backbreaker said:
you screwed them all over. you stood them up when they were younger. you didn't return their phone calls because you were getting ran up in by some dude you met who ditched you. you got mad becuase they actually were trying to study and not go out every night and you left. you set men with unreasonable demands, like expecting 100-200 dollar valentines day presents for someone you bearly know. When he called you to tell you happy brithday, you didn't bother to return his call, or text, or email. you didn't know what you had when you had it more times than not. you shot him down when he approached you because you were trying to be cute in front of your friends. You thought it was cool to flirt with his "hot" friend in front of him. Then afte ryou have screwed up, you turn around and try to use shaming to get a man to "act right" or "do the right thing " or "act his age" now that your options aren't what they were and now that the same man, is now more appealing to you.
sorry I just had to get that off my chest. most women today make me want to throw up with their behaviors. I dont' see how you guys do it.
Dude...it's not just women. It's PEOPLE in general. They're just following "the program" instead of doing what they believe in.
Women are taught that "this is how you play the game to extract maximum value for your time". The program teaches people how to take the most while giving the least. It's something that replicates itself through layers of society, through our economy, etc.
Both men and women need to learn to GENERATE VALUE in relationships and how to IDENTIFY PEOPLE THAT APPRECIATE that value and will respond in-kind. No more of this trying to impress someone to get what YOU want. You GIVE what you can and you TAKE what you want. That's what a "good man" does. That's enough for most people.
Women especially lose track of this because most of them aren't dominant enough to make a moral stand on anything. They're dragged around by their emotions because that's what they're taught to do.
Like I said in another thread, I pity those women who had REAL potential in life, either to develop into "players" in society by learning real skills and contributing ideas and abilities, or even who had the potential to be strong and wisened effeminate mothers...but were taught by a generation of retarded parents to "levereage their looks" instead.
This so-called "revolution" is a lie, something sold to women in the most heinous of ways. They were taught to use p*ssy as "leverage" in relationships, to wield POWER over others by virtue of being coveted for their sexuality. But all it did was make them "takers". Women have been taught in the 21st century that just having a va-jay-jay is ENOUGH...that that ALONE makes them valuable...while at the same time men are taught to covet the va-jay-jay above ALL ELSE.
That's why the modern "marriage" focuses so little on value-building and a constructive/growing relationship and so much on sexual exclusivity...that "ownership" idea.
Women haven't been empowered by the so-called "sexual revolution". They've been OBJECTIFIED. Even more than they used to be.
It makes me laugh...there's this Heiniken commercial...you've probably seen it. Where the guy is at a wedding and everyone is trying to pick up the one hot girl, but this guy asks grandma to dance to impress her...
They released two versions of this commercial. THe original says, "there are two types of hunters...one who goes after the prey, and the other who makes the prey come to him". The second version is the same, but they replaced the word PREY with the word PRIZE.
I guess some women didn't like the idea of being "prey" because it implies a state of powerlessness...but at least "prey" can be strong in its own right. Instead they choose the word "prize"...which based on current social thinking, somehow "empowers" the woman by virtue of her being a hot girl with a p*ssy, the "ultimate social goal". But does that REALLY empower her? No...it OBJECTIFIES her. A prey is a worthy adversary in the dating "hunt". A "prize" is just something to be won, putting all the focus on the guy to do the work and NONE of the power in the hands of the woman...if he "makes the right moves", he gets her, whether she likes it or not.
And she's TRAINED from her birth what the "right moves" are and to give it up to guys who make those moves, and reject those who do something different.
Garbage. You wonder why we live in a world that lacks creative solutions, that encourages men to run by a program rather than try and risk failure being something other than "perfect".
One must indeed be ignorant of the methods of genius to suppose that it allows itself to be cramped by forms. Forms are for mediocrity, and it is fortunate that mediocrity can act only according to routine. Ability takes its flight unhindered. -Napoleon Bonaparte
Women sit and wonder where all the "good men" have gone because the "good men" don't have TIME for these games. Many just up-out of the "dating world" ENTIRELY and pursue those things that interest them, that they are passionate about. Women who are WORTH a damn recognize the value in these men and are drawn to THEM, rather than the man having to pursue.
That's what the commerical AIMS for, but it gets it wrong, in that it's OBVIOUS that the man taking the old lady to dance is just a "trick" like a monkey jumping through a hoop, trying to curry the favor of the young lady "prize". In that, the second man is no better than the first. I danced with my grandmother (God rest her soul) at my sister's wedding because I felt it was a nice thing to do, not because I wanted to get some chick to notice me.
One man innovates, a thousand more imitate and wonder why only the innovator gets noticed for it. That's why your DJ tactics are "no good here"...because the girls have seen them a hundred times before and see it not as a spontaneous act representing who YOU are, but as a cheap stunt to curry favor.
The problem is that when a man DOES perform a gracious act out of the kindness of his heart, or come up with some grand idea or novel concept, the woman ASSUMES that it's just a "trick she hasn't seen yet" and writes him off as "just another shmuck".
Sooner or later, EVERY guy is a "shmuck"...and then the women are left wondering "where all the good guys have gone".
Chivalry IS dead....and women killed it. -Dave Chappelle
The whole system is screwed up...and it's screwed up because people don't think for themselves.
