And another question if most of the people in the fashion industry are woman, how come when there's a segment on fashion on a TV, often times the commentor is a "flame on Johnny Storm," homosexual? Saying that homosexuals don't the fashion industry is saying that Domicians don't dominate Major League Baseball.

Tocarra is too fat to be attractive, therefore she's not on Cosmo and Vogue. Although there is a market for her on the black magazines apparently. Vida Guerrera is most likely too big too.

Sometimes people say things that are so incredibly asinine or idiotic that I have to disengage myself from the conversation. This is one of those times.
 

Phoenix_of_the_ashes

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
725
Reaction score
6
Location
Europe
They want THIN. THIN is attractive, not fat. That's just biology, like it or not, blame it on all the "homos" or not.
Bull****.

Explain to me how thin is biologically attractive?

Biology dictates that functionality leads to attraction. Big tits underline a womasn capability to nurture offspring, round hips imply easy childbirth. A caveman would probably beat most thin models to death in rejection.
 

Wee

Don Juan
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Messages
147
Reaction score
2
I think the "the runway model type bodies are the ones gay guys find attractive" statement is a alright theory, but who knows. I've seen some american's next top model and those girls aren't really that hot. All that they have going for them is that they are more photogenic than most girls, and after the makeup is put on and pics are taken they look NOTHING like they do in real life. Their bodies I guess work as blank slates. Really since they model women's clothes, their bodies MUST appeal to women, and it is true. How many insecure girls do you hear saying "I wish I was thinner" or I wanna look like that (while pointing at a toothpick). Girls like skinny. If they were into the kind of girls that men liked then obviously they wouldn't be dominating an industry where looks matter. Come on guys, if no one found these girls attractive then they wouldn't have a career.

I personally prefer girls with at least something to grab on to.
 

Bible_Belt

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
17,104
Reaction score
5,735
Age
48
Location
midwestern cow field 40
It's gross getting poked by a skinny girl's ribs. It really does feel like a 'bag of bones.' I think fat chicks are definitely more comfortable, at least until they get so big that my elbows don't reach the bed.
 

SELF-MASTERY

Banned
Joined
Dec 15, 2004
Messages
1,975
Reaction score
7
I think that runway models look like starved deer that some mean hunter gave blow to. I like the Victoria Secret models because they are thicker, have breast and womanly hips (hour glass.)

Thin is good as long as they are healthy thing and have perky parts...

The OP was right about homosexual men running the fashion industry-- take a look at all of the major design houses that are owned and operated by gay men.

Straight (real) men like T&A **** don't!
 

IsiMan84

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
546
Reaction score
3
Location
DFW
Deus ex Pianoforte said:
A couple off the top of my head:

1) Said heterosexual male is married/attached, and is strong enough to resist temptation.

2) Above-mentioned heterosexual male doesn't find every model or porn star attractive (which is true for the vast majority of men).
1) Any normal man who knows what's good for him wouldn't be able to resist.

2) I assume he is referring to A-list porn stars and models, to which I would say yes and yes. B-list and below are usually the deviant porn (pregnant, fat, etc.). Otherwise I guess those very few guys are somehow spending over $10 billion a year on the porn industry if that's the case.
 

Taviii

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Messages
734
Reaction score
7
Location
Florida
I like models and I think they tend to have the perfect body.

Anyway what the **** does it matters? Every guy has his taste. Some like fat (like they mentioned here), I and many others like models.
 

KillaCam

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 26, 2005
Messages
770
Reaction score
3
Maximus Rex said:
How most much of the male designers are men? Gay men at that. Verasce, Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hiliger, Gucci etc. The only female designer I can think of off hand is Donna Karen.
Well done dude. You can recognise mainstream brands. Here, have a gold star :p

God forbid, there can be no designers other than the multi-million dollar labels you just mentioned. That's just impossible.
 

seanchai

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
767
Reaction score
5
Age
39
Location
Seattle
KillaCam said:
Well done dude. You can recognise mainstream brands. Here, have a gold star :p

God forbid, there can be no designers other than the multi-million dollar labels you just mentioned. That's just impossible.
He has a point. Lots of design houses were started by gay men (YSL, Balenciaga, Giorgio Armani, Christians Dior and Lacroix), though specifically the skinny look is championed by many straight designers today. And lots of women have been influential in fashion in the past 30 or so years: Vivienne Westwood, Coco Chanel, Miuccia Prada, Donatella Versace, Jil Sander, and Ann Demeulemeester today.
 

Phoenix_of_the_ashes

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
725
Reaction score
6
Location
Europe
Heh. Really? Um, ok. Take a look at a fat chick sitting down at Dunkin Donuts. Take a look at a thin chick doing crunches on her Swiss Ball. Who would you rather f'uck? Yeah. Need more? Ok. Thin indicates healthy, which is what men instinctively look for in a mate in order to produce healthy offspring. More? Ask 100 dudes that pass by you on the street one day if they'd rather f'uck a fat chick or a thin chick. Write down the results, ask your question again, and if you're still having problems...come back to the thread.
So all of the sudden we only have extremes?

Believe it or not, were not all from America were "round" is just a euthamism for "fat fücking fück".
 

Cowhead418

Don Juan
Joined
Jun 25, 2006
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Deus ex Pianoforte said:
You never said "round". All I said was fat, and thin...and you start going into a defense for "round" chicks. It's funny how you didn't start defending the "thin" chicks. I mean, it's fine if you have a fat fetish, bro. But don't start telling me that the majority of men would rather f'uck a fat, round, plump, chubby, heavyset or whatever the hell you want to call an overweight woman over a healthy, fit woman.
You aren't getting the point here. He's not saying he'd rather bang a fat chick. What he is saying is that he'd rather have a healthy, fit woman than a thin, anorexic one. And most models these days more accurately fit the latter description.
 

Phoenix_of_the_ashes

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Messages
725
Reaction score
6
Location
Europe
Deus ex Pianoforte said:
You never said "round". All I said was fat, and thin...and you start going into a defense for "round" chicks. It's funny how you didn't start defending the "thin" chicks. I mean, it's fine if you have a fat fetish, bro. But don't start telling me that the majority of men would rather f'uck a fat, round, plump, chubby, heavyset or whatever the hell you want to call an overweight woman over a healthy, fit woman.
How the fück do you get the idea I have a fat fetish just because I dont like the model type? I like women with curves, big boobs, big ass, nice thick legs. Thats natural, thats biological.

Crack ***** looking women with bodys like 4 year old boys are not my type. Those are just silly ideals that obviously come from people who arent healthy heterosexual men.
 

What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.

You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

Top