What's your rating scale

[Dhoulmagus]

I've noticed more people are willing to throw out 9s like candy or 3s on average girls. My scale is more balanced. Ugly and fat girls are all below 4. Average girls range in 5-7. Hot girls range in 7.1 to 8.5. Anything about an 8.5 has to have additional value other than me glimpsing at her unless she is that hot lol. This value can be the outfit and hair style she is wearing, is she famous, what is she doing right now, and so on. There are no 10s in my book unless I married a 9 lol.

 

[Tictac]

Yes, I will do her.

No. I will not do her.

Everything else (1-10 - whatever) is just how high the pedestal you put them on is.

 

[AttackFormation]

I have a scale of 1-4

1: Too ugly to f*ck
2: Sex but no relationship - ashamed to be seen with
3: Sex but no relationship - not ashamed to be seen with
4: Sex and potential relationship

Girls who are slim are uninteresting to me purely sexually but I can still like them, so they don't fit into it.

 

[Desdinova]

I usually base my ratings on looks alone, except when it comes to anything above an 8. A 9 in my book would be an attractive woman with a fantastic personality. I still have yet to meet one.

 

[Starwolf]

I have a scale of 1-4

1: Too ugly to f*ck
2: Sex but no relationship - ashamed to be seen with
3: Sex but no relationship - not ashamed to be seen with
4: Sex and potential relationship

I Agree, this is a very honest approach.

a lot of 4's will become 2's when you go LTR with them.. lol they become fat

 

[PeasantPlayer]

There is no suck thing as a 10 and I have never seen a 9. Highest I seen was a solid 8. And some of the girls rated 9 on here are usually in my taste 5-7s

 

[logicallefty]

This would be my LOOKS scale:

1 - needs two seats or more on the airplane and/or so ugly she scared the roaches away and put the Orkin Man out of business, :kick:

2 - Hey at least she isn't a 1, but no thanks, bye :wave:

3 - sex with Harry Carey sized beer googles, one time

4 - sex with a little help from Miller or the Blue Moon, probably just once :cheer:

5 - sex as Mother Nature intended, plate

6 - plate or potential Lucky Lady Lefty, average Plane Jane

7 - plate or potential Lucky Lady Lefty, above average Plane Jane

8 - plate or potential Lucky Lady Lefty, hot as he|| + geeky

9 - plate or potential Lucky Lady Lefty, just hot as he|| to any man who is straight, not legally blind, and of good sound mind :rockon:

10 - plate or potential Lucky Lady Lefty, so hot jealous friends will cry , and I will laugh at them :crackup:

That being said, if a woman is a super duper b|tch from the get-go I don't care how good she looks I won't be attracted to her.

My favorite pick of a woman is a plane jane geek brunettes, average or slim body, and I love the glasses/librarian look too.

Bottom line, this scale will probably never be a perfect match for all of us, we all have our tastes.

 

[El Payaso]

I'm more attracted to body before face.

 

[EveryPostHere]

Big tits=stupid bi*ch
Big butt=stupid cvnt
Big teeth=suk my deek

 

[PeasantPlayer]

I'm more attracted to body before face.

yup

 

[Yewki]

Personality really does play a big part. And not just their actual personality, but perceived personality as well.

When we look at someone who we don't know, we tend to automatically associate them with a type of personality based on past experiences with other people. That personality we connect them with affects how we see them, even if we know nothing about who they actually are.

If a girl looks hot at a glance, but you get to know her and it turns out she has a repulsive personality you would probably be turned off and never look at her the same again. Now anyone else we look at who reminds of us that girl may come across as less attractive... even though others might think she's hot.

Same thing happens with people who remind us of celebrities. If someone looks like a celebrity, and you like that celebrity, you'll probably find that person appealing. At least, at a glance.

 

[BrainDamage92]

Well intelligence and a mind that works in a way similar to mine are the best thing but very rare. Or not so much, its all about the mindset. Looks is unimportant, ofc no pysycally repulsive bishes, but life has taught me if you have a normal looking girl with a mind sharp as razor blade a good sense of humour, let alone self-irony and all the goodies that a good brain spawns...

And then you got the brainless but HB100000 bimbo... well I wouldnt even think for a second...

Ive been with a girl who every guy wants to fvuck and even merry (lol) for far longer than I shouldve. Perfect proportions, perfect hight, perfect face, perfect legs, perfect ass. Not entirely "classic" proportions, but perfect. Almost all was like that "Shes perfect" "She is so in love with you" only old playas told me to stay the **** away which I ignored...

Let me tell you, looks is unimportant, what is looks, if at every second sentance of hers you think "God shes so dumb" "God shes so immature"...

Looks is nothing... If us men were about more than looks and had bigger demands regarding female personality instead of worshipping physical beauty like retards the quality of women would improve. **** in the old days even prostitutes had good education and culture and were a smart conversationalist. Nowadays we got "good" girls who just graduated from university completely illiterate, without having worked a single day of their lives, only knowing how to suck **** and not very good at that too... They didnt even give them a degree for it...

So forget looks.

 

[bigneil]

It took me a long time to learn that rating only applies to the rater. With a rating, people are saying how hot THEY think the girl is, but it almost always leads to disappointment when we see her because we expected it to be a girl WE rate that hot. You have to scale to that persons own beauty level. If they overachieve, it is an accomplishment.

A man who is a 2 scoring with a 3 is the same as a man who is a 6 scoring with a 9. Both men got a girl 50% hotter than they were!

A problem with a beauty is that you will get bored of her, and other men will be awestruck, so naturally the other men will make her feel more special (the way you once made her feel), so she will eventually leave you for them. And you won't care! You should see how mad they get then!

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

 

[Meisterman]

It should be self explanatory...right?

1 = Bottom 10%
5 = Average 50%
9 = Hotter than 90% of girls
10 = Perfect. Hotter than 99.99% of girls

NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE!!!!!

If 10 random girls lined up one of them would be lucky to get an 8. This is because a huge majority of girls fall in the 4-7 range.

Think of it like an IQ bell curve. Only a very small percentage are at the far left end (mental retardation) and an equally few small number of people on the right end (super geniuses).

So there are likely more "5s" in the world than 8s, 9s, and 10s combined. The higher you go on the scale, the smaller percentage of girls meet the criteria to be rated that.

The mean rating, by definition, is 5 (average). It is also the mode (the number that occurs most often in the sequence of numbers) where a majority of women end up in the 4-6 scale.

So instead of 9s being rated as the top 10%, it's more likely to look something like this: With 5 being used as a control baseline (average), and each pre and post sequential number deviating from the mean (5) at a predictable exponential rate.


10s - Top 0.1%
9s- Top 3%
8s - Top 8%
7s - Top 18%
6s - Top 33%
5s - Top 50%
4s - Top 78%
3s - Top 92%
2s - Top 97%
1s - Top 99.9% (Bottom 0.01%)

^^^This is what a standard deviation bell curve of women's ratings should look something like. Of course, this suggests that for every 1, there is a 10.

Us DJ's can agree that this is NOT true...As in this particular number rating sequence it is easier to fall below the mean than above it (i.e. it takes less effort to make yourself look like sh*t than it does to make yourself flawless). Therefore instead of the 1s encompassing the bottom 0.1%, it's likely closer to 3%. And instead the 2s in the bottom 3%, it's likely the bottom 8%.

So you see it begins to mirror the other side of the bell curve now. The reason why 1 mirrors 9 and not 10 is because 10 is an epitomization of idealistic perfection, and should be compared to 0 on the rating scale instead of 1

In other words, 10 is the bar of perfection. As soon as you say someone is perfect, you literally give no room for improvement whatsoever. This is a very limiting aspect. Hence why only 0.01% (1/10,000) of girls can be considered a 10.

If you think you have seen more than a single digit number of 10s in your life you are not rating properly. I myself have only seen maybe 2 or 3 perfect 10s.

With that said, now accounting for this outlier and updating the curve, and now employing equal standard deviations from the mean on both sides, it should look something like this:

10s - Top 0.01%
9s - Top 3%
8s - Top 8%
7s - Top 18%
6s - Top 33%
5s - Top 50%
4s - Top 67%
3s - Top 82%
2s - Top 92%
1s - Top 97%
0s - Top 99.99% (Bottom 0.01%)

So basically 0 and 10 are control measures to confine any possible variable (woman) within those parameters. Which is why you really shouldn't assign any woman a 10, unless she's quite literally the single closest measure to perfection you have to compare to.

Also keep in mind that on this bell curve, the women won't simply be assigned a definitive, absolute integer. Their rating would likely be a decimal place that falls in the percentile of the corresponding number (For example a 5.8 would be in between the top 50 and top 33 percentile, but likely closer to 33 since 5.8 is closer to 6 than it is to 5.)

Keep in mind most guys will rate a girl they are sleeping with 1 or 2 points higher than she really is, even if they don't mean to do so. They're knowingly or unknowingly biased because the hotter the woman they're sleeping with is, the more perceived value they bestow upon themselves. Which is actually quite common to do.

This explains why you see many posters on here (and in person) claiming they just bagged an HB8-9. When the reality is 8s and 9s make up just over 10% of the female population. So while it's definitely possible that it did in fact happen, it's likely that she's a 7 instead and they just gave her the benefit of the doubt to boost their own value with or without realizing it.

I'm not really sure this is the answer you were looking for, but if you were curious on a more analytical approach to the whole "rating system" structure and how values should be assigned, there you go.

Of course, none of this is relevant anyway to basically anyone who actually uses it, myself included.

I really should have saved you and everyone who read this the time and just wrote this instead:

1-4: Nope.

6-10: Yes.

5: Danger zone. Proceed with caution...

 

[skinnyguy]

The reason so many guys don't get laid is that their standards have gone up while the quality of women has gone down.

 

[JonnyD123]

My friends and I use a "going out" or "stay at home" scale. A little makeup and some nice fashion can do wonders, but can also be deceiving. So we'll say she's a going out 7, stay at home 6.