When did SoSuave become an authoritarian state?

[Jaylan]

Jaylan, on one hand you say SS is an authoritarian state. Then you say that the mods aren't doing their job.

You created a fake account that we removed. Creating a secondary, fake account is a bannable offense.

If you were a mod, what would you do at this point?

Here's what's going on in my mind... You are in constant battles with several people here. Why is that? Most members here are not. Some are very opinionated, and yet they are not attracting strife.

IMO much of what your detractors are saying is inappropriate, but I still question why you, the common denominator, are attracting all these battles.

Again I ask, aside from some silly accusation from a frustrated mod who couldnt handle the fact that a few people disagreed with him, where the evidence that I created a second account? Lets be serious here...the dude got so frustrated that he tried to say that 4 accounts were 1 user. Come on now, thats trying too hard and going off the deep end.

And if you think Im the only one that guys like tits-man and his ilk frequently bicker with, do I need to direct you to the posts of Zarky, SocialLeper, or backbreaker? I frequently see the hostile dudes on this forum insult those guys and toss around grade school names at them when they happen to disagree with them. Open your eyes a little bit Atom. The difference between me and those other guys is I wont relent when I think Ive made a valid point. And of course that pisses off the hostile bros. Theyd wish Id back down when they pull the high school tactics.

At the end of the day, in a forum where many of the guys are frustrated with the world around them and have no where to vent but here, it makes sense to me that some of them will attack those who feel differently than they do. So in regards to the common denominator, thats the one I see. The common denominator is the immature attitude from some who are emotionally tied to their beliefs that they dont know how to have a disagreement with someone without lashing out like a hormonal teenager.

Lets be real.

I've never seen a more entitled troll in my LIFE. Know your place.

Know my place? lmfao. Its an internet forum kid. Im not worried about places when it comes to a public online message board.

Jaylan this forum isn't for kids. Sticks and stones break your bones but words can't hurt you. If words hurt you that bad and you can't take the occasional insult then you need some toughening up. "Immature" is a vaginal word. Non-castrated men are inappropriate by nature. Get used to it.

Don't expect everyone else to work around YOUR beta sensitivities. Reminds me of the typical busy body woman who starts controversy and tries to get TV shows, Movies, Music and Video games censored because she is offended by them.

No one is forcing you to be here. If you don't like SoSuave there's the door bro. :kick:

Immature is a vaginal word? Lmao. Some of you guys are hilarious. You call anything you disagree with vaginal, phaggot, mangina, etc. The fact of the matter is that insult laden responses that are frequent here, are generally without a logical retort. Many guys stoop to immature insults because they have no decent rebuttal to the position they are arguing against.

Id direct people to Danger's posts as a good example of how you argue with someone sans weak character attacks. I dont agree with many things the dude says, but he gets his point across most of the time without insults, and with a great use of rationale and logic.

In my view, a castrated man is a man who cannot back up his point of view, and thus becomes emotional and hurls insults in defeat. I see that a lot here. Many folks are incapable of substantive counterarguments when their point of view is challenged, so all they can do is resort to trying to emasculate someone with insults.

And the reality is, many dudes here arent these so called non-castrated males you speak of. They are just your typical internet guy. People on the internet are generally more abrasive than they ever would be in real life. In real life they would simply look like a childish fool if they resorted to name calling when someone challenged their opinions. And in a worst case scenario, such behavior would lead to a fight in the real world.

This is why I never have anyone get brazen with me during these sort of debates in the real world. The internet gives people bravado.

It seems not every SoSuave member truly understands the Power to Walk Away. Game ain't just for gettin' in panties.

And thats ties into something I constantly say on this forum. A PUA forum should be primarily about getting into panties, yet most of the disagreements I, or other memeber here, get into are down to stupid political and societal arguments. As I said and a couple others have said in other threads here, all of that stuff doesnt really have much to do with getting puzzy. Its just a lot of the complaining from the manosphere.

OP please stop whining like a b!tch and go back to your KAYLAN alias on loveshack. This is a site for men, not whiny b!tches.

Lmao, you people keep bringing up my LS account. Who gives a fvck about my posting over there. I give dudes who really need it some advice on how to avoid bad relationships and bad women. And I tell them how to find the good ones. You know, minus all the whiny political and social arguments.

Last I checked, the whiny b!tches seem to be the guys who get all emotional and lash out at anyone who disagrees with their opinion on this site. Oh wells. Par for the course. I dont give a damn that I have haters here. I just laugh at the fact that I see hypocrisy in the enforcement of forum rules. Lord knows Ive seen people banned for some of the behavior I explained in my OP.

For me its not about Jaylan's opinions or general whiny attitude. I have rarely but heads with him in any threads. Sometimes he actually makes decent points.

For me.. its about changing the site into something its not. This isn't a G-rated, Micky Mouse, Utopia website. Its "red pill". Its about the harsh realities of the real world and human nature.

Thats the thing. Red pill isnt one vantage point. Nor is the red pill reality correct in all it shows. Some of red pill has great merit, while some of it is a lot of convoluted, mental masturbatory bullcrap.. The problem is some dudes dont like the fact that some peoples perceptions are different from their own.

What drew me to this site was its abundant straight talk and lack of sugar-coating. This is why SoSuave is one of the few great places for REAL men and those who aspire to be real men.

Fagging up this site starts with a few beta's complaining. Then you get overly sensitive beta moderators. Next thing you know--> SoSuave becomes LoveShack.

Its a slippery slope.

And this is the funny part. How do you not see that many of the guys on this site do nothing BUT complain about the world, and whine and b!tch about society. Yet these same dudes do nothing to really change anything. Youve even called out these same dudes that I get into these scraps with, so lets be real homie.

If SS was all about straight talk among non-castrated men, then why do some guys get so emotionally tied to their beliefs that they cannot disagree with someone without incessant complaining and belligerence?

 

[Married Buried]

Again I ask, aside from some silly accusation from a frustrated mod who couldnt handle the fact that a few people disagreed with him, where the evidence that I created a second account? Lets be serious here...the dude got so frustrated that he tried to say that 4 accounts were 1 user. Come on now, thats trying too hard and going off the deep end.

And if you think Im the only one that guys like tits-man and his ilk frequently bicker with, do I need to direct you to the posts of Zarky, SocialLeper, or backbreaker? I frequently see the whiny dudes on this forum insult those guys and toss around grade school names at them when they happen to disagree with them.

Open your eyes a little bit.

At the end of the day, in a forum where many of the guys are frustrated with the world around them and have no where to vent but here, it makes sense to me that some of them will attack those who feel differently than they do. So in regards to the common denominator, thats the one I see. The common denominator is the immature attitude from some who are emotionally tied to their beliefs that they dont know how to have a disagreement with someone without lashing out like a hormonal teenager.

Lets be real.
Know my place? lmfao. Its an internet forum kid. Im not worried about places when it comes to a public online message board.

Immature is a vaginal word? Lmao. Some of you guys are hilarious. You call anything you disagree with vaginal, phaggot, mangina, etc. The fact of the matter is that insult laden responses that are frequent here, are generally without a logical retort. Many guys stoop to immature insults because they have no decent rebuttal to the position they are arguing against.

Id direct people to Danger's posts as a good example of how you argue with someone sans weak character attacks. I dont agree with many things the dude says, but he gets his point across most of the time without insults, and with a great use of rationale and logic.

In my view, a castrated man is a man who cannot back up his point of view, and thus becomes emotional and hurls insults in defeat. I see that a lot here. Many folks are incapable of substantive counterarguments when their point of view is challenged, so all they can do is resort to trying to emasculate someone with insults.

And the reality is, many dudes here arent these so called non-castrated males you speak of. They are just your typical internet guy. People on the internet are generally more abrasive than they ever would be in real life. In real life they would simply look like a childish fool if they resorted to name calling when someone challenged their opinions. And in a worst case scenario, such behavior would lead to a fight in the real world.

This is why I never have anyone get brazen with me during these sort of debates in the real world. The internet gives people bravado.
And thats ties into something I constantly say on this forum. A PUA forum should be primarily about getting into panties, yet most of the disagreements I, or other memeber here, get into are down to stupid political and societal arguments. As I said and a couple others have said in other threads here, all of that stuff doesnt really have much to do with getting puzzy. Its just a lot of the complaining from the manosphere.
Lmao, you people keep bringing up my LS account. Who gives a fvck about my posting over there. I give dudes who really need it some advice on how to avoid bad relationships and bad women. And I tell them how to find the good ones. You know, minus all the whiny political and social arguments.

Last I checked, the whiny b!tches seem to be the guys who get all emotional and lash out at anyone who disagrees with their opinion on this site. Oh wells. Par for the course. I dont give a damn that I have haters here. I just laugh at the fact that I see hypocrisy in the enforcement of forum rules. Lord knows Ive seen people banned for some of the behavior I explained in my OP.Thats the thing. Red pill isnt one vantage point. Nor is the red pill reality correct in all it shows. Some of red pill has great merit, while some of it is a lot of convoluted, mental masturbatory bullcrap.. The problem is some dudes dont like the fact that some peoples perceptions are different from their own.
And this is the funny part. How do you not see that many of the guys on this site do nothing BUT complain about the world, and whine and b!tch about society. Yet these same dudes do nothing to really change anything. Youve even called out these same dudes that I get into these scraps with, so lets be real homie.

If SS was all about straight talk among non-castrated men, then why do some guys get so emotionally tied to their beliefs that they cannot disagree with someone without incessant complaining and belligerence?

Then post about getting LAID you stupid b!tch. That's why this site exists, not to hear about your problems.

 

[Jaylan]

This is called individualism, my job, my career, my opinion, me me me me!

Individualism destroys societies.

Prior to perestroika there was collectivism, people thought not only for themselves, but for others. How America win cold war? Through ideological war, which through propaganda advertised individualism, and people began to think about themselves only, and not give a damn about others.

Soviet Union was a state in which Russia thought and cared for other states, and you know who first left Soviet Union? Russia. It would have never been possible under collectivism, it required individualism.

Individualism stinks, it makes people not respect other people, in life, in business, on the road, in person. Individualism leads to issues, like the one you described.

What can you do?

You can realize that the people around you are mostly immature and you have grown past them. At this point you have to make a choice of how to live your life.

The type of ideology we choose mostly depends on what is popular. Blue pill cool aid mainstream mostly individualism, red pill collectivism. Don't let the sheep mentality opinion of the main stream religious fanatics stop you from disseminating the red pill truth. Me me me me, all about me, f'ck you all, is wrong. Keep banging on it till it becomes very unpopular.

You call the mainstream as blue pill coolaid the sheeps drink, yet you seem to be advocating red stateism in the form of collective socialism where everyone believes similar things in the form of the red pill.

With the way you explain this, it sounds like another form of koolaid. I thought the red pill was all about thinking for yourself and seeing the world for what it is to begin with. Since when has it been about a collectivist mode of thinking and just buying into a frame of thought that isnt of your own reality?

I thought the red pill was supposed to be that freedom, that mental individuality that wakes people up to how the world truly is. Collectivism is merely another form of bondage and another flavor of Koolaid in my book.

No thanks, but good post nonetheless. It sparked some good thinking.

Then post about getting LAID you stupid b!tch. That's why this site exists, not to hear about your problems.

On the contrary, many dudes do come here and whine about their personal problems with the world. Thats not my purpose here. I dont complain about the world the way many here do. I just argue against lame viewpoints when I encounter them. And then I offer advice and my own viewpoints in dating threads that pique my interest.

 

[Married Buried]

You call the mainstream as blue pill coolaid the sheeps drink, yet you seem to be advocating red stateism in the form of collective socialism where everyone believes similar things in the form of the red pill.

With the way you explain this, it sounds like another form of koolaid. I thought the red pill was all about thinking for yourself and seeing the world for what it is to begin with. Since when has it been about a collectivist mode of thinking and just buying into a frame of thought that isnt of your own reality?

I thought the red pill was supposed to be that freedom, that mental individuality that wakes people up to how the world truly is. Collectivism is merely another form of bondage and another flavor of Koolaid in my book.

No thanks, but good post nonetheless. It sparked some good thinking.
On the contrary, many dudes do come here and whine about their personal problems with the world. Thats not my purpose here. I dont complain about the world the way many here do. I just argue against lame viewpoints when I encounter them. And then I offer advice and my own viewpoints in dating threads that pique my interest.

Where do FEMALES fit into this? Where is your game, are you banging chics?

 

[Bokanovsky]

Jaylan, on one hand you say SS is an authoritarian state. Then you say that the mods aren't doing their job.

You created a fake account that we removed. Creating a secondary, fake account is a bannable offense.

This double standard is quite typical of those who lean to the left politically. On the one hand, they claim to be the champions of freedom and victims of oppression. On the other hand, they demand that anyone who does not agree with them get censored (for being "racist", "sexist", "homophobic", etc.) Gaylan did not just register a fake account (TerrorTed) but did so with the purpose of giving negative reps to people who didn't agree with him. It doesn't get any more petty and pathetic than that.

On a side note, People love to complain about the mods, but IMO, the mods on this forum generally do a pretty good job. They ban the obvious trolls but otherwise have a mostly hands off approach. As Playher Man said, this is a forum for men, which means that there's bound to be a certain amount of straight talk that some may find offensive. Political correctness and excessive sensitivity are not masculine traits. I think that I speak for the vast majority of SS members when I say that we do not want SS to become a second Loveshack.

 

[Jaylan]

^Yet you dont see the hypocrisy in calling women out for being emotional yet so many guys here are too emotionally tied to their beliefs. People can say what they wish, and I really do not care....freedom of speech can reign supreme.

My issue is that dudes here whine and complain about those who disagree with them, despite you asserting that lefties want to censor those who disagree with them. In reality some guys here want just that. They want people who disagree with their viewpoints to be banned or not allowed on the site in general. And Ive seen it too many times before that the dudes who are hostile to differing viewpoints, will immediately start telling people to get off this site, or whining about how someone should be banned if they insult someone back who insulted them first.

My issue is the hypocrisy, not the speech so much. Why throw rocks and then whine if someone throws rocks back? And when mods start trying to bait members into flame wars that may get someone banned, how can anyone not see the lameness in that. Which seemed to be occurring in a recently close thread between a mod and another member.

Where do FEMALES fit into this? Where is your game, are you banging chics?

Thats a dumb question. Any conversation regarding the red pill directly ties into how a man views the world and the women in it. Youre married arent you? Yet I rarely if ever see you giving any good advice to guys regarding game. Nor do I see you provide anything good regarding wife game.

I do see other older guys providing good info on wife game. So maybe you should be focusing on providing some good info yourself. And to answer youre last question, Im having a pretty fun summer so far. And Im going to hit the sands again this weekend. Would you like a lay report this time?

 

[Married Buried]

^Yet you dont see the hypocrisy in calling women out for being emotional yet so many guys here are too emotionally tied to their beliefs. People can say what they wish, and I really do not care....freedom of speech can reign supreme.

My issue is that dudes here whine and complain about those who disagree with them, despite you asserting that lefties want to censor those who disagree with them. In reality some guys here want just that. They want people who disagree with their viewpoints to be banned or not allowed on the site in general. And Ive seen it too many times before that the dudes who are hostile to differing viewpoints, will immediately start telling people to get off this site, or whining about how someone should be banned if they insult someone back who insulted them first.

My issue is the hypocrisy, not the speech so much. Why throw rocks and then whine if someone throws rocks back? And when mods start trying to bait members into flame wars that may get someone banned, how can anyone not see the lameness in that.

Thats a dumb question. Any conversation regarding the red pill directly ties into how a man views the world and the women in it. Youre married arent you? Yet I rarely if ever see you giving any good advice to guys regarding game. Nor do I see you provide anything good regarding wife game.

I do see other older guys providing good info on wife game. So maybe you should be focusing on providing some good info yourself. And to answer youre last question, Im having a pretty fun summer so far. And Im going to hit the sands again this weekend. Would you like a lay report this time?

Yeah man, if you don't have a lay report I am going to kick your ass.

 

[PlayHer Man]

^Yet you dont see the hypocrisy in calling women out for being emotional yet so many guys here are too emotionally tied to their beliefs. People can say what they wish, and I really do not care....freedom of speech can reign supreme.

My issue is that dudes here whine and complain about those who disagree with them, despite you asserting that lefties want to censor those who disagree with them. In reality some guys here want just that. They want people who disagree with their viewpoints to be banned or not allowed on the site in general. And Ive seen it too many times before that the dudes who are hostile to differing viewpoints, will immediately start telling people to get off this site, or whining about how someone should be banned if they insult someone back who insulted them first.

My issue is the hypocrisy, not the speech so much. Why throw rocks and then whine if someone throws rocks back? And when mods start trying to bait members into flame wars that may get someone banned, how can anyone not see the lameness in that. Which seemed to be occurring in a recently close thread between a mod and another member.

Why don't you call Judge Judy then?

Jaylan this is one place on the Internet. One place of many you CHOOSE to visit. If you don't like the food at a restaurant.. why do you keep going back? Then you complain to the owner while continuing to go back over and over.

I guess you're like a wh0re in an abusive relationship. You b!tch about the abuse but you refuse to leave. :crackup:

At this point you're getting exactly what you deserve. No sympathy.

 

[Hustlaz Ambition]

The difference between me and Jaylan: He takes this forum seriously, I don't I just rile up these faggots on here because its funny, not because I want to change their views.

 

[Jaylan]

Why don't you call Judge Judy then?

Jaylan this is one place on the Internet. One place of many you CHOOSE to visit. If you don't like the food at a restaurant.. why do you keep going back? Then you complain to the owner while continuing to go back over and over.

I guess you're like a wh0re in an abusive relationship. You b!tch about the abuse but you refuse to leave. :crackup:

At this point you're getting exactly what you deserve. No sympathy.

Lmao, I dont take this place that seriously. And I dont give a damn if dudes want to throw shade. I just have to point out the hypocritical behavior I see exhibited hear quite often. If anything, places like this keep me thoroughly entertained. What can I say, Im a sucker for decent banter.

The difference between me and Jaylan: He takes this forum seriously, I don't I just rile up these faggots on here because its funny, not because I want to change their views.

I dont take these dudes seriously. I actually find a lot of their b!tching funny, especially because they are so quiet about their complaints in the real world.

 

[Hustlaz Ambition]

And on the topic of this thread. I obviously can’t talk for Jaylan (or maybe I can since apparently we’re the same person) but, and correct me if I’m wrong, the main grievance of the OP is based around the fact that:


1) Mod starts thread

2) People in thread disagree with him and mod gets angry. I have been PM'd by several people whom have provided reassurance that I am not the unreasonable one in said thread.

3) Mod’s starts throwing insults (attacking the character rather than the argument itself as other posters have noted)

4) Mod continues on his assault making baseless accusations (e.g claims I post womanly advice)

5) Knowing this is completely untrue I simply ask him to direct me to a post where this is the case

6) Mod, realising he can't do this, reverts to his previous tactics - more baseless accusations

7) I give up, realising its clear some people can’t be reasoned with. It also helps that his own posts are making him look bad.

8) Mod replies. No answer from me.

9) Mod posts again in an attempt to have the last word then locks thread.

10) Mod then reopens thread only to post further lies to discredit myself and then locks the thread again, presumably so we can’t expose how low mod has stooped in an attempt to save face.

11) Mod then in a desperate attempt to "win" tries to get me banned on completely fabricated grounds, more than likely made up by himself, conjuring images of Stalin's show trials.


Anyone with some time to spare should take a look and decide for themselves.

http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=206778

If anything it has decent entertainment value.

Wow that thread was pathetic. Kinda reminds me of all the bitter spics who make 100+ threads on boxing forums on every Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquaio article.(Mexican fighters always choke away and lose the big fights).

 

[Dalshtröm]

I will be in the side of OP and his fellow travelers. Right now I just red the whole thread enjoying it so totally I don't feel like writing anything anymore. This thread sucked all my energy out.

But here I go, some energy just came back, I gues it's the nature of the mind to swing back and fort otherwise there would be no evolution. Lets see, first of all, many of you must remember Olivia right? Let me open her and make it even more clear that she certainly did not do anything wrong, still the facts that she spoke against people's ideas got some deep hatred going; she was able to rise uncontrolable feelings in the members.

Now she made it very clearly in her posts, that she wanted a list of forum rules and at that moment there was none. Until she was banned, did the moderator put the forum rules on. Just to put the blame on her. Now if that is not hypcrosity, then what is? The moderator propably banned this. He propably did not give the rules just so she would go on breaking the rules until she would eventually got banned - and that is exactly what happened.

Olivia asked very friendly, multiple times for the rules but the moderator simply told the members to ignore what she says. Now what is wrong with this moderator. He literally said that she has not broken any rules and is welcomed here, but ignore her. Don't give her attention and don't answer back to her. Is that not an unwelcoming trait? First he said that she is welcome here, and then he said to treat her like unwelcomed here. That is absolutely a hypocrisy.

She asked many times and in a very friendly way, she asked whetever the things she says is is illegal here or not. And the answer the moderator gave them was, "Ignore this kid who needs help." Now if she needed help, then certainly you should help her rather than ignoring her, and in fact, this forum is based on helping. It's very basic, the ground is based on helping people who needs help.

Eventually she got banned without a warning, without ever receiving the forum rules she asked for. And the biggest hypocrisy she showed this forum is, was when she got banned with a message saying that she insulted the people in this forum. I am amazed at this behavior of the moderator. She was insulted heavily by the members heraelf; ahe was constantly called an attention vhore, alut, cvunt, sick person. And the very fact that the moderator told the members to ignore her is the biggest insult; her very reason to come here in this forum, was to get people's help, and what she got was total ignore. Now what was the purpose of this forum again? It is certainly to help people who got issues.

And if we look at the banning reason again, it was insulting..
Can you see what kind of hypocrisy they practice here? Now even in this few past days, there has been heavily insulted people. We recently saw the crash between a member and a moderator. I don't think that I need to say more about it. You know perfectly well how the member was treated.

And not to mention, the rate must be at least one in two - the rate of insults per thread. Thee is literally insults in every other thread started. Even in this post, the OP was called by many unnecessary things that could have easily hurtled him, insulted. Some people will get hurt more easily by words and some may not. There was someone in this thread saying that this forum is mens and that words should not affect men. He is wrong. Most of the men coming in this forum is woman inside. That is this forums whole job - to make her into a man. So basically this forum is, and must be at least 90 percent of man who have not been unplugged and is still very fragile against words - and only a woman is fragile against words, they say! And if words should not hurt men... Then certainly the moderator is a woman, because he was very much insulted. insulted to a point where he had to find rationalazitions and literally plan how to ban the insulter - without seeming wrong! And the insulter was needing help and was a young lady herself for god sake!

So if insult was the reason to ban someone, then certainly you should clear and empty this forum of insulters.. Because there is very many of them and rules are rules! So ban the insulters or unban the young lady, ask her for forgiveness and tell her that tou was sinply being hypocate. A man who dows not know how to accept his own mistakes is not certainly a man. And change the rules to accepting insults. Otherwise you will get the head title of hypocrisy - and that you don't want! You are fighting very much against having the title of hypocrite yourself, here and now. And if you lose it.. God knows will you commit suicide. So don't be a hypocrite even to yourself. That will be the limit. That will be the line of being an authentic human being and a false one; If you are hypocrite even to yourself, you are best off to commit suicide.

 

[backseatjuan]

You call the mainstream as blue pill coolaid the sheeps drink, yet you seem to be advocating red stateism in the form of collective socialism where everyone believes similar things in the form of the red pill.

With the way you explain this, it sounds like another form of koolaid. I thought the red pill was all about thinking for yourself and seeing the world for what it is to begin with. Since when has it been about a collectivist mode of thinking and just buying into a frame of thought that isnt of your own reality?

I thought the red pill was supposed to be that freedom, that mental individuality that wakes people up to how the world truly is. Collectivism is merely another form of bondage and another flavor of Koolaid in my book.

No thanks, but good post nonetheless. It sparked some good thinking.
On the contrary, many dudes do come here and whine about their personal problems with the world. Thats not my purpose here. I dont complain about the world the way many here do. I just argue against lame viewpoints when I encounter them. And then I offer advice and my own viewpoints in dating threads that pique my interest.

We -- Wolves,

And

We are too few in comparison

With you Dogs

 

[Hustlaz Ambition]

The problem with making truthful statements, is that white men are not allowed to make them.....or else they are misogynist or part of the kkk.

Or number 3 get their ass kicked unless they're Italian of course, but they were not even considered white for a long period of time. So, then again maybe not.

 

[PlayHer Man]

Lmao, I dont take this place that seriously. And I dont give a damn if dudes want to throw shade. I just have to point out the hypocritical behavior I see exhibited hear quite often. If anything, places like this keep me thoroughly entertained. What can I say, Im a sucker for decent banter.
I dont take these dudes seriously. I actually find a lot of their b!tching funny, especially because they are so quiet about their complaints in the real world.

People don't whine constantly about stuff they don't take seriously. Who you think you're fooling?

You're like a wh0re who gets dumped and tells everyone: "I don't even care, I was going to dump him anyway and he had a small penis!!" Yeeaaahhh.. riiight.... :crackup: :crackup:

Nice try with the weak attempt at damage control but we ALL know you're butthurt over your "Persecution" on SoSuave.

 

[Purefilth]

People don't whine constantly about stuff they don't take seriously. Who you think you're fooling?

You're like a wh0re who gets dumped and tells everyone: "I don't even care, I was going to dump him anyway and he had a small penis!!" Yeeaaahhh.. riiight.... :crackup: :crackup:

Nice try with the weak attempt at damage control but we ALL know you're butthurt over your "prosecution" on SoSuave.

i think he feels "Persecuted".

He's probably surprised that this joke of a thread has run on this long too. I expect he would have been happier if it closed down on his first couple of posts. Now he's run out of points to make.....


Shame we aren't censoring him here - that would help his "point":rock:

 

[PlayHer Man]

I will be in the side of OP and his fellow travelers. Right now I just red the whole thread enjoying it so totally I don't feel like writing anything anymore. This thread sucked all my energy out.

But here I go, some energy just came back, I gues it's the nature of the mind to swing back and fort otherwise there would be no evolution. Lets see, first of all, many of you must remember Olivia right? Let me open her and make it even more clear that she certainly did not do anything wrong, still the facts that she spoke against people's ideas got some deep hatred going; she was able to rise uncontrolable feelings in the members.

Now she made it very clearly in her posts, that she wanted a list of forum rules and at that moment there was none. Until she was banned, did the moderator put the forum rules on. Just to put the blame on her. Now if that is not hypcrosity, then what is? The moderator propably banned this. He propably did not give the rules just so she would go on breaking the rules until she would eventually got banned - and that is exactly what happened.

Olivia asked very friendly, multiple times for the rules but the moderator simply told the members to ignore what she says. Now what is wrong with this moderator. He literally said that she has not broken any rules and is welcomed here, but ignore her. Don't give her attention and don't answer back to her. Is that not an unwelcoming trait? First he said that she is welcome here, and then he said to treat her like unwelcomed here. That is absolutely a hypocrisy.

She asked many times and in a very friendly way, she asked whetever the things she says is is illegal here or not. And the answer the moderator gave them was, "Ignore this kid who needs help." Now if she needed help, then certainly you should help her rather than ignoring her, and in fact, this forum is based on helping. It's very basic, the ground is based on helping people who needs help.

Eventually she got banned without a warning, without ever receiving the forum rules she asked for. And the biggest hypocrisy she showed this forum is, was when she got banned with a message saying that she insulted the people in this forum. I am amazed at this behavior of the moderator. She was insulted heavily by the members heraelf; ahe was constantly called an attention vhore, alut, cvunt, sick person. And the very fact that the moderator told the members to ignore her is the biggest insult; her very reason to come here in this forum, was to get people's help, and what she got was total ignore. Now what was the purpose of this forum again? It is certainly to help people who got issues.

And if we look at the banning reason again, it was insulting..
Can you see what kind of hypocrisy they practice here? Now even in this few past days, there has been heavily insulted people. We recently saw the crash between a member and a moderator. I don't think that I need to say more about it. You know perfectly well how the member was treated.

And not to mention, the rate must be at least one in two - the rate of insults per thread. Thee is literally insults in every other thread started. Even in this post, the OP was called by many unnecessary things that could have easily hurtled him, insulted. Some people will get hurt more easily by words and some may not. There was someone in this thread saying that this forum is mens and that words should not affect men. He is wrong. Most of the men coming in this forum is woman inside. That is this forums whole job - to make her into a man. So basically this forum is, and must be at least 90 percent of man who have not been unplugged and is still very fragile against words - and only a woman is fragile against words, they say! And if words should not hurt men... Then certainly the moderator is a woman, because he was very much insulted. insulted to a point where he had to find rationalazitions and literally plan how to ban the insulter - without seeming wrong! And the insulter was needing help and was a young lady herself for god sake!

So if insult was the reason to ban someone, then certainly you should clear and empty this forum of insulters.. Because there is very many of them and rules are rules! So ban the insulters or unban the young lady, ask her for forgiveness and tell her that tou was sinply being hypocate. A man who dows not know how to accept his own mistakes is not certainly a man. And change the rules to accepting insults. Otherwise you will get the head title of hypocrisy - and that you don't want! You are fighting very much against having the title of hypocrite yourself, here and now. And if you lose it.. God knows will you commit suicide. So don't be a hypocrite even to yourself. That will be the limit. That will be the line of being an authentic human being and a false one; If you are hypocrite even to yourself, you are best off to commit suicide.

I think the occasional hypocrisy from moderators on SoSuave boils down to something very simple--> This is a site for Straight MEN first and foremost. A place on the web for straight masculine men to call their own.

So if you are: Female, Gay, Blue pill beta.... Your opinions and feelings will matter a lot LESS to the Moderators than the opinions and feelings of masculine straight men.. A.K.A the people this site is actually FOR.

These women, gays, betas, etc.. choose to come here (knowing what this site is about) and rile people up. Its like going to a gay site and talking about how gays are wrong or going to hell.. OR going to a Christian site and promoting Muslim or Atheist values. Its trolling. Those people have no interest in hearing that sh!t. They can hear it everywhere else. They want their own little corner of the web with like-minded people.

So I don't blame the moderators for banning some of these people.

SoSuave is a boys club. The boys come first.. everyone else comes second. Majority rules.

 

[speed dawg]

Or number 3 get their ass kicked unless they're Italian of course, but they were not even considered white for a long period of time. So, then again maybe not.

Ask Anderson Silva.

 

[Jaylan]

i think he feels "Persecuted".

He's probably surprised that this joke of a thread has run on this long too. I expect he would have been happier if it closed down on his first couple of posts. Now he's run out of points to make.....

Shame we aren't censoring him here - that would help his "point":rock:

Im not surprised at the threads length. Some of you are rather predictable is all. xD

People don't whine constantly about stuff they don't take seriously. Who you think you're fooling?

You're like a wh0re who gets dumped and tells everyone: "I don't even care, I was going to dump him anyway and he had a small penis!!" Yeeaaahhh.. riiight.... :crackup: :crackup:

Nice try with the weak attempt at damage control but we ALL know you're butthurt over your "Persecution" on SoSuave.

Lmao Youre really one to talk about whining. Do I need to pull up your post history to refresh your memory? There is no damage control here buddy. You guys think I take this place that seriously? lolz get over yourself bro.

PS - awesome bolding bro. Maybe you should start adding underlines, large font, and italics to your post.

The problem with making truthful statements, is that white men are not allowed to make them.....or else they are misogynist or part of the kkk.

Theres nothing wrong with having balls sometimes and just saying what you believe. Its not like I dont have to deal with people who want to yell racist, misogynist, race-baitor at some of the things I say.

I actually lost a good chick friend because she couldnt handle the fact that I felt some girls were skanks who were nothing more than good enough for a lay to me. She felt I was a misogynist and stopped talking to me. And thats only one small example of backlash Ive dealt with.

Fvks given however? Zero

One should also note that she was banned very shortly after making this post:

In guess who's thread?

http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=197705&page=9

Apparently criticism of any material produced by our dear moderator (in this instance, mostly copied from "Double Your Dating" and various other ebooks) is now a bannable offense as well.

Duly noted sir.

But do realize that women arent really welcomed here in general, and Ive seen them banned for far less than any man would ever be banned for. So whenever I see a female posting here, I expect the ban hammer soon, even if she didnt seem to do much. Ive only see women allowed to stay here long if they seem to be yes-women. And even then, they end up being banned after getting into a flame war with someone.

 

[Hustlaz Ambition]

I can only assume you are talking about race and calling whites "wimps" when compared to someone like you, a black man.


I once told a black man to his face that he was a lowlife thug whiny b1tch. He was an @ss at a bowling alley who cried like a little b1tch when I beat him at a video game, over and over again. Despite his few gold teeth mind you. He called me names and couldn't stand it that I was beating him. Called me a "cheesy @ss little white b1tch".

You know what he did to me when I threw it back at him? Nothing. Sure he yelled louder, he motioned faster, he raised quite the ruckus and even told me he was going to slam my face into the video screen.

I asked him what he was waiting for.

And then he walked out.


So, if your point is to tell whites that they are pu$$ies, then I have to say that you are no tougher.


If, however, you are unable to argue effectively and in your frustration your only recourse is to call whites "pu$$ies". Then now I can see what your problem is.



And of course, I'm not surprised that Hustlaz, our resident race-baiter makes it all about race again.

Gold teeth? All the niggas on your side of the city date fat *****es with tats(since you claim that's all you see) Boy oh boy you must live in the neck of the woods

Hey Danger, dawg I'm only reporting what I see. If white males actually won fights I wouldn't have said it. Down here in the south, especially in my highschool the whiteboys lost every fight against the Mexicans, they already knew better than to try blacks. I still remember when my Mexican Amigas cracked this redneck head over the sink in the bathroom. Danger it's just what I see If I ever saw whites beat up esses and blacks I wouldn't have said that, but I haven't seen it.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t640608/

If an all time great, top 5 dead or alive, #1 P4P Worldclass Boxing Athlete, two years back to back highest paid athlete in the world says white men can't compete with Hispanics and blacks when it comes to fighting, then......lol. I can't make this stuff up homie.